These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28095014)

  • 1. The ability to choose can increase satiation.
    Redden JP; Haws KL; Chen J
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2017 Feb; 112(2):186-200. PubMed ID: 28095014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Collective satiation: How coexperience accelerates a decline in hedonic judgments.
    Bhargave RP; Montgomery NV; Redden JP
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2018 Apr; 114(4):529-546. PubMed ID: 29620400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The psychological pleasure and pain of choosing: when people prefer choosing at the cost of subsequent outcome satisfaction.
    Botti S; Lyengar SS
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2004 Sep; 87(3):312-26. PubMed ID: 15382982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enjoy it again: Repeat experiences are less repetitive than people think.
    O'Brien E
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2019 Apr; 116(4):519-540. PubMed ID: 30896242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Changing memory of food enjoyment to increase food liking, choice and intake.
    Robinson E; Blissett J; Higgs S
    Br J Nutr; 2012 Oct; 108(8):1505-10. PubMed ID: 22214529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Choosing and enjoying violence in narratives.
    Lagrange V; Hiskes B; Woodward C; Li B; Breithaupt F
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0226503. PubMed ID: 31856262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In control of variety. High self-control reduces the effect of variety on food consumption.
    Haws KL; Redden JP
    Appetite; 2013 Oct; 69():196-203. PubMed ID: 23774141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The information gained from witnesses' responses to an initial "blank" lineup.
    Palmer MA; Brewer N; Weber N
    Law Hum Behav; 2012 Oct; 36(5):439-47. PubMed ID: 22468758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of meal variety on expected satiation: evidence for a 'perceived volume' heuristic.
    Keenan GS; Brunstrom JM; Ferriday D
    Appetite; 2015 Jun; 89():10-5. PubMed ID: 25599925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. With a little help for our thoughts: Making it easier to think for pleasure.
    Westgate EC; Wilson TD; Gilbert DT
    Emotion; 2017 Aug; 17(5):828-839. PubMed ID: 28191992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What makes thinking for pleasure pleasurable?
    Westgate EC; Wilson TD; Buttrick NR; Furrer RA; Gilbert DT
    Emotion; 2021 Aug; 21(5):981-989. PubMed ID: 33661664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A trade-off model of intentional thinking for pleasure.
    Raza S; Westgate EC; Buttrick NR; Heintzelman SJ; Furrer RA; Gilbert DT; Libby LK; Wilson TD
    Emotion; 2022 Feb; 22(1):115-128. PubMed ID: 34941322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stimulus specificity but no dishabituation of sensory-specific satiety.
    Havermans RC
    Appetite; 2012 Jun; 58(3):852-5. PubMed ID: 22343169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relationships between expected, online and remembered enjoyment for food products.
    Robinson E
    Appetite; 2014 Mar; 74():55-60. PubMed ID: 24275669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cross-cultural consistency and relativity in the enjoyment of thinking versus doing.
    Buttrick N; Choi H; Wilson TD; Oishi S; Boker SM; Gilbert DT; Alper S; Aveyard M; Cheong W; Čolić MV; Dalgar I; Doğulu C; Karabati S; Kim E; Knežević G; Komiya A; Laclé CO; Ambrosio Lage C; Lazarević LB; Lazarević D; Lins S; Blanco Molina M; Neto F; Orlić A; Petrović B; Arroyo Sibaja M; Torres Fernández D; Vanpaemel W; Voorspoels W; Wilks DC
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2019 Nov; 117(5):e71-e83. PubMed ID: 30035566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Appetite for the selfish gene.
    Ostan I; Poljsak B; Simcic M; Tijskens LM
    Appetite; 2010 Jun; 54(3):442-9. PubMed ID: 20381559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Training impulsive choices for healthy and sustainable food.
    Veling H; Chen Z; Tombrock MC; Verpaalen IAM; Schmitz LI; Dijksterhuis A; Holland RW
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2017 Jun; 23(2):204-215. PubMed ID: 28150960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Expected satiation alone does not predict actual intake of desserts.
    Guillocheau E; Davidenko O; Marsset-Baglieri A; Darcel N; Gaudichon C; Tomé D; Fromentin G
    Appetite; 2018 Apr; 123():183-190. PubMed ID: 29278719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Motivations for choosing various food groups based on individual foods.
    Phan UT; Chambers E
    Appetite; 2016 Oct; 105():204-11. PubMed ID: 27235822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Brain potential indices of novelty processing are associated with preference for amphetamine.
    Gabbay FH; Duncan CC; McDonald CG
    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2010 Dec; 18(6):470-88. PubMed ID: 21186922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.