These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

336 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28094094)

  • 41. Validity and reliability of the italian-Neonatal skin risk assessment scale (i-NSRAS).
    Curcio F; Vaquero Abellán M; Dioni E; de Lima MM; Ez Zinabi O; Romero Saldaña M
    Intensive Crit Care Nurs; 2024 Feb; 80():103561. PubMed ID: 37826961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales; Cubbin and Jackson, Braden, and Douglas scale.
    Jun Seongsook RN; Jeong Ihnsook RN; Lee Younghee RN
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2004 Feb; 41(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 14725784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Pressure ulcer incidence and Braden subscales: Retrospective cohort analysis in general wards of a Portuguese hospital.
    Sardo PMG; Guedes JAD; Alvarelhão JJM; Machado PAP; Melo EMOP
    J Tissue Viability; 2018 May; 27(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 29398293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Predictive validity of Waterlow Scale for pressure ulcer development risk in hospitalized patients.
    Serpa LF; de Gouveia Santos VL; Gomboski G; Rosado SM
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2009; 36(6):640-6. PubMed ID: 19920745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Multicentre, prospective cohort study, to validate the Italian version of the Braden Q scale for the risk of the pressure sores in newborns and up to 8 years old children].
    Chiari P; Poli M; Magli C; Bascelli E; Rocchi R; Bolognini S; Tartari P; Armuzzi R; Rossi G; Peghetti A; Biavati C; Fontana M; Gazineo D; Cordella S; Tiozzo E; Ciliento G; Carta G; Taddia P
    Assist Inferm Ric; 2012; 31(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 22825296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A Retrospective Analysis of Pressure Ulcer Incidence and Modified Braden Scale Score Risk Classifications.
    Chen HL; Cao YJ; Wang J; Huai BS
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2015 Sep; 61(9):26-30. PubMed ID: 26367479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injury: Risk-Adjusted Comparisons in an Integrated Healthcare Delivery System.
    Rondinelli J; Zuniga S; Kipnis P; Kawar LN; Liu V; Escobar GJ
    Nurs Res; 2018; 67(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 29240656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Assessing predictive validity of the modified Braden scale for prediction of pressure ulcer risk of orthopaedic patients in an acute care setting.
    Chan WS; Pang SM; Kwong EW
    J Clin Nurs; 2009 Jun; 18(11):1565-73. PubMed ID: 19490294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The Neonatal Skin Risk Assessment Scale for predicting skin breakdown in neonates.
    Huffines B; Logsdon MC
    Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs; 1997; 20(2):103-14. PubMed ID: 9423386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Predicting pressure ulcer risk: comparing the predictive validity of 4 scales.
    Jalali R; Rezaie M
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2005 Mar; 18(2):92-7. PubMed ID: 15788914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Pressure ulcers in the intensive care unit: the relationship between nursing workload, illness severity and pressure ulcer risk.
    Cremasco MF; Wenzel F; Zanei SS; Whitaker IY
    J Clin Nurs; 2013 Aug; 22(15-16):2183-91. PubMed ID: 23216694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A comparison of the performance of the Braden Q and the Glamorgan paediatric pressure ulcer risk assessment scales in general and intensive care paediatric and neonatal units.
    Willock J; Habiballah L; Long D; Palmer K; Anthony D
    J Tissue Viability; 2016 May; 25(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 27020863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A comparison of Braden Q, Garvin and Glamorgan risk assessment scales in paediatrics.
    Anthony D; Willock J; Baharestani M
    J Tissue Viability; 2010 Aug; 19(3):98-105. PubMed ID: 20421164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A Meta-analysis to Evaluate the Predictive Validity of the Braden Scale for Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment in Long-term Care.
    Chen HL; Shen WQ; Liu P
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2016 Sep; 62(9):20-8. PubMed ID: 27668477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Predicting pressure ulcer risk: a multisite study of the predictive validity of the Braden Scale.
    Bergstrom N; Braden B; Kemp M; Champagne M; Ruby E
    Nurs Res; 1998; 47(5):261-9. PubMed ID: 9766454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Pediatric pressure ulcer prevalence--one hospital's experience.
    Dixon M; Ratliff C
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2005 Jun; 51(6):44-6, 48-50. PubMed ID: 16014992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Skin integrity in the pediatric population: preventing and managing pressure ulcers.
    Quigley SM; Curley MA
    J Soc Pediatr Nurs; 1996; 1(1):7-18. PubMed ID: 8951145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Pressure Injury Risk Assessment in Pediatric Intensive Care: A Prospective Validation Study of the Glamorgan Scale and Predictive Comparison with the Braden Q Scale.
    Vocci MC; Amante Miot H; Mendes Bertoncello Fontes C; Fernandes Abbade LP
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2023 Mar; 36(3):1-7. PubMed ID: 36806282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Construct Validity of the Braden Scale for Pressure Ulcer Assessment in Acute Care: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach.
    Chen HL; Cao YJ; Shen WQ; Zhu B
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2017 Feb; 63(2):38-41. PubMed ID: 28267683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Skin assessment and pressure ulcer care in hospital-based skilled nursing facilities.
    Siem CA; Wipke-Tevis DD; Rantz MJ; Popejoy LL
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2003 Jun; 49(6):42-4, 46, 48 passim, contd. PubMed ID: 12874483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.