These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28096408)

  • 1. Rhythm judgments reveal a frequency asymmetry in the perception and neural coding of sound synchrony.
    Wojtczak M; Mehta AH; Oxenham AJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Jan; 114(5):1201-1206. PubMed ID: 28096408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Superior time perception for lower musical pitch explains why bass-ranged instruments lay down musical rhythms.
    Hove MJ; Marie C; Bruce IC; Trainor LJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Jul; 111(28):10383-8. PubMed ID: 24982142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Explaining the high voice superiority effect in polyphonic music: evidence from cortical evoked potentials and peripheral auditory models.
    Trainor LJ; Marie C; Bruce IC; Bidelman GM
    Hear Res; 2014 Feb; 308():60-70. PubMed ID: 23916754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perception of across-frequency asynchrony and the role of cochlear delays.
    Wojtczak M; Beim JA; Micheyl C; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):363-77. PubMed ID: 22280598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Superoptimal Perceptual Integration Suggests a Place-Based Representation of Pitch at High Frequencies.
    Lau BK; Mehta AH; Oxenham AJ
    J Neurosci; 2017 Sep; 37(37):9013-9021. PubMed ID: 28821642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Subcortical neural synchrony and absolute thresholds predict frequency discrimination independently.
    Marmel F; Linley D; Carlyon RP; Gockel HE; Hopkins K; Plack CJ
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2013 Oct; 14(5):757-66. PubMed ID: 23760984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neural tracking of the musical beat is enhanced by low-frequency sounds.
    Lenc T; Keller PE; Varlet M; Nozaradan S
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Aug; 115(32):8221-8226. PubMed ID: 30037989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Early development of polyphonic sound encoding and the high voice superiority effect.
    Marie C; Trainor LJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 May; 57():50-8. PubMed ID: 24613759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development of the adaptive music perception test.
    Kirchberger MJ; Russo FA
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):217-28. PubMed ID: 25350404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Age-related difference in melodic pitch perception is probably mediated by temporal processing: empirical and computational evidence.
    Russo FA; Ives DT; Goy H; Pichora-Fuller MK; Patterson RD
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 22367092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cochlear implant-mediated perception of music.
    Limb CJ
    Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2006 Oct; 14(5):337-40. PubMed ID: 16974148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mismatch negativity of higher amplitude for melodic ascendance than descendance.
    Ruusuvirta TT; Astikainen P
    Neuroreport; 2012 Mar; 23(4):220-3. PubMed ID: 22246244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neural representation of a melodic motif: Effects of polyphonic contexts.
    Huberth M; Fujioka T
    Brain Cogn; 2017 Feb; 111():144-155. PubMed ID: 27940303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What can we learn about beat perception by comparing brain signals and stimulus envelopes?
    Henry MJ; Herrmann B; Grahn JA
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0172454. PubMed ID: 28225796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Infant music perception: domain-general or domain-specific mechanisms?
    Trehub SE; Hannon EE
    Cognition; 2006 May; 100(1):73-99. PubMed ID: 16380107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ambiguous musical figures. Sequential grouping by common pitch and sound-source location versus simultaneous grouping by temporal synchrony.
    Turgeon M; Bregman AS
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2001 Jun; 930():375-81. PubMed ID: 11458843
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Effect of Cochlear Damage on the Sensitivity to Harmonicity.
    Bonnard D; Dauman R; Semal C; Demany L
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 27992390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What breaks a melody: perceiving F0 and intensity sequences with a cochlear implant.
    Cousineau M; Demany L; Meyer B; Pressnitzer D
    Hear Res; 2010 Oct; 269(1-2):34-41. PubMed ID: 20674733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pitch perception and auditory stream segregation: implications for hearing loss and cochlear implants.
    Oxenham AJ
    Trends Amplif; 2008 Dec; 12(4):316-31. PubMed ID: 18974203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. EEG Frequency-Tagging and Input-Output Comparison in Rhythm Perception.
    Nozaradan S; Keller PE; Rossion B; Mouraux A
    Brain Topogr; 2018 Mar; 31(2):153-160. PubMed ID: 29127530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.