These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28095005)

  • 1. Identifying stimuli that cue multiple responses triggers the congruency sequence effect independent of response conflict.
    Weissman DH; Colter KM; Grant LD; Bissett PG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Apr; 43(4):677-689. PubMed ID: 28095005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Turning distractors into targets increases the congruency sequence effect.
    Grant LD; Weissman DH
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jan; 192():31-41. PubMed ID: 30408614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An attentional mechanism for minimizing cross-modal distraction.
    Grant LD; Weissman DH
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Mar; 174():9-16. PubMed ID: 28126490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Resisting distraction and response inhibition trigger similar enhancements of future performance.
    Bissett PG; Grant LD; Weissman DH
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Oct; 180():40-51. PubMed ID: 28843207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Determinants of congruency sequence effects without learning and memory confounds.
    Weissman DH; Jiang J; Egner T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Oct; 40(5):2022-2037. PubMed ID: 25089574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Context-specific proportion congruent effects: Compound-cue contingency learning in disguise.
    Schmidt JR; Lemercier C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 May; 72(5):1119-1130. PubMed ID: 29926760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The congruency sequence effect in a modified prime-probe task indexes response-general control.
    Weissman DH; Grant LD; Jones M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Nov; 46(11):1387-1396. PubMed ID: 32881553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Event-related potential indices of congruency sequence effects without feature integration or contingency learning confounds.
    Larson MJ; Clayson PE; Kirwan CB; Weissman DH
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Jun; 53(6):814-22. PubMed ID: 26854028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Orchestrating Proactive and Reactive Mechanisms for Filtering Distracting Information: Brain-Behavior Relationships Revealed by a Mixed-Design fMRI Study.
    Marini F; Demeter E; Roberts KC; Chelazzi L; Woldorff MG
    J Neurosci; 2016 Jan; 36(3):988-1000. PubMed ID: 26791226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contingent attentional capture triggers the congruency sequence effect.
    Schmidt JR; Weissman DH
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Jul; 159():61-8. PubMed ID: 26036421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The congruency sequence effect transfers across different response modes.
    Weissman DH; Colter K; Drake B; Morgan C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Oct; 161():86-94. PubMed ID: 26343331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reduced Stroop interference under stress: Decreased cue utilisation, not increased executive control.
    Booth RW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jun; 72(6):1522-1529. PubMed ID: 30304992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Let your fingers do the walking: Finger force distinguishes competing accounts of the congruency sequence effect.
    Weissman DH
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Oct; 26(5):1619-1626. PubMed ID: 31228124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Proactive control of irrelevant task rules during cued task switching.
    Bugg JM; Braver TS
    Psychol Res; 2016 Sep; 80(5):860-76. PubMed ID: 26215433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effector system-specific sequential modulations of congruency effects.
    Janczyk M; Leuthold H
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Jun; 25(3):1066-1072. PubMed ID: 28608004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Both congruent and incongruent trials drive the congruency sequence effect: Novel support for an episodic retrieval view of adaptive control in the prime-probe task.
    Dunaway MG; Weissman DH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38647457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multiple expectancies underlie the congruency sequence effect in confound-minimized tasks.
    Erb CD; Aschenbrenner AJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jul; 198():102869. PubMed ID: 31228719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Functional characteristics of control adaptation in intermodal sensory processing.
    Melcher T; Pfister R; Busmann M; Schlüter MC; Leyhe T; Gruber O
    Brain Cogn; 2015 Jun; 96():43-55. PubMed ID: 25917247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stop interfering: Stroop task conflict independence from informational conflict and interference.
    Kalanthroff E; Goldfarb L; Usher M; Henik A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(7):1356-67. PubMed ID: 23163896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contextual within-trial adaptation of cognitive control: Evidence from the combination of conflict tasks.
    Rey-Mermet A; Gade M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1505-32. PubMed ID: 27149295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.