283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28094686)
1. Northwestern University Flexible Subischial Vacuum Socket for persons with transfemoral amputation-Part 1: Description of technique.
Fatone S; Caldwell R
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Jun; 41(3):237-245. PubMed ID: 28094686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Northwestern University Flexible Subischial Vacuum Socket for persons with transfemoral amputation: Part 2 Description and Preliminary evaluation.
Fatone S; Caldwell R
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Jun; 41(3):246-250. PubMed ID: 28132589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantification of rectifications for the Northwestern University Flexible Sub-Ischial Vacuum Socket.
Fatone S; Johnson WB; Tran L; Tucker K; Mowrer C; Caldwell R
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Jun; 41(3):251-257. PubMed ID: 28094689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of NU-FlexSIV Socket Performance for Military Service Members with Transfemoral Amputation.
Brown SE; Russell Esposito E; Ikeda AJ; Wilken JM; Fatone S
US Army Med Dep J; 2018; (2-18):38-47. PubMed ID: 30623397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Ischial Containment and Subischial Sockets on Comfort, Function, Quality of Life, and Satisfaction With Device in Persons With Unilateral Transfemoral Amputation: A Randomized Crossover Trial.
Fatone S; Caldwell R; Angelico J; Stine R; Kim KY; Gard S; Oros M
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2021 Nov; 102(11):2063-2073.e2. PubMed ID: 34214499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Ischial Containment and Subischial Sockets Effect on Gait Biomechanics in People With Transfemoral Amputation: A Randomized Crossover Trial.
Fatone S; Stine R; Caldwell R; Angelico J; Gard SA; Oros M; Major MJ
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2022 Aug; 103(8):1515-1523. PubMed ID: 35296398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Technique modifications for a suction suspension version of the Northwestern University Flexible Sub-Ischial Vacuum socket: The Northwestern University Flexible Sub-Ischial Suction socket.
Caldwell R; Fatone S
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2019 Apr; 43(2):233-239. PubMed ID: 30223715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Hybrid Subischial Socket for Persons With Transfemoral Amputation: Gait Parameters and Clinical Assessment of a Case Series.
Pellegrini R; Denza G; Brunelli S; Zenardi D; Imperio M; Vannozzi G; Traballesi M
Can Prosthet Orthot J; 2021; 4(1):36252. PubMed ID: 37614930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative analysis of interface pressures in transfemoral prosthetic sockets.
Paternò L; Truppa L; Ibrahimi M; Rosini E; Gruppioni E; Ricotti L; Menciassi A
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2024 Apr; 48(2):176-183. PubMed ID: 37379468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Axial bone-socket displacement for persons with a traumatic transtibial amputation: The effect of elevated vacuum suspension at progressive body-weight loads.
Darter BJ; Sinitski K; Wilken JM
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Oct; 40(5):552-7. PubMed ID: 26423107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Prospective Assessment of an Adjustable, Immediate Fit, Subischial Transfemoral Prosthesis.
Dillingham TR; Kenia JL; Shofer FS; Marschalek JS
Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl; 2022 Sep; 4(3):100200. PubMed ID: 36123976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Motion of the residual femur within the socket during gait is associated with patient-reported problems in transfemoral amputees.
Gale T; Yang S; McGough R; Fiedler G; Anderst W
J Biomech; 2020 Nov; 112():110050. PubMed ID: 33035840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of the transfemoral prosthetic socket interface designs on skeletal motion and socket comfort: A randomized clinical trial.
Kahle J; Miro RM; Ho LT; Porter M; Lura DJ; Carey SL; Lunseth P; Highsmith J; Highsmith MJ
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2020 Jun; 44(3):145-154. PubMed ID: 32308126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A novel, low-cost transradial socket fabrication method using mass-producible components and expanding rigid foam.
Miller LA; Pickerill T; Kuiken TA
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2021 Feb; 45(1):89-93. PubMed ID: 33834750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effectiveness of elevated vacuum and suction prosthetic suspension systems in managing daily residual limb fluid volume change in people with transtibial amputation.
Youngblood RT; Brzostowski JT; Hafner BJ; Czerniecki JM; Allyn KJ; Foster RL; Sanders JE
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2020 Jun; 44(3):155-163. PubMed ID: 32186238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Satisfaction and problems experienced with transfemoral suspension systems: a comparison between common suction socket and seal-in liner.
Gholizadeh H; Abu Osman NA; Eshraghi A; Ali S; Yahyavi ES
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2013 Aug; 94(8):1584-9. PubMed ID: 23262380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interface Pressure System to Compare the Functional Performance of Prosthetic Sockets during the Gait in People with Trans-Tibial Amputation.
Ibarra Aguila S; Sánchez GJ; Sauvain EE; Alemon B; Fuentes-Aguilar RQ; Huegel JC
Sensors (Basel); 2020 Dec; 20(24):. PubMed ID: 33317006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the new, patient-adjustable socket system Varos in the early phase of prosthetic rehabilitation: a pilot study.
Nia A; Toetschinger G; Kubinec T; Domayer S
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2022 Jun; 58(3):462-469. PubMed ID: 35148042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-dimensional printing in prosthetics: Method for managing rapid limb volume change.
Nickel E; Barrons K; Hand B; Cataldo A; Hansen A
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2020 Oct; 44(5):355-358. PubMed ID: 32580681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transfemoral sockets with vacuum-assisted suspension comparison of hip kinematics, socket position, contact pressure, and preference: ischial containment versus brimless.
Kahle JT; Highsmith MJ
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2013; 50(9):1241-52. PubMed ID: 24458964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
