These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2809651)

  • 1. Meta-analysis in medical research: strong encouragement for higher quality in individual research efforts.
    O'Rourke K; Detsky AS
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1989; 42(10):1021-4. PubMed ID: 2809651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Methodology and reporting of meta-analyses in the neurosurgical literature.
    Klimo P; Thompson CJ; Ragel BT; Boop FA
    J Neurosurg; 2014 Apr; 120(4):796-810. PubMed ID: 24460488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Results reporting in single case experiments and single case meta-analysis.
    Vannest KJ; Peltier C; Haas A
    Res Dev Disabil; 2018 Aug; 79():10-18. PubMed ID: 29960830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Meta-analysis: recent developments in quantitative methods for literature reviews.
    Rosenthal R; DiMatteo MR
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2001; 52():59-82. PubMed ID: 11148299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pro: Meta-analysis: the case for.
    Mudge DW; Webster AC; Johnson DW
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2016 Jun; 31(6):875-80. PubMed ID: 27217392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Meta-analysis at 20: retrospect and prospect.
    Kavale KA
    Eval Health Prof; 1995 Dec; 18(4):349-69. PubMed ID: 10153162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality of meta-analysis in nursing fields: An exploration based on the JBI guidelines.
    Hou Y; Tian J; Zhang J; Yun R; Zhang Z; Chen KH; Zhang C; Wang B
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0177648. PubMed ID: 28542330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Summing up evidence: one answer is not always enough.
    Lau J; Ioannidis JP; Schmid CH
    Lancet; 1998 Jan; 351(9096):123-7. PubMed ID: 9439507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Understanding and Appraising Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis.
    Mittal N; Goyal M; Mittal PK
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2017; 41(5):317-326. PubMed ID: 28872991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Strategies to improve the credibility of meta-analyses in spine surgery: a systematic survey.
    Evaniew N; van der Watt L; Bhandari M; Ghert M; Aleem I; Drew B; Guyatt G
    Spine J; 2015 Sep; 15(9):2066-76. PubMed ID: 26002725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Meta-analysis: a tool for clinical and experimental research in psychiatry.
    González-Castro TB; Tovilla-Zárate CA
    Nord J Psychiatry; 2014 May; 68(4):243-50. PubMed ID: 24040998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing the reporting and scientific quality of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials of treatments for anxiety disorders.
    Bereza BG; Machado M; Einarson TR
    Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Oct; 42(10):1402-9. PubMed ID: 18728102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: when they are useful and when to be careful.
    Noordzij M; Hooft L; Dekker FW; Zoccali C; Jager KJ
    Kidney Int; 2009 Dec; 76(11):1130-6. PubMed ID: 19727062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Network meta-analysis: an introduction for clinicians.
    Rouse B; Chaimani A; Li T
    Intern Emerg Med; 2017 Feb; 12(1):103-111. PubMed ID: 27913917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Questions for meta-analysis.
    Sohn D
    Psychol Rep; 1997 Aug; 81(1):3-15. PubMed ID: 9293188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature.
    Gagnier JJ; Kellam PJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Jun; 95(11):e771-7. PubMed ID: 23780547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis: studies of studies.
    Engberg S
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2008; 35(3):258-65. PubMed ID: 18496080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adding up the evidence: systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Noordzij M; Zoccali C; Dekker FW; Jager KJ
    Nephron Clin Pract; 2011; 119(4):c310-6. PubMed ID: 22135790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Meta-synthesis: a research methodology].
    Carrillo-González GM; Gómez-Ramírez OJ; Vargas-Rosero E
    Rev Salud Publica (Bogota); 2007; 9(4):609-17. PubMed ID: 18209828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.