These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28095543)

  • 1. Clinical Evaluation of Hair Removal Using an 810 nm Diode Laser With a Novel Scanning Device.
    Courtney E; Goldberg DJ
    J Drugs Dermatol; 2016 Nov; 15(11):1330-1333. PubMed ID: 28095543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. One-year follow-up results of hair removal using an 810 nm diode laser.
    Goldberg DJ
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2018 Oct; 17(5):775-778. PubMed ID: 30251358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term Comparison of a Large Spot Vacuum Assisted Handpiece vs the Small Spot Size Traditional Handpiece of the 800 nm Diode Laser.
    Youssef NJ; Rizk AG; Ibrahimi OA; Tannous ZS
    J Drugs Dermatol; 2017 Sep; 16(9):893-898. PubMed ID: 28915284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prospective Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of a 1060-nm Large Spot Size, Vacuum-Assisted Hair Removal Diode Laser System in Asian/Pacific Fitzpatrick's Skin Types IV-V Patients.
    Tahiliani ST; Tahiliani HS
    J Drugs Dermatol; 2016 Nov; 15(11):1427-1434. PubMed ID: 28095566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-term efficacy of linear-scanning 808 nm diode laser for hair removal compared to a scanned alexandrite laser.
    Grunewald S; Bodendorf MO; Zygouris A; Simon JC; Paasch U
    Lasers Surg Med; 2014 Jan; 46(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 24127195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-term clinical evaluation of a 800-nm long-pulsed diode laser with a large spot size and vacuum-assisted suction for hair removal.
    Ibrahimi OA; Kilmer SL
    Dermatol Surg; 2012 Jun; 38(6):912-7. PubMed ID: 22455549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fixed, low radiant exposure vs. incremental radiant exposure approach for diode laser hair reduction: a randomized, split axilla, comparative single-blinded trial.
    Pavlović MD; Adamič M; Nenadić D
    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2015 Dec; 29(12):2377-81. PubMed ID: 26299540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Safety and efficacy of low fluence, high repetition rate versus high fluence, low repetition rate 810-nm diode laser for axillary hair removal in Chinese women.
    Li W; Liu C; Chen Z; Cai L; Zhou C; Xu Q; Li H; Zhang J
    J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2016 Nov; 18(7):393-396. PubMed ID: 27419804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A split axilla comparison study of axillary hair removal with low fluence high repetition rate 810 nm diode laser vs. high fluence low repetition rate 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser.
    Wanitphakdeedecha R; Thanomkitti K; Sethabutra P; Eimpunth S; Manuskiatti W
    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2012 Sep; 26(9):1133-6. PubMed ID: 21923659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Novel 755-nm diode laser vs. conventional 755-nm scanned alexandrite laser: Side-by-side comparison pilot study for thorax and axillary hair removal.
    Paasch U; Wagner JA; Paasch HW
    J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2015; 17(4):189-93. PubMed ID: 25607745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Low fluence-high repetition rate diode laser hair removal 12-month evaluation: reducing pain and risks while keeping clinical efficacy.
    Barolet D
    Lasers Surg Med; 2012 Apr; 44(4):277-81. PubMed ID: 22437967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Photoepilation with a diode laser vs. intense pulsed light: a randomized, intrapatient left-to-right trial.
    Klein A; Steinert S; Baeumler W; Landthaler M; Babilas P
    Br J Dermatol; 2013 Jun; 168(6):1287-93. PubMed ID: 23278132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of long-pulsed diode and long-pulsed alexandrite lasers for hair removal: a long-term clinical and histologic study.
    Handrick C; Alster TS
    Dermatol Surg; 2001 Jul; 27(7):622-6. PubMed ID: 11442611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Safety and efficacy of low-fluence, high-repetition rate versus high-fluence, low-repetition rate 810-nm diode laser for permanent hair removal--a split-face comparison study.
    Pai GS; Bhat PS; Mallya H; Gold M
    J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2011 Aug; 13(4):134-7. PubMed ID: 21692640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prospective, comparative evaluation of three laser systems used individually and in combination for axillary hair removal.
    Rao J; Goldman MP
    Dermatol Surg; 2005 Dec; 31(12):1671-6; discussion 1677. PubMed ID: 16336886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Permanent laser hair removal with low fluence high repetition rate versus high fluence low repetition rate 810 nm diode laser--a split leg comparison study.
    Braun M
    J Drugs Dermatol; 2009 Nov; 8(11 Suppl):s14-7. PubMed ID: 19916262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Novel laser hair removal in all skin types.
    Gold MH; Weiss E; Biron J
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2023 Apr; 22(4):1261-1265. PubMed ID: 36756716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the effect of diode laser versus intense pulsed light in axillary hair removal.
    Ormiga P; Ishida CE; Boechat A; Ramos-E-Silva M
    Dermatol Surg; 2014 Oct; 40(10):1061-9. PubMed ID: 25229781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of two 810 diode lasers for hair removal: low fluence, multiple pass versus a high fluence, single pass technique.
    Koo B; Ball K; Tremaine AM; Zachary CB
    Lasers Surg Med; 2014 Apr; 46(4):270-4. PubMed ID: 24752608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of high-fluence, single-pass diode laser to low-fluence, multiple-pass diode laser for laser hair reduction with 18 months of follow up.
    Braun M
    J Drugs Dermatol; 2011 Jan; 10(1):62-5. PubMed ID: 21197525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.