These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
506 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28102875)
1. Prevalence of abnormal electrocardiograms in Swiss elite athletes detected with modern screening criteria. Perrin T; Trachsel LD; Schneiter S; Menafoglio A; Albrecht S; Pirrello T; Eser P; Roten L; Gojanovic B; Wilhelm M Swiss Med Wkly; 2016; 146():w14376. PubMed ID: 28102875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Seattle Criteria increase the specificity of preparticipation ECG screening among elite athletes. Brosnan M; La Gerche A; Kalman J; Lo W; Fallon K; MacIsaac A; Prior D Br J Sports Med; 2014 Aug; 48(15):1144-50. PubMed ID: 23813487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Addition of the electrocardiogram to the preparticipation examination of college athletes. Le VV; Wheeler MT; Mandic S; Dewey F; Fonda H; Perez M; Sungar G; Garza D; Ashley EA; Matheson G; Froelicher V Clin J Sport Med; 2010 Mar; 20(2):98-105. PubMed ID: 20215891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Are the QRS duration and ST depression cut-points from the Seattle criteria too conservative? Dunn T; Abdelfattah R; Aggarwal S; Pickham D; Hadley D; Froelicher V J Electrocardiol; 2015; 48(3):395-8. PubMed ID: 25796099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of three ECG criteria for athlete pre-participation screening. Pickham D; Zarafshar S; Sani D; Kumar N; Froelicher V J Electrocardiol; 2014; 47(6):769-74. PubMed ID: 25155389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Electrocardiographic abnormalities in elite high school athletes: comparison to adolescent hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Thompson AJ; Cannon BC; Wackel PL; Horner JM; Ackerman MJ; O'Leary PW; Eidem BW; Johnson JN Br J Sports Med; 2016 Jan; 50(2):105-10. PubMed ID: 26729893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Abnormal electrocardiographic findings in athletes: Correlation with intensity of sport and level of competition. Dores H; Malhotra A; Sheikh N; Millar L; Dhutia H; Narain R; Merghani A; Papadakis M; Sharma S Rev Port Cardiol; 2016 Nov; 35(11):593-600. PubMed ID: 27693111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Electrocardiogram interpretation in NCAA athletes: Comparison of the 'Seattle' and 'International' criteria. Hyde N; Prutkin JM; Drezner JA J Electrocardiol; 2019; 56():81-84. PubMed ID: 31326858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Variability in interpretation of the electrocardiogram in young athletes: an unrecognized obstacle for electrocardiogram-based screening protocols. Berte B; Duytschaever M; Elices J; Kataria V; Timmers L; Van Heuverswyn F; Stroobandt R; De Neve J; Watteyne K; Vandensteen E; Vandekerckhove Y; Tavernier R Europace; 2015 Sep; 17(9):1435-40. PubMed ID: 25662983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost Implications of Using Different ECG Criteria for Screening Young Athletes in the United Kingdom. Dhutia H; Malhotra A; Gabus V; Merghani A; Finocchiaro G; Millar L; Narain R; Papadakis M; Naci H; Tome M; Sharma S J Am Coll Cardiol; 2016 Aug; 68(7):702-11. PubMed ID: 27515329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Costs and yield of a 15-month preparticipation cardiovascular examination with ECG in 1070 young athletes in Switzerland: implications for routine ECG screening. Menafoglio A; Di Valentino M; Segatto JM; Siragusa P; Pezzoli R; Maggi M; Romano GA; Moschovitis G; Wilhelm M; Gallino A Br J Sports Med; 2014 Aug; 48(15):1157-61. PubMed ID: 24505042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical outcomes of 10 years of cardiac screening in elite New Zealand athletes. Orchard JJ; Orchard JW; Davis AJ; Puranik R; Isbister JC; La Gerche A; Driscoll T; Doughty RN; Hamilton B J Sci Med Sport; 2023 Dec; 26(12):659-666. PubMed ID: 37932202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The differences in electrocardiogram interpretation in top-level athletes. Jakubiak AA; Burkhard-Jagodzińska K; Król W; Konopka M; Bursa D; Sitkowski D; Kuch M; Braksator W Kardiol Pol; 2017; 75(6):535-544. PubMed ID: 28181210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prevalence of abnormal ECGs in male soccer players decreases with the Seattle criteria, but is still high. Berge HM; Gjesdal K; Andersen TE; Solberg EE; Steine K Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2015 Aug; 25(4):501-8. PubMed ID: 24961617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [The athletes' ECG and the exercise related sudden cardiac death]. Trachsel LD; Wilhelm M Ther Umsch; 2015 May; 72(5):303-9. PubMed ID: 26098068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of the dynamic and static component of the sport practised for electrocardiogram analysis in screening athletes. Maillot N; Guenancia C; Yameogo NV; Gudjoncik A; Garnier F; Lorgis L; Chagué F; Cottin Y Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2018 Feb; 28(2):575-584. PubMed ID: 28730749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Normal computerized Q wave measurements in healthy young athletes. Saini D; Grober AF; Hadley D; Froelicher V J Electrocardiol; 2017; 50(3):316-322. PubMed ID: 28159337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Electrocardiography-inclusive screening strategies for detection of cardiovascular abnormalities in high school athletes. Price DE; McWilliams A; Asif IM; Martin A; Elliott SD; Dulin M; Drezner JA Heart Rhythm; 2014 Mar; 11(3):442-9. PubMed ID: 24315964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative evaluation of an electrocardiogram workflow model for athletic cardiovascular screening: Primary care network versus sports cardiology interpretation. Williamson MD; Grubic N; Moulson N; Johri AM J Electrocardiol; 2023; 81():36-40. PubMed ID: 37517199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]