204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28106758)
1. Validation of a Smartphone Image-Based Dietary Assessment Method for Pregnant Women.
Ashman AM; Collins CE; Brown LJ; Rae KM; Rollo ME
Nutrients; 2017 Jan; 9(1):. PubMed ID: 28106758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Brief Tool to Assess Image-Based Dietary Records and Guide Nutrition Counselling Among Pregnant Women: An Evaluation.
Ashman AM; Collins CE; Brown LJ; Rae KM; Rollo ME
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2016 Nov; 4(4):e123. PubMed ID: 27815234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of a Tablet Application for Assessing Dietary Intakes Compared with the Measured Food Intake/Food Waste Method in Military Personnel Consuming Field Rations.
Ahmed M; Mandic I; Lou W; Goodman L; Jacobs I; L'Abbé MR
Nutrients; 2017 Feb; 9(3):. PubMed ID: 28264428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Evaluation study on a new method of dietary assessment with instant photography applied in urban pregnant women in Nanjing city].
Jiang T; Dai Y; Miao M; Zhang Y; Song C; Wang Z
Wei Sheng Yan Jiu; 2015 Jul; 44(4):586-92. PubMed ID: 26454956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relative validation of a quantitative FFQ for use in Brazilian pregnant women.
Barbieri P; Nishimura RY; Crivellenti LC; Sartorelli DS
Public Health Nutr; 2013 Aug; 16(8):1419-26. PubMed ID: 22895030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of a self-administered web-based 24-hour dietary recall among pregnant women.
Savard C; Lemieux S; Lafrenière J; Laramée C; Robitaille J; Morisset AS
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 Apr; 18(1):112. PubMed ID: 29685127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing intake estimations based on food composition data with chemical analysis in Malian women.
Koréissi-Dembélé Y; Doets EL; Fanou-Fogny N; Hulshof PJ; Moretti D; Brouwer ID
Public Health Nutr; 2017 Jun; 20(8):1351-1361. PubMed ID: 28173883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dietary intake in human immunodeficiency virus-infected adults: a comparison of dietary assessment methods.
Hendricks K; Tang A; Spiegelman D; Skinner S; Woods M
J Am Diet Assoc; 2005 Apr; 105(4):532-40. PubMed ID: 15800553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of a short food frequency questionnaire in Australian adults.
Khalesi S; Doshi D; Buys N; Sun J
Int J Food Sci Nutr; 2017 May; 68(3):349-357. PubMed ID: 27744752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relative validity of a food frequency questionnaire to assess nutrient intake in pregnant women.
McGowan CA; Curran S; McAuliffe FM
J Hum Nutr Diet; 2014 Apr; 27 Suppl 2():167-74. PubMed ID: 23627971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Agreement in participant-coded and investigator-coded food-record analysis in overweight research participants: an examination of interpretation bias.
Bjorge-Schohl B; Johnston CS; Trier CM; Fleming KR
J Acad Nutr Diet; 2014 May; 114(5):796-801. PubMed ID: 24210517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relative validity of an FFQ to estimate daily food and nutrient intakes for Chilean adults.
Dehghan M; Martinez S; Zhang X; Seron P; Lanas F; Islam S; Merchant AT
Public Health Nutr; 2013 Oct; 16(10):1782-8. PubMed ID: 22995762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of a Food Frequency Questionnaire for Estimating Micronutrient Intakes in an Urban US Sample of Multi-Ethnic Pregnant Women.
Brunst KJ; Kannan S; Ni YM; Gennings C; Ganguri HB; Wright RJ
Matern Child Health J; 2016 Feb; 20(2):250-60. PubMed ID: 26511128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validity and reliability of a food frequency questionnaire to estimate dietary intake among Lebanese children.
Moghames P; Hammami N; Hwalla N; Yazbeck N; Shoaib H; Nasreddine L; Naja F
Nutr J; 2016 Jan; 15():4. PubMed ID: 26753989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparisons of four dietary assessment methods during pregnancy in Taiwanese women.
Lyu LC; Hsu YN; Chen HF; Lo CC; Lin CL
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jun; 53(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 25017260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of diet quality in pregnant women using the Healthy Eating Index.
Pick ME; Edwards M; Moreau D; Ryan EA
J Am Diet Assoc; 2005 Feb; 105(2):240-6. PubMed ID: 15668682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Novel dietary intake assessment in populations with poor literacy.
Subasinghe AK; Thrift AG; Evans RG; Arabshahi S; Suresh O; Kartik K; Kalyanram K; Walker KZ
Asia Pac J Clin Nutr; 2016; 25(1):202-12. PubMed ID: 26965780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validity and practicability of smartphone-based photographic food records for estimating energy and nutrient intake.
Kong K; Zhang L; Huang L; Tao Y
Asia Pac J Clin Nutr; 2017 May; 26(3):396-401. PubMed ID: 28429902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of web-based, self-administered, graphical food frequency questionnaire.
Kristal AR; Kolar AS; Fisher JL; Plascak JJ; Stumbo PJ; Weiss R; Paskett ED
J Acad Nutr Diet; 2014 Apr; 114(4):613-21. PubMed ID: 24462267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of academic examinations on energy and nutrient intake in male university students.
Barker ME; Blain RJ; Russell JM
Nutr J; 2015 Sep; 14():98. PubMed ID: 26408322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
