152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28099771)
1. Purging putative siblings from population genetic data sets: a cautionary view.
Waples RS; Anderson EC
Mol Ecol; 2017 Mar; 26(5):1211-1224. PubMed ID: 28099771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bayesian pedigree inference with small numbers of single nucleotide polymorphisms via a factor-graph representation.
Anderson EC; Ng TC
Theor Popul Biol; 2016 Feb; 107():39-51. PubMed ID: 26450523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Unbiased relatedness estimation in structured populations.
Wang J
Genetics; 2011 Mar; 187(3):887-901. PubMed ID: 21212234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Genetic estimates of contemporary effective population size: to what time periods do the estimates apply?
Waples RS
Mol Ecol; 2005 Oct; 14(11):3335-52. PubMed ID: 16156807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The aunt and uncle effect: an empirical evaluation of the confounding influence of full sibs of parents on pedigree reconstruction.
Olsen JB; Busack C; Britt J; Bentzen P
J Hered; 2001; 92(3):243-7. PubMed ID: 11447239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An improvement on the maximum likelihood reconstruction of pedigrees from marker data.
Wang J
Heredity (Edinb); 2013 Aug; 111(2):165-74. PubMed ID: 23612692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Estimating pairwise relatedness in a small sample of individuals.
Wang J
Heredity (Edinb); 2017 Nov; 119(5):302-313. PubMed ID: 28853716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accounting for missing data in the estimation of contemporary genetic effective population size (N(e) ).
Peel D; Waples RS; Macbeth GM; Do C; Ovenden JR
Mol Ecol Resour; 2013 Mar; 13(2):243-53. PubMed ID: 23280157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A new version of PRT software for sibling groups reconstruction with comments regarding several issues in the sibling reconstruction problem.
Almudevar A; Anderson EC
Mol Ecol Resour; 2012 Jan; 12(1):164-78. PubMed ID: 21883980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. speed-ne: Software to simulate and estimate genetic effective population size (N
Hamilton MB; Tartakovsky M; Battocletti A
Mol Ecol Resour; 2018 May; 18(3):714-728. PubMed ID: 29397009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of single-sample estimators of effective population sizes from genetic marker data.
Wang J
Mol Ecol; 2016 Oct; 25(19):4692-711. PubMed ID: 27288989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relative Precision of the Sibship and LD Methods for Estimating Effective Population Size With Genomics-Scale Datasets.
Waples RS
J Hered; 2021 Nov; 112(6):535-539. PubMed ID: 34283240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Making sense of genetic estimates of effective population size.
Waples RS
Mol Ecol; 2016 Oct; 25(19):4689-91. PubMed ID: 27671356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. On the number of siblings and p-th cousins in a large population sample.
Shchur V; Nielsen R
J Math Biol; 2018 Nov; 77(5):1279-1298. PubMed ID: 29876645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Relationship type affects the reliability of dispersal distance estimated using pedigree inferences in partially sampled populations: A case study involving invasive American mink in Scotland.
Melero Y; Oliver MK; Lambin X
Mol Ecol; 2017 Aug; 26(15):4059-4071. PubMed ID: 28437587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An Unbiased Estimator of Gene Diversity with Improved Variance for Samples Containing Related and Inbred Individuals of any Ploidy.
Harris AM; DeGiorgio M
G3 (Bethesda); 2017 Feb; 7(2):671-691. PubMed ID: 28040781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relationship uncertainty linkage statistics (RULS): affected relative pair statistics that model relationship uncertainty.
Ray A; Weeks DE
Genet Epidemiol; 2008 May; 32(4):313-24. PubMed ID: 18205206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reconstructing sibling relationships in wild populations.
Berger-Wolf TY; Sheikh SI; DasGupta B; Ashley MV; Caballero IC; Chaovalitwongse W; Putrevu SL
Bioinformatics; 2007 Jul; 23(13):i49-56. PubMed ID: 17646334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Estimating pairwise relatedness from dominant genetic markers.
Wang J
Mol Ecol; 2004 Oct; 13(10):3169-78. PubMed ID: 15367129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A new framework to test parent-child and full sibling relationships with population substructure.
Kooakachai M; LaBerge G; Santorico SA
Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Dec; 305():110012. PubMed ID: 31759292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
