These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28101639)
21. [Laparoscopic suture uterosacral ligament hysteropexy for uterine prolapse]. Liang ZQ; Xu HC; Chen Y; Xiong GW; Chang Q; Zhang QY; He W Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Oct; 39(10):666-8. PubMed ID: 16144562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A Meshless Practical Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy Modification and Long-term Outcomes. Orhan A; Ozerkan K; Kasapoglu I; Ocakoglu G; Aslan K; Uncu G J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(7):1573-1580. PubMed ID: 32135244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Uterine sparing robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy for pelvic organ prolapse: safety and feasibility. Lee T; Rosenblum N; Nitti V; Brucker BM J Endourol; 2013 Sep; 27(9):1131-6. PubMed ID: 23713544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse. Pan K; Cao L; Ryan NA; Wang Y; Xu H Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Jan; 27(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 26179552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Hysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus sacrospinous hysteropexy-a multicentre randomised controlled trial (LAVA trial). van IJsselmuiden MN; van Oudheusden A; Veen J; van de Pol G; Vollebregt A; Radder CM; Housmans S; van Kuijk S; Deprest J; Bongers MY; van Eijndhoven H BJOG; 2020 Sep; 127(10):1284-1293. PubMed ID: 32267624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Uterine preservation for advanced pelvic organ prolapse repair: Anatomical results and patient satisfaction. Fink K; Shachar IB; Braun NM Int Braz J Urol; 2016; 42(4):773-8. PubMed ID: 27564289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Comparison outcomes of three surgical procedures in treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse and analysis of risk factors for genital prolapse recurrence]. Hu CD; Chen YS; Yi XF; Ding JX; Feng WW; Yao LQ; Huang J; Zhang Y; Hu WG; Zhu ZL; Hua KQ Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 46(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 21426765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A Retrospective Cohort Study of vNOTES Extraperitoneal Versus Laparoscopic Sacral Hysteropexy With Uterine Preserving Regarding Surgical Outcomes and Two-Year Follow-Up Results. Dou Y; Deng L; Liang X; Cao F; Chen B; Tang S; Wang Y J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2024 Jul; 31(7):584-591. PubMed ID: 38642887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [A randomized comparison of two vaginal procedures for the treatment of uterine prolapse using polypropylene mesh: hysteropexy versus hysterectomy]. Carramão S; Auge AP; Pacetta AM; Duarte E; Ayrosa P; Lemos NL; Aoki T Rev Col Bras Cir; 2009 Feb; 36(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 20076870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Uterus-preserving laparoscopic lateral suspension with mesh for pelvic organ prolapse: a patient-centred outcome report and video of a continuous series of 245 patients. Veit-Rubin N; Dubuisson JB; Lange S; Eperon I; Dubuisson J Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Mar; 27(3):491-3. PubMed ID: 26476819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Complications and objective outcomes of uterine preserving surgeries for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse versus procedures removing the Uterus, a systematic review. Azadi A; Marchand G; Masoud AT; Sainz K; Govindan M; Ware K; King A; Ruther S; Brazil G; Calteux N; Ulibarri H; Parise J; Arroyo A; Coriell C; Goetz S; Ostergard DR Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Dec; 267():90-98. PubMed ID: 34736035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Development and validation of the Value of Uterus instrument and visual analog scale to measure patients' valuation of their uterus. Chang OH; Walters MD; Yao M; Lapin B Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Nov; 227(5):746.e1-746.e9. PubMed ID: 35764134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. One-year outcomes of a suture-less laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy using polypropylene Y-mesh grafts and fibrin sealant spray: A prospective comparative study. Tsai CP; Kao HF; Liu CK; Shen PS; Chen MJ; Hung MJ J Chin Med Assoc; 2020 May; 83(5):484-490. PubMed ID: 31904661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Uterine-preserving POP surgery. Gutman R; Maher C Int Urogynecol J; 2013 Nov; 24(11):1803-13. PubMed ID: 24142056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Laparoscopic sacral uteropexy with cravat technique--experience and results. Api M; Kayatas S; Boza A; Nazik H; Aytan H Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(4):526-32. PubMed ID: 25251957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Combined sacrospinous hysteropexy and cystopexy using a single anterior incision. Petruzzelli P; Chiadò Fiorio Tin M; Cosma S; Parisi S; Garofalo A; Todros T Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Oct; 135(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 27352736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]