These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28106888)

  • 1. SPARCS and Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity testing in normal controls and patients with cataract.
    Gupta L; Cvintal V; Delvadia R; Sun Y; Erdem E; Zangalli C; Lu L; Wizov SS; Richman J; Spaeth E; Spaeth GL
    Eye (Lond); 2017 May; 31(5):753-761. PubMed ID: 28106888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of contrast sensitivity by Spaeth Richman Contrast Sensitivity Test and Pelli Robson Chart Test in patients with varying severity of glaucoma.
    Thakur S; Ichhpujani P; Kumar S; Kaur R; Sood S
    Eye (Lond); 2018 Aug; 32(8):1392-1400. PubMed ID: 29755121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Establishment of a normative database and evaluation of the test-retest repeatability of the Spaeth/Richman contrast sensitivity test.
    Gupta L; Waisbourd M; Sanvicente CT; Hsieh M; Wizov SS; Spaeth EE; Richman J; Spaeth GL
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2019 Jan; 63(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 30415314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Spaeth/Richman contrast sensitivity test (SPARCS): design, reproducibility and ability to identify patients with glaucoma.
    Richman J; Zangalli C; Lu L; Wizov SS; Spaeth E; Spaeth GL
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2015 Jan; 99(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 25053760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The SPARCS: a novel assessment of contrast sensitivity and its reliability in patients with corrected refractive error.
    Sun Y; Erdem E; Lyu A; Zangalli C; Wizov SS; Lo D; Spaeth EE; Richman J; Spaeth GL
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2016 Oct; 100(10):1421-6. PubMed ID: 26758536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. EVALUATING CONTRAST SENSITIVITY IN AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION USING A NOVEL COMPUTER-BASED TEST, THE SPAETH/RICHMAN CONTRAST SENSITIVITY TEST.
    Faria BM; Duman F; Zheng CX; Waisbourd M; Gupta L; Ali M; Zangalli C; Lu L; Wizov SS; Spaeth E; Richman J; Spaeth GL
    Retina; 2015 Jul; 35(7):1465-73. PubMed ID: 25658175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spaeth/Richman Contrast Sensitivity in Staging Glaucoma.
    Rao A; Pal A; Mohapatra S
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2020 Dec; 9(13):39. PubMed ID: 33384893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The letter contrast sensitivity test: clinical evaluation of a new design.
    Haymes SA; Roberts KF; Cruess AF; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Ramsey MS; Chauhan BC; Artes PH
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Jun; 47(6):2739-45. PubMed ID: 16723494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing the reliability, discriminative ability, and validity of disability glare tests.
    Elliott DB; Bullimore MA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1993 Jan; 34(1):108-19. PubMed ID: 8425818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relationships Between Measures of the Ability to Perform Vision-Related Activities, Vision-Related Quality of Life, and Clinical Findings in Patients With Glaucoma.
    Ekici F; Loh R; Waisbourd M; Sun Y; Martinez P; Nayak N; Wizov SS; Hegarty S; Hark LA; Spaeth GL
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Dec; 133(12):1377-85. PubMed ID: 26425961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contrast sensitivity measurement with 2 contrast sensitivity tests in normal eyes and eyes with cataract.
    Hong YT; Kim SW; Kim EK; Kim TI
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Apr; 36(4):547-52. PubMed ID: 20362843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contrast sensitivity and glare in cataract using the Pelli-Robson chart.
    Williamson TH; Strong NP; Sparrow J; Aggarwal RK; Harrad R
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1992 Dec; 76(12):719-22. PubMed ID: 1486072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contrast sensitivity in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.
    Rehman O; Ichhpujani P; Kumar S
    Rom J Ophthalmol; 2020; 64(4):380-386. PubMed ID: 33367175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Normative database for Spaeth Richman contrast sensitivity test for Indian eyes.
    Bariya S; Ichhpujani P; Rehman O; Kumar S
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2022 Oct; 70(10):3476-3482. PubMed ID: 36190030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual risk factors for crash involvement in older drivers with cataract.
    Owsley C; Stalvey BT; Wells J; Sloane ME; McGwin G
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2001 Jun; 119(6):881-7. PubMed ID: 11405840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Central and Peripheral Contrast Sensitivity Between Healthy and Refractive Surgery Patients Using the Spaeth/Richman Contrast Sensitivity (SPARCS) Test.
    Tsiogka A; Karmiris E; Samoli E; Spaeth GL
    J Refract Surg; 2022 Feb; 38(2):128-133. PubMed ID: 35156456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contrast acuity in cataracts of different morphology and association to self-reported visual function.
    Stifter E; Sacu S; Thaler A; Weghaupt H
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Dec; 47(12):5412-22. PubMed ID: 17122131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in the elderly.
    Hirvelä H; Koskela P; Laatikainen L
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 1995 Apr; 73(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 7656135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of contrast sensitivity in patients with advanced glaucoma: comparison of two tests.
    Jammal AA; Ferreira BG; Zangalli CS; Vianna JR; Thompson AC; Artes PH; Costa VP; Reis ASC
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2020 Oct; 104(10):1418-1422. PubMed ID: 31974085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How accurate is an LCD screen version of the Pelli-Robson test?
    Zeri F; Calcatelli P; Funaro E; Martelli M; Naroo SA
    Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Aug; 38(4):1473-1484. PubMed ID: 28639086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.