204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28105954)
1. The AMP-Foot 3, new generation propulsive prosthetic feet with explosive motion characteristics: design and validation.
Cherelle P; Grosu V; Cestari M; Vanderborght B; Lefeber D
Biomed Eng Online; 2016 Dec; 15(Suppl 3):145. PubMed ID: 28105954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A powered prosthetic ankle joint for walking and running.
Grimmer M; Holgate M; Holgate R; Boehler A; Ward J; Hollander K; Sugar T; Seyfarth A
Biomed Eng Online; 2016 Dec; 15(Suppl 3):141. PubMed ID: 28105953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Benefits of an increased prosthetic ankle range of motion for individuals with a trans-tibial amputation walking with a new prosthetic foot.
Heitzmann DWW; Salami F; De Asha AR; Block J; Putz C; Wolf SI; Alimusaj M
Gait Posture; 2018 Jul; 64():174-180. PubMed ID: 29913354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Advances in Powered Ankle-Foot Prostheses.
Chumacero E; Masud AA; Isik D; Shen CL; Chyu MC
Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 2018; 46(2):93-108. PubMed ID: 30055526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lower-limb amputee ankle and hip kinetic response to an imposed error in mediolateral foot placement.
Segal AD; Shofer JB; Klute GK
J Biomech; 2015 Nov; 48(15):3982-3988. PubMed ID: 26475221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Design and Validation of the Ankle Mimicking Prosthetic (AMP-) Foot 2.0.
Cherelle P; Grosu V; Matthys A; Vanderborght B; Lefeber D
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2014 Jan; 22(1):138-48. PubMed ID: 24122571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prosthetic feet: state-of-the-art review and the importance of mimicking human ankle-foot biomechanics.
Versluys R; Beyl P; Van Damme M; Desomer A; Van Ham R; Lefeber D
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2009 Mar; 4(2):65-75. PubMed ID: 19253096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A methodology for studying the effects of various types of prosthetic feet on the biomechanics of trans-femoral amputee gait.
van der Linden ML; Solomonidis SE; Spence WD; Li N; Paul JP
J Biomech; 1999 Sep; 32(9):877-89. PubMed ID: 10460124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Functional joint center of prosthetic feet during level ground and incline walking.
Lecomte C; Starker F; Guðnadóttir EÞ; Rafnsdóttir S; Guðmundsson K; Briem K; Brynjolfsson S
Med Eng Phys; 2020 Jul; 81():13-21. PubMed ID: 32527519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cognitive performance and brain dynamics during walking with a novel bionic foot: A pilot study.
De Pauw K; Cherelle P; Tassignon B; Van Cutsem J; Roelands B; Marulanda FG; Lefeber D; Vanderborght B; Meeusen R
PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0214711. PubMed ID: 30943265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Powered ankle-foot prosthesis to assist level-ground and stair-descent gaits.
Au S; Berniker M; Herr H
Neural Netw; 2008 May; 21(4):654-66. PubMed ID: 18499394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Standing on slopes - how current microprocessor-controlled prosthetic feet support transtibial and transfemoral amputees in an everyday task.
Ernst M; Altenburg B; Bellmann M; Schmalz T
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2017 Nov; 14(1):117. PubMed ID: 29145876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transtibial amputee gait efficiency: Energy storage and return versus solid ankle cushioned heel prosthetic feet.
Gardiner J; Bari AZ; Howard D; Kenney L
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2016; 53(6):1133-1138. PubMed ID: 28355033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of prosthetic ankle energy storage and return properties on muscle activity in below-knee amputee walking.
Ventura JD; Klute GK; Neptune RR
Gait Posture; 2011 Feb; 33(2):220-6. PubMed ID: 21145747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Feasibility study of transtibial amputee walking using a powered prosthetic foot.
Grimmer M; Holgate M; Ward J; Boehler A; Seyfarth A
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():1118-1123. PubMed ID: 28813971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prosthetic ankle push-off work reduces metabolic rate but not collision work in non-amputee walking.
Caputo JM; Collins SH
Sci Rep; 2014 Dec; 4():7213. PubMed ID: 25467389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mechanical energy profiles of the combined ankle-foot system in normal gait: insights for prosthetic designs.
Takahashi KZ; Stanhope SJ
Gait Posture; 2013 Sep; 38(4):818-23. PubMed ID: 23628408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bio-inspired design and validation of the Efficient Lockable Spring Ankle (ELSA) prosthesis.
Heremans F; Vijayakumar S; Bouri M; Dehez B; Ronsse R
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2019 Jun; 2019():411-416. PubMed ID: 31374664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparative study of conventional and energy-storing prosthetic feet in high-functioning transfemoral amputees.
Graham LE; Datta D; Heller B; Howitt J; Pros D
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Jun; 88(6):801-6. PubMed ID: 17532907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Once-per-step control of ankle-foot prosthesis push-off work reduces effort associated with balance during walking.
Kim M; Collins SH
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2015 May; 12():43. PubMed ID: 25928176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
