233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28095506)
1. A Comparison of the Corrected Intraocular Pressure Obtained by the Corvis ST and Reichert 7CR Tonometers in Glaucoma Patients.
Nakao Y; Kiuchi Y; Okimoto S
PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0170206. PubMed ID: 28095506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure using Corvis ST and comparison of the Corvis ST, noncontact tonometer, and Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma.
Nakao Y; Kiuchi Y; Okumichi H
PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0238395. PubMed ID: 32966284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers.
Kotecha A; White E; Schlottmann PG; Garway-Heath DF
Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):730-7. PubMed ID: 20122737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of thin, thick, and normal corneas on Goldmann intraocular pressure measurements and correction formulae in individual eyes.
Park SJ; Ang GS; Nicholas S; Wells AP
Ophthalmology; 2012 Mar; 119(3):443-9. PubMed ID: 22035576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Pachymetry and intraocular pressure measurement by corneal visualization Scheimpflug technology (Corvis ST): A clinical comparison to the gold standard].
Steinberg J; Mehlan J; Frings A; Druchkiv V; Richard G; Katz T; Linke SJ
Ophthalmologe; 2015 Sep; 112(9):770-7. PubMed ID: 25501931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A new tonometer--the Corvis ST tonometer: clinical comparison with noncontact and Goldmann applanation tonometers.
Hong J; Xu J; Wei A; Deng SX; Cui X; Yu X; Sun X
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Jan; 54(1):659-65. PubMed ID: 23307970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Comparison between Goldmann, Icare Pro and Corvis ST tonometry].
Bañeros-Rojas P; Martinez de la Casa JM; Arribas-Pardo P; Berrozpe-Villabona C; Toro-Utrera P; García-Feijoó J
Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2014 Jul; 89(7):260-4. PubMed ID: 24814401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intraocular pressure measurement with Corvis ST in comparison with applanation tonometry and Tomey non-contact tonometry.
Luebke J; Bryniok L; Neuburger M; Jordan JF; Boehringer D; Reinhard T; Wecker T; Anton A
Int Ophthalmol; 2019 Nov; 39(11):2517-2521. PubMed ID: 30968328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Corvis ST Tonometer for Measuring Postoperative IOP in LASIK Patients.
Hong J; Yu Z; Jiang C; Zhou X; Liu Z; Sun X; Xu J
Optom Vis Sci; 2015 May; 92(5):589-95. PubMed ID: 25871871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Changes in intraocular pressure values measured with noncontact tonometer (NCT), ocular response analyzer (ORA) and corvis scheimpflug technology tonometer (CST) in the early phase after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).
Shen Y; Su X; Liu X; Miao H; Fang X; Zhou X
BMC Ophthalmol; 2016 Nov; 16(1):205. PubMed ID: 27863469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intraocular pressure measured by dynamic contour tonometer and ocular response analyzer in normal tension glaucoma.
Morita T; Shoji N; Kamiya K; Hagishima M; Fujimura F; Shimizu K
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2010 Jan; 248(1):73-7. PubMed ID: 19693527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of intraocular pressure adjusted by central corneal thickness or corneal biomechanical properties as measured in glaucomatous eyes using noncontact tonometers and the Goldmann applanation tonometer.
Yaoeda K; Fukushima A; Shirakashi M; Fukuchi T
Clin Ophthalmol; 2016; 10():829-34. PubMed ID: 27274187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of a novel Scheimpflug-based non-contact tonometer in healthy subjects and patients with ocular hypertension and glaucoma.
Reznicek L; Muth D; Kampik A; Neubauer AS; Hirneiss C
Br J Ophthalmol; 2013 Nov; 97(11):1410-4. PubMed ID: 23969314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Between Goldmann Applanation Tonometry and Reichert 7 Noncontact Tonometry.
Güngör SG; Akman A; Yazici AC
J Glaucoma; 2015 Aug; 24(6):438-41. PubMed ID: 24145288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison between Corvis and other tonometers in healthy eyes.
Lanza M; Iaccarino S; Cennamo M; Irregolare C; Romano V; Carnevale UA
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2015 Apr; 38(2):94-8. PubMed ID: 25467287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effectiveness of the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, the Dynamic Contour Tonometer, the Ocular Response Analyzer and the Corvis ST in Measuring Intraocular Pressure following FS-LASIK.
Bao F; Huang W; Zhu R; Lu N; Wang Y; Li H; Wu S; Lin H; Wang J; Zheng X; Huang J; Li Y; Wang Q; Elsheikh A
Curr Eye Res; 2020 Feb; 45(2):144-152. PubMed ID: 31869261
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. IOP measurement in silicone oil tamponade eyes by Corvis ST tonometer, Goldmann applanation tonometry and non-contact tonometry.
Zhang Y; Zheng L; Bian A; Zhou Q
Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Apr; 38(2):697-703. PubMed ID: 28444523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relationship between novel intraocular pressure measurement from Corvis ST and central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis.
Matsuura M; Murata H; Fujino Y; Yanagisawa M; Nakao Y; Tokumo K; Nakakura S; Kiuchi Y; Asaoka R
Br J Ophthalmol; 2020 Apr; 104(4):563-568. PubMed ID: 31362932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of cornea on intraocular pressure measurement by ICARE PRO and ORA.
Pluháček F; Unzeitigová A; Marešová K; Rybář J
Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2019; 75(3):111-118. PubMed ID: 31779459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relationship between corneal biomechanical properties, central corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure across the spectrum of glaucoma.
Kaushik S; Pandav SS; Banger A; Aggarwal K; Gupta A
Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 May; 153(5):840-849.e2. PubMed ID: 22310080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
