These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28095595)

  • 1. Critical Infrastructure Vulnerability to Spatially Localized Failures with Applications to Chinese Railway System.
    Ouyang M; Tian H; Wang Z; Hong L; Mao Z
    Risk Anal; 2019 Jan; 39(1):180-194. PubMed ID: 28095595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Limits of Predictability of Cascading Overload Failures in Spatially-Embedded Networks with Distributed Flows.
    Moussawi A; Derzsy N; Lin X; Szymanski BK; Korniss G
    Sci Rep; 2017 Sep; 7(1):11729. PubMed ID: 28916772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An Optimization-Based Framework for the Identification of Vulnerabilities in Electric Power Grids Exposed to Natural Hazards.
    Fang YP; Sansavini G; Zio E
    Risk Anal; 2019 Sep; 39(9):1949-1969. PubMed ID: 30779857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Localized attacks on spatially embedded networks with dependencies.
    Berezin Y; Bashan A; Danziger MM; Li D; Havlin S
    Sci Rep; 2015 Mar; 5():8934. PubMed ID: 25757572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Infrastructure Vulnerability Assessment Model (I-VAM).
    Ezell BC
    Risk Anal; 2007 Jun; 27(3):571-83. PubMed ID: 17640208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Topological performance measures as surrogates for physical flow models for risk and vulnerability analysis for electric power systems.
    LaRocca S; Johansson J; Hassel H; Guikema S
    Risk Anal; 2015 Apr; 35(4):608-23. PubMed ID: 26018246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Integration of Critical Infrastructure and Societal Consequence Models: Impact on Swedish Power System Mitigation Decisions.
    Svegrup L; Johansson J; Hassel H
    Risk Anal; 2019 Sep; 39(9):1970-1996. PubMed ID: 30682217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sensor4PRI: a sensor platform for the protection of railway infrastructures.
    Cañete E; Chen J; Díaz M; Llopis L; Rubio B
    Sensors (Basel); 2015 Feb; 15(3):4996-5019. PubMed ID: 25734648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Data on predictive resilience of interdependent water and transportation infrastructures: A sociotechnical approach.
    Aslani B; Mohebbi S
    Data Brief; 2021 Dec; 39():107512. PubMed ID: 34765704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Comprehensive Risk Analysis of Transportation Networks Affected by Rainfall-Induced Multihazards.
    Liu K; Wang M; Cao Y; Zhu W; Wu J; Yan X
    Risk Anal; 2018 Aug; 38(8):1618-1633. PubMed ID: 29377210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cascade vulnerability for risk analysis of water infrastructure.
    Sitzenfrei R; Mair M; Möderl M; Rauch W
    Water Sci Technol; 2011; 64(9):1885-91. PubMed ID: 22020483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do topological models provide good information about electricity infrastructure vulnerability?
    Hines P; Cotilla-Sanchez E; Blumsack S
    Chaos; 2010 Sep; 20(3):033122. PubMed ID: 20887062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mitotic activity and specification of fibrocyte subtypes in the developing rat cochlear lateral wall.
    Mutai H; Nagashima R; Fujii M; Matsunaga T
    Neuroscience; 2009 Nov; 163(4):1255-63. PubMed ID: 19660533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modeling flood induced interdependencies among hydroelectricity generating infrastructures.
    Sultana S; Chen Z
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Aug; 90(11):3272-82. PubMed ID: 19570603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spatial Vulnerability of Network Systems under Spatially Local Hazards.
    Hu XB; Li H; Guo X; van Gelder PHAJM; Shi P
    Risk Anal; 2019 Jan; 39(1):162-179. PubMed ID: 29570836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Monitoring System for Railway Infrastructure Elements Based on Thermal Imaging Analysis.
    Stypułkowski K; Gołda P; Lewczuk K; Tomaszewska J
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 May; 21(11):. PubMed ID: 34073050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparisons of purely topological model, betweenness based model and direct current power flow model to analyze power grid vulnerability.
    Ouyang M
    Chaos; 2013 Jun; 23(2):023114. PubMed ID: 23822479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reducing Cascading Failure Risk by Increasing Infrastructure Network Interdependence.
    Korkali M; Veneman JG; Tivnan BF; Bagrow JP; Hines PD
    Sci Rep; 2017 Mar; 7():44499. PubMed ID: 28317835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modeling joint restoration strategies for interdependent infrastructure systems.
    Zhang C; Kong J; Simonovic SP
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0195727. PubMed ID: 29649300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ranking the risks from multiple hazards in a small community.
    Li H; Apostolakis GE; Gifun J; VanSchalkwyk W; Leite S; Barber D
    Risk Anal; 2009 Mar; 29(3):438-56. PubMed ID: 19076325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.