These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
333 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28094094)
81. Body mass index and pressure ulcers: improved predictability of pressure ulcers in intensive care patients. Hyun S; Li X; Vermillion B; Newton C; Fall M; Kaewprag P; Moffatt-Bruce S; Lenz ER Am J Crit Care; 2014 Nov; 23(6):494-500; quiz 501. PubMed ID: 25362673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
82. Comparison of the predictive validity of the Braden and Waterlow scales in intensive care unit patients: A multicentre study. Tao H; Zhang H; Ma Y; Lv L; Pei J; Jiao Y; Han L J Clin Nurs; 2024 May; 33(5):1809-1819. PubMed ID: 38031387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
83. Assessing the Validity and Reliability of a New Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Scale for Patients in Intensive Care Units. Efteli E; Güneş Ü Wound Manag Prev; 2020 Feb; 66(2):24-33. PubMed ID: 32294059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
84. Reliability and validity of the Braden Scale for predicting pressure ulcer risk. Kring DL J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2007; 34(4):399-406. PubMed ID: 17667086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
85. Pressure injury and risk in the inpatient paediatric and neonatal populations: A single centre point-prevalence study. Marufu TC; Setchell B; Cutler E; Dring E; Wesley T; Banks A; Chatten M; Dye E; Cox S; Boardman R; Reilly L; Manning JC J Tissue Viability; 2021 May; 30(2):231-236. PubMed ID: 33589375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
86. Technology supporting research and quality improvement: a success story. Colfer A; Brodecki D; Hutchins L; Stellar JJ; Davis KF J Pediatr Nurs; 2011 Dec; 26(6):595-6. PubMed ID: 21925590 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
87. A Retrospective Analysis to Evaluate Seasonal Pressure Injury Incidence Differences Among Hip Fracture Patients in a Tertiary Hospital in East China. Chen HL; Zhu B; Wei R; Zhou ZY Ostomy Wound Manage; 2018 Feb; 64(2):40-44. PubMed ID: 29481326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
88. Predictive Validity of the Braden Scale for Pressure Ulcer Risk in Critical Care: A Meta-Analysis. Wei M; Wu L; Chen Y; Fu Q; Chen W; Yang D Nurs Crit Care; 2020 May; 25(3):165-170. PubMed ID: 31985893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
89. Predictive validity and reliability of the Braden scale for risk assessment of pressure ulcers in an intensive care unit. Lima-Serrano M; González-Méndez MI; Martín-Castaño C; Alonso-Araujo I; Lima-Rodríguez JS Med Intensiva (Engl Ed); 2018 Mar; 42(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 28215408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
90. Can Braden Score Predict Outcomes for Hospitalized Heart Failure Patients? Bandle B; Ward K; Min SJ; Drake C; McIlvennan CK; Kao D; Wald HL J Am Geriatr Soc; 2017 Jun; 65(6):1328-1332. PubMed ID: 28221672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
91. [Evaluation of the Glamorgan Scale in a paediatric intensive care unit: agreement and reliability]. Kottner J; Schröer F; Tannen A Pflege; 2012 Dec; 25(6):459-67. PubMed ID: 23188755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
92. Pressure Ulcers in the Intensive Care Unit: An Analysis of Skin Barrier Risk Factors. He M; Tang A; Ge X; Zheng J Adv Skin Wound Care; 2016 Nov; 29(11):493-498. PubMed ID: 27755048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
93. Supplementing the Braden scale for pressure ulcer risk among medical inpatients: the contribution of self-reported symptoms and standard laboratory tests. Skogestad IJ; Martinsen L; Børsting TE; Granheim TI; Ludvigsen ES; Gay CL; Lerdal A J Clin Nurs; 2017 Jan; 26(1-2):202-214. PubMed ID: 27322501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
94. The COMFORT behavioural scale and the modified FLACC scale in paediatric intensive care. Johansson M; Kokinsky E Nurs Crit Care; 2009; 14(3):122-30. PubMed ID: 19366409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
95. Skin care team in the pediatric intensive care unit: a model for excellence. Pasek TA; Geyser A; Sidoni M; Harris P; Warner JA; Spence A; Trent A; Lazzaro L; Balach J; Bakota A; Weicheck S Crit Care Nurse; 2008 Apr; 28(2):125-35. PubMed ID: 18378732 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
96. Automated Pressure Injury Risk Assessment System Incorporated Into an Electronic Health Record System. Jin Y; Jin T; Lee SM Nurs Res; 2017; 66(6):462-472. PubMed ID: 29095377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
97. Inter- and intrarater reliability of the Waterlow pressure sore risk scale: a systematic review. Kottner J; Dassen T; Tannen A Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Mar; 46(3):369-79. PubMed ID: 18986650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
98. Inter-rater reliability of three most commonly used pressure ulcer risk assessment scales in clinical practice. Wang LH; Chen HL; Yan HY; Gao JH; Wang F; Ming Y; Lu L; Ding JJ Int Wound J; 2015 Oct; 12(5):590-4. PubMed ID: 25224688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
99. Using the Braden subscales to assess risk of pressure injuries in adult patients: A retrospective case-control study. Lim E; Mordiffi Z; Chew HSJ; Lopez V Int Wound J; 2019 Jun; 16(3):665-673. PubMed ID: 30734477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
100. Comparison of the Predictive Validity of Norton and Braden Scales in Determining the Risk of Pressure Injury in Elderly Patients. Kiyat I; Ozbas A Clin Nurse Spec; 2024 May-Jun 01; 38(3):141-146. PubMed ID: 38625804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]