These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28101639)
1. Laparoscopic hysteropexy: 10Â years' experience. Jefferis H; Price N; Jackson S Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Aug; 28(8):1241-1248. PubMed ID: 28101639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laparoscopic hysteropexy: the initial results of a uterine suspension procedure for uterovaginal prolapse. Price N; Slack A; Jackson SR BJOG; 2010 Jan; 117(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 20002370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Vaginal and laparoscopic mesh hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse: a parallel cohort study. Gutman RE; Rardin CR; Sokol ER; Matthews C; Park AJ; Iglesia CB; Geoffrion R; Sokol AI; Karram M; Cundiff GW; Blomquist JL; Barber MD Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):38.e1-38.e11. PubMed ID: 27596620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Success rates and outcomes of laparoscopic mesh sacrohysteropexy. Daniels S; Robson D; Palacz M; Howell S; Nguyen T; Behnia-Willison F Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Apr; 60(2):244-249. PubMed ID: 31840811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial. Detollenaere RJ; den Boon J; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Vierhout ME; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW BMJ; 2015 Jul; 351():h3717. PubMed ID: 26206451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Impact of Sacrospinous Hysteropexy and Vaginal Hysterectomy With Suspension of the Uterosacral Ligaments on Sexual Function in Women With Uterine Prolapse: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Comparative Study. Detollenaere RJ; Kreuwel IA; Dijkstra JR; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW J Sex Med; 2016 Feb; 13(2):213-9. PubMed ID: 26805940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laparoscopic hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy for the treatment of uterovaginal prolapse: a prospective randomized pilot study. Rahmanou P; Price N; Jackson SR Int Urogynecol J; 2015 Nov; 26(11):1687-94. PubMed ID: 26142347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does the uterus need to be removed to correct uterovaginal prolapse? Gutman RE Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 28(5):435-40. PubMed ID: 27467823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: a multicenter randomized controlled non-inferiority trial comparing laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy with vaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy (LAVA-trial, study protocol). van IJsselmuiden MN; Coolen AL; Detollenaere RJ; den Boon J; Bongers M; van de Pol G; Vollebregt A; Radder CM; Deprest J; van Eijndhoven HW BMC Womens Health; 2014 Sep; 14():112. PubMed ID: 25231240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laparoscopic and robot-assisted suture versus mesh hysteropexy: a retrospective comparison. Gopinath D; Yong C; Harding-Forrester S; McIntyre F; McKenzie D; Carey M Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jan; 34(1):105-113. PubMed ID: 35881174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]