133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28097603)
1. Comprehensive preclinical evaluation of a multi-physics model of liver tumor radiofrequency ablation.
Audigier C; Mansi T; Delingette H; Rapaka S; Passerini T; Mihalef V; Jolly MP; Pop R; Diana M; Soler L; Kamen A; Comaniciu D; Ayache N
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 Sep; 12(9):1543-1559. PubMed ID: 28097603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Radiofrequency ablation in a porcine liver model: effects of transcatheter arterial embolization with iodized oil on ablation time, maximum output, and coagulation diameter as well as angiographic characteristics.
Nakai M; Sato M; Sahara S; Kawai N; Tanihata H; Kimura M; Terada M
World J Gastroenterol; 2007 May; 13(20):2841-5. PubMed ID: 17569120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intrahepatic radiofrequency ablation versus electrochemical treatment in vivo.
Czymek R; Nassrallah J; Gebhard M; Schmidt A; Limmer S; Kleemann M; Bruch HP; Hildebrand P
Surg Oncol; 2012 Jun; 21(2):79-86. PubMed ID: 21115239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Value or waste: Perfusion imaging following radiofrequency ablation - early experience.
Thieme SF; Vahldiek JL; Tummler K; Poch F; Gemeinhardt O; Hiebl B; Lehmann KS; Hamm B; Niehues SM
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2015; 61(2):323-31. PubMed ID: 26410879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [A comparison of the use of electrochemical treatment and radio frequency ablation in porcine liver].
Czymek R; Gebhard M; Lubienski A; Roblick U; Bruch HP; Hildebrand P
Zentralbl Chir; 2011 Aug; 136(4):379-85. PubMed ID: 21766275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bimodal electric tissue ablation-modified radiofrequency ablation with a le veen electrode in a pig model.
Dobbins C; Wemyss-Holden SA; Cockburn J; Maddern GJ
J Surg Res; 2008 Jan; 144(1):111-6. PubMed ID: 17640668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimal vascular flows cause strong heat sink effects in hepatic radiofrequency ablation ex vivo.
Lehmann KS; Poch FG; Rieder C; Schenk A; Stroux A; Frericks BB; Gemeinhardt O; Holmer C; Kreis ME; Ritz JP; Zurbuchen U
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2016 Aug; 23(8):508-16. PubMed ID: 27338856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radiofrequency Ablation of Liver Tumors: No Difference in the Ablation Zone Volume Between Cirrhotic and Healthy Liver.
Cassinotto C; Denys A; Gay F; Duran R; Hocquelet A; Piron L; Guiu B
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2018 Jun; 41(6):905-911. PubMed ID: 29484466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of Software for Patient-Specific Real-Time Simulation of Hepatic Radiofrequency Ablation.
Hoffer EK; Borsic A; Patel SD
Acad Radiol; 2022 Oct; 29(10):e219-e227. PubMed ID: 35039220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. No-touch radiofrequency ablation using multiple electrodes: An in vivo comparison study of switching monopolar versus switching bipolar modes in porcine livers.
Chang W; Lee JM; Yoon JH; Lee DH; Lee SM; Lee KB; Kim BR; Kim TH; Lee S; Han JK
PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0176350. PubMed ID: 28445542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lattice Boltzmann method for fast patient-specific simulation of liver tumor ablation from CT images.
Audigier C; Mansi T; Delingette H; Rapaka S; Mihalef V; Sharma P; Carnegie D; Boctor E; Choti M; Kamen A; Comaniciu D; Ayache N
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2013; 16(Pt 3):323-30. PubMed ID: 24505777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bimodal electric tissue ablation (BETA): a study on ablation size when the anode is placed on the peritoneum and the liver.
Tiong LU; Finnie JW; Field JB; Maddern GJ
J Surg Res; 2012 Jul; 176(1):114-20. PubMed ID: 21470626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Temperature-dependent electrode repositioning for multiple overlapping radiofrequency ablation in ex vivo porcine livers.
Wong SN; Santi GE; Nurjadin H; Aguilar R; Gosalvez-Pe S
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2010 Nov; 21(11):1733-8. PubMed ID: 20884231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multipolar RFA of the liver: Influence of intrahepatic vessels on ablation zones and appropriateness of CECT in detecting ablation dimensions - Results of an in-vivo porcine liver model.
Vahldiek JL; Erxleben C; Bressem KK; Gemeinhardt O; Poch F; Hiebl B; Lehmann KS; Hamm B; Niehues SM
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2018; 70(4):467-476. PubMed ID: 30347610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Experimental study of radiofrequency ablation of liver in swine].
Zhang XM; Wang X; Wan YL; Chen GW; Li RJ; Chen MH
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Apr; 93(15):1178-81. PubMed ID: 23902892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. No-Touch Radiofrequency Ablation: A Comparison of Switching Bipolar and Switching Monopolar Ablation in
Chang W; Lee JM; Lee SM; Han JK
Korean J Radiol; 2017; 18(2):279-288. PubMed ID: 28246508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MR monitoring of NaCl-enhanced radiofrequency ablations: observations on low- and high-field-strength MR images with pathologic correlation.
Nour SG; Goldberg SN; Wacker FK; Rafie S; Paul S; Heidenreich JO; Rodgers M; Abdul-Karim FW; Duerk JL; Lewin JS
Radiology; 2010 Feb; 254(2):449-59. PubMed ID: 20089724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Double radiofrequency ablation is more extensive with a spherical zone shape compared to single ablation in a pig liver model.
Oshio A; Tamaki K; Shimizu I; Fukuno H; Urata M; Ito S; Sano N
J Med Invest; 2007 Feb; 54(1-2):28-34. PubMed ID: 17380011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Radiofrequency ablation of porcine liver in vivo: effects of blood flow and treatment time on lesion size.
Patterson EJ; Scudamore CH; Owen DA; Nagy AG; Buczkowski AK
Ann Surg; 1998 Apr; 227(4):559-65. PubMed ID: 9563546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. RF-ablation pattern shaping employing switching channels of dual bipolar needle electrodes: ex vivo results.
Ziegle J; Audigier C; Krug J; Ali G; Kim Y; Boctor EM; Friebe M
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2018 Jun; 13(6):905-916. PubMed ID: 29679219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
