These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28102453)

  • 21. Accuracy of computed tomographic angiography for stenosis quantification using quantitative coronary angiography or intravascular ultrasound as the gold standard.
    Joshi SB; Okabe T; Roswell RO; Weissman G; Lopez CF; Lindsay J; Pichard AD; Weissman NJ; Waksman R; Weigold WG
    Am J Cardiol; 2009 Oct; 104(8):1047-51. PubMed ID: 19801022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Intravascular ultrasound is a critical tool for accurate endograft sizing in the management of blunt thoracic aortic injury.
    Wallace GA; Starnes BW; Hatsukami TS; Sobel M; Singh N; Tran NT
    J Vasc Surg; 2015 Mar; 61(3):630-5. PubMed ID: 25499713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Magnetic resonance angiography or digital subtraction catheter angiography for follow-up of coiled aneurysms: do we need both?
    Lane A; Vivian P; Coulthard A
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2015 Apr; 59(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 25857748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Intravascular ultrasound for support in percutaneous interventional treatment].
    Neuerburg J; Vorwerk D; Günther RW; Keulers P
    Vasa Suppl; 1991; 33():298-9. PubMed ID: 1788725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A novel three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography system: In-vivo comparison with intravascular ultrasound for assessing arterial segment length.
    Tu S; Huang Z; Koning G; Cui K; Reiber JH
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Aug; 76(2):291-8. PubMed ID: 20665880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Intravascular Ultrasound in Carotid Web.
    Hassani S; Nogueira RG; Al-Bayati AR; Sachdeva R; McDaniel M; Haussen DC
    J Neurointerv Surg; 2020 May; 12(5):531-534. PubMed ID: 31801849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Prospective evaluation of optical coherence tomography in lower limb arteries compared with intravascular ultrasound.
    Eberhardt KM; Treitl M; Boesenecker K; Maxien D; Reiser M; Rieger J
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2013 Oct; 24(10):1499-508. PubMed ID: 23962439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of intravascular ultrasound with conventional venography for detection of extracranial venous abnormalities indicative of chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency.
    Karmon Y; Zivadinov R; Weinstock-Guttman B; Marr K; Valnarov V; Dolic K; Kennedy CL; Hojnacki D; Carl EM; Hagemeier J; Hopkins LN; Levy EI; Siddiqui AH
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2013 Oct; 24(10):1487-98.e1. PubMed ID: 23953830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Coronary vessel and luminal area measurement using dual-source computed tomography in comparison with intravascular ultrasound: effect of window settings on measurement accuracy.
    Marwan M; Pflederer T; Schepis T; Seltmann M; Ropers D; Daniel WG; Achenbach S
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011; 35(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 21245696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Continuous extracorporeal femoral perfusion model for intravascular ultrasound, computed tomography and digital subtraction angiography.
    Gruschwitz P; Hartung V; Kleefeldt F; Peter D; Lichthardt S; Huflage H; Grunz JP; Augustin AM; Ergün S; Bley TA; Petritsch B
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(5):e0285810. PubMed ID: 37220113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Validation of intravascular ultrasound for measurement of aortic diameters: Comparison with multi-detector computed tomography.
    Jánosi RA; Gorla R; Rogmann K; Kahlert P; Tsagakis K; Dohle DS; Wendt D; Jakob H; Schlosser T; Bossone E; Erbel R
    Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2015; 24(5):289-95. PubMed ID: 26066479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Restenosis of peripheral stents and stent grafts as revealed by intravascular sonography: in vivo comparison with angiography.
    Schwarzenberg H; Müller-Hülsbeck S; Glüer CC; Wesner F; Heller M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 May; 170(5):1181-5. PubMed ID: 9574580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Use of intravascular ultrasound as a "Quality Control" technique during carotid stent-angioplasty: are there risks to its use?
    Bandyk DF; Armstrong PA
    J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2009 Dec; 50(6):727-33. PubMed ID: 19935603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Endovascular thoracic aortic aneurysm repair: evaluating the utility of intravascular ultrasound measurements.
    Fernandez JD; Donovan S; Garrett HE; Burgar S
    J Endovasc Ther; 2008 Feb; 15(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 18254665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Initial experience with imaging of the lower extremity arteries in an open 1.0 Tesla MRI system using the triggered angiography non-contrast-enhanced sequence (TRANCE) compared to digital subtraction angiography (DSA).
    Suttmeyer B; Teichgräber U; Rathke H; Albrecht L; Güttler F; Schnackenburg B; Hamm B; de Bucourt M
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2016 Aug; 61(4):383-92. PubMed ID: 26684345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Flat panel catheter angiotomography of the spinal venous system: an enhanced venous phase for spinal digital subtraction angiography.
    Chen J; Ethiati T; Gailloud P
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2012 Nov; 33(10):1875-81. PubMed ID: 22723065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of standard- and low-tube voltage 320-detector row volume CT angiography in detection of intracranial aneurysms with digital subtraction angiography as gold standard.
    Sun G; Ding J; Lu Y; Li M; Li L; Li GY; Zhang XP
    Acad Radiol; 2012 Mar; 19(3):281-8. PubMed ID: 22206609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Stenosis detection with MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography in dysfunctional hemodialysis access fistulas and grafts.
    Froger CL; Duijm LE; Liem YS; Tielbeek AV; Donkers-van Rossum AB; Douwes-Draaijer P; Cuypers PW; Buth J; van den Bosch HC
    Radiology; 2005 Jan; 234(1):284-91. PubMed ID: 15618386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Digital subtraction angiography versus real-time fluoroscopy for detection of intravascular penetration prior to epidural steroid injections: meta-analysis of prospective studies.
    Visnjevac O; Kim P; Farid-Davari S; Johnson P; Nader ND
    Pain Physician; 2015; 18(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 25675057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Stent boost subtract imaging for the assessment of optimal stent deployment in coronary ostial lesion intervention: comparison with intravascular ultrasound.
    Zhang J; Duan Y; Jin Z; Wei Y; Yang S; Luo J; Ma D; Jing L; Liu H
    Int Heart J; 2015; 56(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 25742941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.