153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28097710)
1. Comparative evaluation of label-free quantification methods for shotgun proteomics.
Bubis JA; Levitsky LI; Ivanov MV; Tarasova IA; Gorshkov MV
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom; 2017 Apr; 31(7):606-612. PubMed ID: 28097710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative proteomic analysis of microdissected breast cancer tissues: comparison of label-free and SILAC-based quantification with shotgun, directed, and targeted MS approaches.
Liu NQ; Dekker LJ; Stingl C; Güzel C; De Marchi T; Martens JW; Foekens JA; Luider TM; Umar A
J Proteome Res; 2013 Oct; 12(10):4627-41. PubMed ID: 23957277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative evaluation of label-free SINQ normalized spectral index quantitation in the central proteomics facilities pipeline.
Trudgian DC; Ridlova G; Fischer R; Mackeen MM; Ternette N; Acuto O; Kessler BM; Thomas B
Proteomics; 2011 Jul; 11(14):2790-7. PubMed ID: 21656681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Semi-supervised learning for peptide identification from shotgun proteomics datasets.
Käll L; Canterbury JD; Weston J; Noble WS; MacCoss MJ
Nat Methods; 2007 Nov; 4(11):923-5. PubMed ID: 17952086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of label-free and label-based strategies for proteome analysis of hepatoma cell lines.
Megger DA; Pott LL; Ahrens M; Padden J; Bracht T; Kuhlmann K; Eisenacher M; Meyer HE; Sitek B
Biochim Biophys Acta; 2014 May; 1844(5):967-76. PubMed ID: 23954498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Systematic comparison of label-free, metabolic labeling, and isobaric chemical labeling for quantitative proteomics on LTQ Orbitrap Velos.
Li Z; Adams RM; Chourey K; Hurst GB; Hettich RL; Pan C
J Proteome Res; 2012 Mar; 11(3):1582-90. PubMed ID: 22188275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. RIBAR and xRIBAR: Methods for reproducible relative MS/MS-based label-free protein quantification.
Colaert N; Gevaert K; Martens L
J Proteome Res; 2011 Jul; 10(7):3183-9. PubMed ID: 21604685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. SWATH enables precise label-free quantification on proteome scale.
Huang Q; Yang L; Luo J; Guo L; Wang Z; Yang X; Jin W; Fang Y; Ye J; Shan B; Zhang Y
Proteomics; 2015 Apr; 15(7):1215-23. PubMed ID: 25560523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of MS2-based label-free quantitative proteomic techniques with regards to accuracy and precision.
Colaert N; Vandekerckhove J; Gevaert K; Martens L
Proteomics; 2011 Mar; 11(6):1110-3. PubMed ID: 21365758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Estimating relative abundances of proteins from shotgun proteomics data.
McIlwain S; Mathews M; Bereman MS; Rubel EW; MacCoss MJ; Noble WS
BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Nov; 13():308. PubMed ID: 23164367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In-depth evaluation of software tools for data-independent acquisition based label-free quantification.
Kuharev J; Navarro P; Distler U; Jahn O; Tenzer S
Proteomics; 2015 Sep; 15(18):3140-51. PubMed ID: 25545627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A peptide-retrieval strategy enables significant improvement of quantitative performance without compromising confidence of identification.
Tu C; Shen S; Sheng Q; Shyr Y; Qu J
J Proteomics; 2017 Jan; 152():276-282. PubMed ID: 27903464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance metrics for liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry systems in proteomics analyses.
Rudnick PA; Clauser KR; Kilpatrick LE; Tchekhovskoi DV; Neta P; Blonder N; Billheimer DD; Blackman RK; Bunk DM; Cardasis HL; Ham AJ; Jaffe JD; Kinsinger CR; Mesri M; Neubert TA; Schilling B; Tabb DL; Tegeler TJ; Vega-Montoto L; Variyath AM; Wang M; Wang P; Whiteaker JR; Zimmerman LJ; Carr SA; Fisher SJ; Gibson BW; Paulovich AG; Regnier FE; Rodriguez H; Spiegelman C; Tempst P; Liebler DC; Stein SE
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2010 Feb; 9(2):225-41. PubMed ID: 19837981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparing the Diagnostic Classification Accuracy of iTRAQ, Peak-Area, Spectral-Counting, and emPAI Methods for Relative Quantification in Expression Proteomics.
Dowle AA; Wilson J; Thomas JR
J Proteome Res; 2016 Oct; 15(10):3550-3562. PubMed ID: 27546623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tools for label-free peptide quantification.
Nahnsen S; Bielow C; Reinert K; Kohlbacher O
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2013 Mar; 12(3):549-56. PubMed ID: 23250051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improved accuracy for label-free absolute quantification of proteome by combining the Absolute Protein EXpression profiling algorithm and summed tandem mass spectrometric total ion current.
Wu Q; Shan Y; Qu Y; Jiang H; Yuan H; Liu J; Zhang S; Liang Z; Zhang L; Zhang Y
Analyst; 2014 Jan; 139(1):138-46. PubMed ID: 24195105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of normalization methods on GeLC-MS/MS label-free spectral counting data to correct for variation during proteomic workflows.
Gokce E; Shuford CM; Franck WL; Dean RA; Muddiman DC
J Am Soc Mass Spectrom; 2011 Dec; 22(12):2199-208. PubMed ID: 21952779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cross-correlation of spectral count ranking to validate quantitative proteome measurements.
Kannaste O; Suomi T; Salmi J; Uusipaikka E; Nevalainen O; Corthals GL
J Proteome Res; 2014 Apr; 13(4):1957-68. PubMed ID: 24611565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Label-Free Quantitative Proteomics in Yeast.
Léger T; Garcia C; Videlier M; Camadro JM
Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1361():289-307. PubMed ID: 26483028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Chromatogram libraries improve peptide detection and quantification by data independent acquisition mass spectrometry.
Searle BC; Pino LK; Egertson JD; Ting YS; Lawrence RT; MacLean BX; Villén J; MacCoss MJ
Nat Commun; 2018 Dec; 9(1):5128. PubMed ID: 30510204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
