These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28099771)

  • 21. Modelling evolutionary processes in small populations: not as ideal as you think.
    Waples RS; Faulkner JR
    Mol Ecol; 2009 May; 18(9):1834-47. PubMed ID: 19344355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Estimation of pairwise relatedness between individuals and characterization of isolation-by-distance processes using dominant genetic markers.
    Hardy OJ
    Mol Ecol; 2003 Jun; 12(6):1577-88. PubMed ID: 12755885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A graph-theoretic approach to the partition of individuals into full-sib families.
    Beyer J; May B
    Mol Ecol; 2003 Aug; 12(8):2243-50. PubMed ID: 12859642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Covariance Between Genotypic Effects and its Use for Genomic Inference in Half-Sib Families.
    Wittenburg D; Teuscher F; Klosa J; Reinsch N
    G3 (Bethesda); 2016 Sep; 6(9):2761-72. PubMed ID: 27402363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effect of linkage disequilibrium on linkage analysis of incomplete pedigrees.
    Levinson DF; Holmans P
    BMC Genet; 2005 Dec; 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S6. PubMed ID: 16451672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Estimating Allele Frequencies.
    Adrianto I; Montgomery C
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1666():61-81. PubMed ID: 28980242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A method for identifying genes related to a quantitative trait, incorporating multiple siblings and missing parents.
    Kistner EO; Weinberg CR
    Genet Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 29(2):155-65. PubMed ID: 16025442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Contributions of linkage disequilibrium and co-segregation information to the accuracy of genomic prediction.
    Sun X; Fernando R; Dekkers J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Oct; 48(1):77. PubMed ID: 27729012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Interpretation of simultaneous linkage and family-based association tests in genome screens.
    Chung RH; Hauser ER; Martin ER
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Feb; 31(2):134-42. PubMed ID: 17123303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Metafounders are related to F
    Garcia-Baccino CA; Legarra A; Christensen OF; Misztal I; Pocrnic I; Vitezica ZG; Cantet RJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Mar; 49(1):34. PubMed ID: 28283016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Accuracy of Genomic Prediction in Synthetic Populations Depending on the Number of Parents, Relatedness, and Ancestral Linkage Disequilibrium.
    Schopp P; Müller D; Technow F; Melchinger AE
    Genetics; 2017 Jan; 205(1):441-454. PubMed ID: 28049710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A maximum-likelihood method for the estimation of pairwise relatedness in structured populations.
    Anderson AD; Weir BS
    Genetics; 2007 May; 176(1):421-40. PubMed ID: 17339212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Partial genotyping at polymorphic markers can improve heritability estimates in sibling groups.
    Gauzere J; Oddou-Muratorio S; Gay L; Klein EK
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2016 Nov; 16(6):1340-1352. PubMed ID: 27251122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. HAPLORE: a program for haplotype reconstruction in general pedigrees without recombination.
    Zhang K; Sun F; Zhao H
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jan; 21(1):90-103. PubMed ID: 15231536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Pedigrees or markers: Which are better in estimating relatedness and inbreeding coefficient?
    Wang J
    Theor Popul Biol; 2016 Feb; 107():4-13. PubMed ID: 26344786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Pedigree reconstruction in wild cichlid fish populations.
    Koch M; Hadfield JD; Sefc KM; Sturmbauer C
    Mol Ecol; 2008 Oct; 17(20):4500-11. PubMed ID: 18986496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparison of several methods for haplotype frequency estimation and haplotype reconstruction for tightly linked markers from general pedigrees.
    Zhang K; Zhao H
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Jul; 30(5):423-37. PubMed ID: 16685719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Accuracy of genomic selection for a sib-evaluated trait using identity-by-state and identity-by-descent relationships.
    Vela-Avitúa S; Meuwissen TH; Luan T; Ødegård J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):9. PubMed ID: 25888184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Inbreeding coefficient estimation with dense SNP data: comparison of strategies and application to HapMap III.
    Gazal S; Sahbatou M; Perdry H; Letort S; Génin E; Leutenegger AL
    Hum Hered; 2014; 77(1-4):49-62. PubMed ID: 25060269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Estimation of the rate and effects of deleterious genomic mutations in finite populations with linkage disequilibrium.
    Li J; Deng HW
    Heredity (Edinb); 2005 Jul; 95(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 15931248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.