These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28101927)

  • 1. Comparing positive and negative reinforcement: A fantasy experiment.
    Nevin JA; Mandell C
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Jan; 107(1):34-38. PubMed ID: 28101927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Are positive and negative reinforcement "different"? Insights from a free-operant differential outcomes effect.
    Magoon MA; Critchfield TS; Merrill D; Newland MC; Schneider WJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Jan; 107(1):39-64. PubMed ID: 28101928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of initial-link duration on preference and resistance to change in concurrent-chains schedules.
    Jimenez-Gomez C; Podlesnik CA; Shahan TA
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):223-6. PubMed ID: 19429215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Operant conditioning methodology in the assessment of food preferences: introductory comments.
    Rashotte ME; Smith JC
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 1984; 8(2):211-5. PubMed ID: 6462550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Within-subject testing of the signaled-reinforcement effect on operant responding as measured by response rate and resistance to change.
    Reed P; Doughty AH
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 Jan; 83(1):31-45. PubMed ID: 15762379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reducing pawing in horses using positive reinforcement.
    Fox AE; Belding DL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2015 Dec; 48(4):936-40. PubMed ID: 26282112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The misbehavior of value and the discipline of the will.
    Dayan P; Niv Y; Seymour B; Daw ND
    Neural Netw; 2006 Oct; 19(8):1153-60. PubMed ID: 16938432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Discriminative and reinforcing stimulus properties of music for rats.
    Otsuka Y; Yanagi J; Watanabe S
    Behav Processes; 2009 Feb; 80(2):121-7. PubMed ID: 19022358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A simple technique for delivering liquids directly to the mouth of an unrestrained rat.
    Gross DM; Trapold MA; Hyde TS
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1968 Mar; 11(2):191-5. PubMed ID: 5645878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Application of operant conditioning techniques to forensic toxicology: experimental studies on alcohol and abusable drugs].
    Hishida S
    Nihon Hoigaku Zasshi; 1996 Oct; 50(5):292-319. PubMed ID: 8952330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Non-contingent positive and negative reinforcement schedules of superstitious behaviors.
    Bloom CM; Venard J; Harden M; Seetharaman S
    Behav Processes; 2007 May; 75(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 17353100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pavlovian conditioning and cumulative reinforcement rate.
    Harris JA; Patterson AE; Gharaei S
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2015 Apr; 41(2):137-51. PubMed ID: 25734756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Companion's effects upon resistance to change.
    dos Santos CV; Abreu-Rodrigues J
    Behav Processes; 2008 Oct; 79(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 18632224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of progressive fixed-ratio procedures in the assessment of intracranial reinforcement.
    Keesey RE; Goldstein MD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1968 May; 11(3):293-301. PubMed ID: 5660710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. "Freeloading" in a runway as a function of amount of training and type of reinforcement schedule.
    Leung CM; Jensen GD; Tapley RP
    Psychol Rep; 1968 Feb; 22(1):211-4. PubMed ID: 5641215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Renewal, resurgence, and alternative reinforcement context.
    Sweeney MM; Shahan TA
    Behav Processes; 2015 Jul; 116():43-9. PubMed ID: 25936876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sensitivity to delay is affected by magnitude of reinforcement in rats.
    Orduña V; Valencia-Torres L; Cruz G; Bouzas A
    Behav Processes; 2013 Sep; 98():18-24. PubMed ID: 23624099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Experience with dynamic reinforcement rates decreases resistance to extinction.
    Craig AR; Shahan TA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2016 Mar; 105(2):291-306. PubMed ID: 26813330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reduction of biting and chewing of horses using differential reinforcement of other behavior.
    Fox AE; Bailey SR; Hall EG; St Peter CC
    Behav Processes; 2012 Sep; 91(1):125-8. PubMed ID: 22617186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modification of reinforcement aftereffects and level of training.
    Spivey JE; Hess DT; Aponte JF
    Psychol Rep; 1968 Feb; 22(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 5641242
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.