These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28106758)
1. Validation of a Smartphone Image-Based Dietary Assessment Method for Pregnant Women. Ashman AM; Collins CE; Brown LJ; Rae KM; Rollo ME Nutrients; 2017 Jan; 9(1):. PubMed ID: 28106758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Brief Tool to Assess Image-Based Dietary Records and Guide Nutrition Counselling Among Pregnant Women: An Evaluation. Ashman AM; Collins CE; Brown LJ; Rae KM; Rollo ME JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2016 Nov; 4(4):e123. PubMed ID: 27815234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validity and Usability of a Smartphone Image-Based Dietary Assessment App Compared to 3-Day Food Diaries in Assessing Dietary Intake Among Canadian Adults: Randomized Controlled Trial. Ji Y; Plourde H; Bouzo V; Kilgour RD; Cohen TR JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2020 Sep; 8(9):e16953. PubMed ID: 32902389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The validity of a web-based FFQ assessed by doubly labelled water and multiple 24-h recalls. Medin AC; Carlsen MH; Hambly C; Speakman JR; Strohmaier S; Andersen LF Br J Nutr; 2017 Dec; 118(12):1106-1117. PubMed ID: 29202890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of a Tablet Application for Assessing Dietary Intakes Compared with the Measured Food Intake/Food Waste Method in Military Personnel Consuming Field Rations. Ahmed M; Mandic I; Lou W; Goodman L; Jacobs I; L'Abbé MR Nutrients; 2017 Feb; 9(3):. PubMed ID: 28264428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Evaluation study on a new method of dietary assessment with instant photography applied in urban pregnant women in Nanjing city]. Jiang T; Dai Y; Miao M; Zhang Y; Song C; Wang Z Wei Sheng Yan Jiu; 2015 Jul; 44(4):586-92. PubMed ID: 26454956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development and validation of a smartphone image-based app for dietary intake assessment among Palestinian undergraduates. Hattab S; Badrasawi M; Anabtawi O; Zidan S Sci Rep; 2022 Sep; 12(1):15467. PubMed ID: 36104377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relative validation of a quantitative FFQ for use in Brazilian pregnant women. Barbieri P; Nishimura RY; Crivellenti LC; Sartorelli DS Public Health Nutr; 2013 Aug; 16(8):1419-26. PubMed ID: 22895030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of an interactive 24-h recall and weighed food record for measuring energy and nutrient intakes from complementary foods among 9-10-month-old Malawian infants consuming lipid-based nutrient supplements. Hemsworth J; Arimond M; Kumwenda C; Rehman AM; Maleta K; Ashorn U; Keogh R; Ferguson EL Br J Nutr; 2018 Dec; 120(11):1262-1271. PubMed ID: 30350761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of a self-administered web-based 24-hour dietary recall among pregnant women. Savard C; Lemieux S; Lafrenière J; Laramée C; Robitaille J; Morisset AS BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 Apr; 18(1):112. PubMed ID: 29685127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of an web-based dietary assessment tool (RiksmatenFlex) against doubly labelled water and 24 h dietary recalls in pregnant women. Söderström E; Sandborg J; Nilsson E; Henström M; Lemming EW; Lindroos AK; Rood J; Sipinen JP; Löf M Nutr J; 2024 Jul; 23(1):85. PubMed ID: 39080751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparing intake estimations based on food composition data with chemical analysis in Malian women. Koréissi-Dembélé Y; Doets EL; Fanou-Fogny N; Hulshof PJ; Moretti D; Brouwer ID Public Health Nutr; 2017 Jun; 20(8):1351-1361. PubMed ID: 28173883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relative Validity of a 24-h Recall in Assessing Intake of Key Nutrients in a Cohort of Australian Toddlers. Beaton E; Wright J; Devenish G; Do L; Scott J Nutrients; 2018 Jan; 10(1):. PubMed ID: 29329266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dietary intake in human immunodeficiency virus-infected adults: a comparison of dietary assessment methods. Hendricks K; Tang A; Spiegelman D; Skinner S; Woods M J Am Diet Assoc; 2005 Apr; 105(4):532-40. PubMed ID: 15800553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Feasibility of a commercial smartphone application for dietary assessment in epidemiological research and comparison with 24-h dietary recalls. Ambrosini GL; Hurworth M; Giglia R; Trapp G; Strauss P Nutr J; 2018 Jan; 17(1):5. PubMed ID: 29316930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of a short food frequency questionnaire in Australian adults. Khalesi S; Doshi D; Buys N; Sun J Int J Food Sci Nutr; 2017 May; 68(3):349-357. PubMed ID: 27744752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of a Novel WeChat Applet for Image-Based Dietary Assessment among Pregnant Women in China. Ding Y; Lu X; Xie Z; Jiang T; Song C; Wang Z Nutrients; 2021 Sep; 13(9):. PubMed ID: 34579035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relative validity of a food frequency questionnaire to assess nutrient intake in pregnant women. McGowan CA; Curran S; McAuliffe FM J Hum Nutr Diet; 2014 Apr; 27 Suppl 2():167-74. PubMed ID: 23627971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Relative Validity and Reliability of the Remind App as an Image-Based Method to Assess Dietary Intake and Meal Timing in Young Adults. Ramírez-Contreras C; Farran-Codina A; Zerón-Rugerio MF; Izquierdo-Pulido M Nutrients; 2023 Apr; 15(8):. PubMed ID: 37111043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Agreement in participant-coded and investigator-coded food-record analysis in overweight research participants: an examination of interpretation bias. Bjorge-Schohl B; Johnston CS; Trier CM; Fleming KR J Acad Nutr Diet; 2014 May; 114(5):796-801. PubMed ID: 24210517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]