These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28104901)

  • 1. Reliability of a viva assessment of clinical reasoning in an Australian pre-professional osteopathy program assessed using generalizability theory.
    Vaughan B; Orrock P; Grace S
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2017; 14():1. PubMed ID: 28104901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Developing a viva exam to assess clinical reasoning in pre-registration osteopathy students.
    Orrock P; Grace S; Vaughan B; Coutts R
    BMC Med Educ; 2014 Sep; 14():193. PubMed ID: 25238784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Mokken scale analysis of the peer physical examination questionnaire.
    Vaughan B; Grace S
    Chiropr Man Therap; 2018; 26():6. PubMed ID: 29507714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing musculoskeletal examination skills and diagnostic reasoning of 4th year medical students using a novel objective structured clinical exam.
    Stansfield RB; Diponio L; Craig C; Zeller J; Chadd E; Miller J; Monrad S
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Oct; 16(1):268. PubMed ID: 27741946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing the application of knowledge in clinical problem-solving: The structured professional reasoning exercise.
    Escudier MP; Woolford MJ; Tricio JA
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2018 May; 22(2):e269-e277. PubMed ID: 28804939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exploring the measurement properties of the osteopathy clinical teaching questionnaire using Rasch analysis.
    Vaughan B
    Chiropr Man Therap; 2018; 26():13. PubMed ID: 29744031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Novel examination for evaluating medical student clinical reasoning: reliability and association with patients seen.
    Hemmer PA; Dong T; Durning SJ; Pangaro LN
    Mil Med; 2015 Apr; 180(4 Suppl):79-87. PubMed ID: 25850132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability analysis of the objective structured clinical examination using generalizability theory.
    Trejo-Mejía JA; Sánchez-Mendiola M; Méndez-Ramírez I; Martínez-González A
    Med Educ Online; 2016; 21():31650. PubMed ID: 27543188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability and validity of an extended clinical examination.
    Bouwmans GA; Denessen E; Hettinga AM; Michels C; Postma CT
    Med Teach; 2015; 37(12):1072-7. PubMed ID: 25683172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Investigation of standardized patient ratings of humanistic competence on a medical licensure examination using Many-Facet Rasch Measurement and generalizability theory.
    Zhang X; Roberts WL
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2013 Dec; 18(5):929-44. PubMed ID: 23224249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing medical student competency in communication in the pre-clinical phase: objective structured video exam and SP exam.
    Karabilgin OS; Vatansever K; Caliskan SA; Durak Hİ
    Patient Educ Couns; 2012 Jun; 87(3):293-9. PubMed ID: 22169634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The DREEM, part 2: psychometric properties in an osteopathic student population.
    Vaughan B; Mulcahy J; McLaughlin P
    BMC Med Educ; 2014 May; 14():100. PubMed ID: 24884704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validity of a new assessment rubric for a short-answer test of clinical reasoning.
    Yeung E; Kulasagarem K; Woods N; Dubrowski A; Hodges B; Carnahan H
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Jul; 16():192. PubMed ID: 27461249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing clinical reasoning abilities of medical students using clinical performance examination.
    Im S; Kim DK; Kong HH; Roh HR; Oh YR; Seo JH
    Korean J Med Educ; 2016 Mar; 28(1):35-47. PubMed ID: 26838567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does Changing Examiner Stations During UK Postgraduate Surgery Objective Structured Clinical Examinations Influence Examination Reliability and Candidates' Scores?
    Brennan PA; Croke DT; Reed M; Smith L; Munro E; Foulkes J; Arnett R
    J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(4):616-23. PubMed ID: 26923102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The reliability of the College of Intensive Care Medicine of Australia and New Zealand "Hot Case" examination.
    Hoffman KR; Swanson D; Lane S; Nickson C; Brand P; Ryan AT
    BMC Med Educ; 2024 May; 24(1):527. PubMed ID: 38734603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using generalizability analysis to estimate parameters for anatomy assessments: A multi-institutional study.
    Byram JN; Seifert MF; Brooks WS; Fraser-Cotlin L; Thorp LE; Williams JM; Wilson AB
    Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Mar; 10(2):109-119. PubMed ID: 27458988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The objective structured clinical examination: can physician-examiners participate from a distance?
    Chan J; Humphrey-Murto S; Pugh DM; Su C; Wood T
    Med Educ; 2014 Apr; 48(4):441-50. PubMed ID: 24606627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. LUCAS: a theoretically informed instrument to assess clinical communication in objective structured clinical examinations.
    Huntley CD; Salmon P; Fisher PL; Fletcher I; Young B
    Med Educ; 2012 Mar; 46(3):267-76. PubMed ID: 22324526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can standardized patients replace physicians as OSCE examiners?
    McLaughlin K; Gregor L; Jones A; Coderre S
    BMC Med Educ; 2006 Feb; 6():12. PubMed ID: 16504145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.