These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28105993)

  • 1. Percutaneous coronary intervention using a combination of robotics and telecommunications by an operator in a separate physical location from the patient: an early exploration into the feasibility of telestenting (the REMOTE-PCI study).
    Madder RD; VanOosterhout SM; Jacoby ME; Collins JS; Borgman AS; Mulder AN; Elmore MA; Campbell JL; McNamara RF; Wohns DH
    EuroIntervention; 2017 Jan; 12(13):1569-1576. PubMed ID: 28105993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Safety and feasibility of robotic percutaneous coronary intervention: PRECISE (Percutaneous Robotically-Enhanced Coronary Intervention) Study.
    Weisz G; Metzger DC; Caputo RP; Delgado JA; Marshall JJ; Vetrovec GW; Reisman M; Waksman R; Granada JF; Novack V; Moses JW; Carrozza JP
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Apr; 61(15):1596-600. PubMed ID: 23500318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. First-in-human evaluation of a novel robotic-assisted coronary angioplasty system.
    Granada JF; Delgado JA; Uribe MP; Fernandez A; Blanco G; Leon MB; Weisz G
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Apr; 4(4):460-5. PubMed ID: 21511227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Demonstration of the Safety and Feasibility of Robotically Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Complex Coronary Lesions: Results of the CORA-PCI Study (Complex Robotically Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention).
    Mahmud E; Naghi J; Ang L; Harrison J; Behnamfar O; Pourdjabbar A; Reeves R; Patel M
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Jul; 10(13):1320-1327. PubMed ID: 28683937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. First-in-human robotic percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main stenosis.
    Mahmud E; Dominguez A; Bahadorani J
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Oct; 88(4):565-570. PubMed ID: 27189238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robotically-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention: Reasons for partial manual assistance or manual conversion.
    Harrison J; Ang L; Naghi J; Behnamfar O; Pourdjabbar A; Patel MP; Reeves RR; Mahmud E
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2018 Jul; 19(5 Pt A):526-531. PubMed ID: 29221959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robotic percutaneous coronary intervention (R-PCI): Time to focus on the pros and cons.
    Thirumurugan E; Gomathi K; Swathy P; Afrin SA; Karthick R
    Indian Heart J; 2023; 75(3):161-168. PubMed ID: 37080484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robotic telestenting performance in transcontinental and regional pre-clinical models.
    Madder RD; VanOosterhout S; Parker J; Sconzert K; Li Y; Kottenstette N; Madsen A; Sungur JM; Bergman P
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Feb; 97(3):E327-E332. PubMed ID: 32583944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Network latency and long-distance robotic telestenting: Exploring the potential impact of network delays on telestenting performance.
    Madder RD; VanOosterhout S; Mulder A; Bush J; Martin S; Rash AJ; Tan JM; Parker JL; Kalafut A; Li Y; Kottenstette N; Bergman P; Nowak B
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Apr; 95(5):914-919. PubMed ID: 31410958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Complex robotic-enhanced percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Kapur V; Smilowitz NR; Weisz G
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 May; 83(6):915-21. PubMed ID: 24167108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robotic Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Initial Australian Experience.
    Leung J; French J; Xu J; Kachwalla H; Kaddapu K; Badie T; Mussap C; Rajaratnam R; Leung D; Lo S; Juergens C
    Heart Lung Circ; 2024 Apr; 33(4):493-499. PubMed ID: 38365501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the R-One robotic system for percutaneous coronary intervention: the R-EVOLUTION study.
    Durand E; Sabatier R; Smits PC; Verheye S; Pereira B; Fajadet J
    EuroIntervention; 2023 Apr; 18(16):e1339-e1347. PubMed ID: 36602883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robotics in percutaneous cardiovascular interventions.
    Pourdjabbar A; Ang L; Behnamfar O; Patel MP; Reeves RR; Campbell PT; Madder RD; Mahmud E
    Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2017 Nov; 15(11):825-833. PubMed ID: 28914558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Latest Developments in Robotic Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Hofmann FJ; Dörr O; Blachutzik F; Boeder N; Elsässer A; Keranov S; Köhne A; Hofmann S; Möllmann H; Hamm C; Nef HM
    Surg Technol Int; 2021 May; 38():325-330. PubMed ID: 34081770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Safety and Feasibility of a Novel, Second-Generation Robotic-Assisted System for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: First-in-Human Report.
    Smitson CC; Ang L; Pourdjabbar A; Reeves R; Patel M; Mahmud E
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2018 Apr; 30(4):152-156. PubMed ID: 29335386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Outcomes of Robotically Assisted Versus Manual Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Allencherril J; Hyman D; Loya A; Jneid H; Alam M
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2019 Aug; 31(8):199-203. PubMed ID: 31088991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hybrid coronary revascularization using robotic totally endoscopic surgery: perioperative outcomes and 5-year results.
    Bonatti JO; Zimrin D; Lehr EJ; Vesely M; Kon ZN; Wehman B; de Biasi AR; Hofauer B; Weidinger F; Schachner T; Bonaros N; Friedrich G
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2012 Dec; 94(6):1920-6; discussion 1926. PubMed ID: 23103003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multiple arterial grafting confers survival advantage compared to percutaneous intervention with drug-eluting stents in multivessel coronary artery disease: A propensity score adjusted analysis.
    Raja SG; Benedetto U; Ilsley CD; Amrani M;
    Int J Cardiol; 2015; 189():153-8. PubMed ID: 25897895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robotic technology in interventional cardiology: Current status and future perspectives.
    Mahmud E; Pourdjabbar A; Ang L; Behnamfar O; Patel MP; Reeves RR
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Nov; 90(6):956-962. PubMed ID: 28795481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention--filling an unmet need.
    Carrozza JP
    J Cardiovasc Transl Res; 2012 Feb; 5(1):62-6. PubMed ID: 22068433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.