406 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28095016)
1. Renal Masses Detected on FDG PET/CT in Patients With Lymphoma: Imaging Features Differentiating Primary Renal Cell Carcinomas From Renal Lymphomatous Involvement.
Nicolau C; Sala E; Kumar A; Goldman DA; Schoder H; Hricak H; Vargas HA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Apr; 208(4):849-853. PubMed ID: 28095016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Imaging of renal cell carcinoma in patients with acquired cystic disease of the kidney: comparison
Kitajima K; Yamamoto S; Kawanaka Y; Katsuura T; Fujita M; Nakanishi Y; Yamada Y; Hashimoto T; Suzuki T; Go S; Kanematsu A; Nojima M; Yamakado K
Jpn J Radiol; 2019 Feb; 37(2):165-177. PubMed ID: 30377936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A prospective diagnostic accuracy study of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the evaluation of indeterminate renal masses.
Ozülker T; Ozülker F; Ozbek E; Ozpaçaci T
Nucl Med Commun; 2011 Apr; 32(4):265-72. PubMed ID: 21301376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diffusion-weighted imaging and (18) F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in breast cancer: Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient and maximum standardized uptake values with prognostic factors.
Karan B; Pourbagher A; Torun N
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jun; 43(6):1434-44. PubMed ID: 26663655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical utility of FDG PET/CT for primary and recurrent papillary renal cell carcinoma.
Hou G; Zhao D; Jiang Y; Zhu Z; Huo L; Li F; Cheng W
Cancer Imaging; 2021 Feb; 21(1):25. PubMed ID: 33632314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Utility of FDG PET/CT in the Characterization of Sinonasal Neoplasms: Analysis of Standardized Uptake Value Parameters.
Ozturk K; Gencturk M; Caicedo-Granados E; Li F; Cayci Z
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Dec; 211(6):1354-1360. PubMed ID: 30300005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. FDG PET/CT and CT Findings of Renal Cell Carcinoma With Sarcomatoid Differentiation.
Zhu H; Zhao S; Zuo C; Ren F
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Sep; 215(3):645-651. PubMed ID: 32755159
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Ability of
Ou X; Wang J; Zhou R; Zhu S; Pang F; Zhou Y; Tian R; Ma X
Contrast Media Mol Imaging; 2019; 2019():4507694. PubMed ID: 30930700
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of renal cell carcinoma histological subtype and fuhrman grade using
Nakajima R; Nozaki S; Kondo T; Nagashima Y; Abe K; Sakai S
Eur Radiol; 2017 Nov; 27(11):4866-4873. PubMed ID: 28523353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dual time-point FDG PET/CT and FDG uptake and related enzymes in lymphadenopathies: preliminary results.
Christlieb SB; Strandholdt CN; Olsen BB; Mylam KJ; Larsen TS; Nielsen AL; Rohde M; Gerke O; Olsen KE; Møller MB; Kristensen BW; Abildgaard N; Alavi A; Høilund-Carlsen PF
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Sep; 43(10):1824-36. PubMed ID: 27102266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 18F-FDG PET/CT evaluation of lymphoma with renal involvement: comparison with renal carcinoma.
Ye XH; Chen LH; Wu HB; Feng J; Zhou WL; Yang RM; Bu ZB; Ding Y; Guan J; Wang QS
South Med J; 2010 Jul; 103(7):642-9. PubMed ID: 20531045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinically significant association between the maximum standardized uptake value on 18F-FDG PET and expression of phosphorylated Akt and S6 kinase for prediction of the biological characteristics of renal cell cancer.
Mizuno T; Kamai T; Abe H; Sakamoto S; Kitajima K; Nishihara D; Yuki H; Kambara T; Betsunoh H; Yashi M; Fukabori Y; Kaji Y; Yoshida K
BMC Cancer; 2015; 15():1097. PubMed ID: 25784113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic importance of 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters and total lesion glycolysis in differentiating between benign and malignant adrenal lesions.
Ciftci E; Turgut B; Cakmakcilar A; Erturk SA
Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Sep; 38(9):788-794. PubMed ID: 28692494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance in Lymphoma: Comparison With 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and With the Addition of Magnetic Resonance Diffusion-Weighted Imaging.
Giraudo C; Raderer M; Karanikas G; Weber M; Kiesewetter B; Dolak W; Simonitsch-Klupp I; Mayerhoefer ME
Invest Radiol; 2016 Mar; 51(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 26784400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does dual-time-point
Wu B; Zhao Y; Zhang Y; Tan H; Shi H
Hell J Nucl Med; 2017; 20(1):79-82. PubMed ID: 28315913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. One-month assessment of renal cell carcinoma treated by everolimus using FDG PET/CT predicts progression-free and overall survival.
Ito H; Kondo K; Kawahara T; Kaneta T; Tateishi U; Ueno D; Namura K; Kobayashi K; Miyoshi Y; Yumura Y; Makiyama K; Hayashi N; Hasumi H; Osaka K; Yokomizo Y; Teranishi JI; Hattori Y; Inoue T; Uemura H; Yao M; Nakaigawa N
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol; 2017 May; 79(5):855-861. PubMed ID: 28331985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. FDG PET/CT after first molecular targeted therapy predicts survival of patients with renal cell carcinoma.
Nakaigawa N; Kondo K; Kaneta T; Tateishi U; Minamimoto R; Namura K; Ueno D; Kobayashi K; Kishida T; Ikeda I; Hasumi H; Makiyama K; Hayashi N; Osaka K; Muraoka K; Izumi K; Kawahara T; Teranishi JI; Miyoshi Y; Yumura Y; Uemura H; Inoue T; Yao M
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol; 2018 Apr; 81(4):739-744. PubMed ID: 29464355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Differentiating renal pelvic cancer from renal cell carcinoma with 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography.
Dursun M; Ozbek E; Otunctemur A; Besiroglu H
J Cancer Res Ther; 2021; 17(4):901-905. PubMed ID: 34528539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 18F-FDG PET/CT in primary brain lymphoma.
Albano D; Bosio G; Bertoli M; Giubbini R; Bertagna F
J Neurooncol; 2018 Feb; 136(3):577-583. PubMed ID: 29147860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic performance and prognostic value of preoperative
Chen S; Zhao Y; Tang Q; Wu C; Wang A; Ma L; Zhang X; Chen J; Gao Y; Liao X; Feng N; Fan Y; Zhang J; Li X; Liu M
Cancer Imaging; 2022 Nov; 22(1):65. PubMed ID: 36435856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]