These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28106651)

  • 21. Uterine Conservation During Prolapse Repair: 9-Year Experience at a Single Institution.
    Kow N; Goldman HB; Ridgeway B
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(3):126-31. PubMed ID: 26516818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications.
    Swenson CW; Kamdar NS; Harris JA; Uppal S; Campbell DA; Morgan DM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):650.e1-650.e8. PubMed ID: 27343568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Impact of Case Order on Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy: Do Surgeons Need a Warm-Up?
    Lavelle ES; Turner LC; Shepherd JP
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2017; 23(4):272-275. PubMed ID: 28106657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Surgical excision of eroded mesh after prior abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
    South MM; Foster RT; Webster GD; Weidner AC; Amundsen CL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Dec; 197(6):615.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18060951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Influence of body mass index on the outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a comparative retrospective study].
    Menzella D; Thubert T; Joubert M; Lauratet B; Kouchner P; Lefranc JP
    Prog Urol; 2013 Dec; 23(17):1482-8. PubMed ID: 24286549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Intraoperative Handoffs and Postoperative Complications Among Patients Undergoing Gynecologic Oncology Operations.
    Doll KM; Lavery JA; Snavely AC; Gehrig PA
    J Healthc Qual; 2017; 39(4):e42-e48. PubMed ID: 27348430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of surgical start time in patients undergoing minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy.
    Jallad K; Barber MD; Ridgeway B; Paraiso MF; Unger CA
    Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Oct; 27(10):1535-9. PubMed ID: 27026142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Intraoperative Scrub Nurse Handoffs Are Associated with Increased Operative Times for Lower Extremity Orthopaedic Sports Procedures.
    Hammoor BT; Kaidi AC; Crutchfield CR; Ferrer XE; Hickernell TR; Ahmad CS; Levine WN; Lynch TS
    Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil; 2021 Aug; 3(4):e1105-e1112. PubMed ID: 34430890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Intraoperative and postoperative gastrointestinal complications associated with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.
    Warner WB; Vora S; Alonge A; Welgoss JA; Hurtado EA; von Pechmann WS
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2012; 18(6):321-4. PubMed ID: 23143422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Single Port Robotic Assisted Sacrocolpopexy: Our Experience With the First 25 Cases.
    Matanes E; Lauterbach R; Mustafa-Mikhail S; Amit A; Wiener Z; Lowenstein L
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2017; 23(3):e14-e18. PubMed ID: 28134702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Differences in recurrent prolapse at 1 year after total vs supracervical hysterectomy and robotic sacrocolpopexy.
    Myers EM; Siff L; Osmundsen B; Geller E; Matthews CA
    Int Urogynecol J; 2015 Apr; 26(4):585-9. PubMed ID: 25366305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Laparoscopic hysteropexy: 10 years' experience.
    Jefferis H; Price N; Jackson S
    Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Aug; 28(8):1241-1248. PubMed ID: 28101639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Outcomes of Robotic Sacrocolpopexy Using Only Absorbable Suture for Mesh Fixation.
    Linder BJ; Anand M; Klingele CJ; Trabuco EC; Gebhart JB; Occhino JA
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2017; 23(1):13-16. PubMed ID: 27636221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Perioperative morbidity using transvaginal mesh in pelvic organ prolapse repair.
    Altman D; Falconer C
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Feb; 109(2 Pt 1):303-8. PubMed ID: 17267828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Retrospective multicentre study of the new minimally invasive mesh repair devices for pelvic organ prolapse.
    Abdel-Fattah M; Ramsay I;
    BJOG; 2008 Jan; 115(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 18053100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Long-Term Effectiveness of Uterosacral Colpopexy and Minimally Invasive Sacral Colpopexy for Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
    Unger CA; Barber MD; Walters MD; Paraiso MFR; Ridgeway B; Jelovsek JE
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2017; 23(3):188-194. PubMed ID: 27636212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Laparoscopic pelvic floor repair using polypropylene mesh.
    Weng SS; Liu CY
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 47(3):312-7. PubMed ID: 18935995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Laparoscopic extraperitoneal uterine suspension to anterior abdominal wall bilaterally using synthetic mesh to treat uterovaginal prolapse.
    Chen G; Ling B; Li J; Xu P; Hu W; Zhao W; Wu D
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(5):631-6. PubMed ID: 20598651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Long-term results of robotic assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of high grade vaginal vault prolapse.
    Elliott DS; Krambeck AE; Chow GK
    J Urol; 2006 Aug; 176(2):655-9. PubMed ID: 16813916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Lack of association between intraoperative handoff of care and postoperative complications: a retrospective observational study.
    O'Reilly-Shah VN; Melanson VG; Sullivan CL; Jabaley CS; Lynde GC
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2019 Oct; 19(1):182. PubMed ID: 31615410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.