198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28107240)
1. An In Vitro Evaluation of Fracture Reduction Achieved by Inflatable Bone Tamps Under Simulated Physiological Load.
Gordon M; Peppelman WC; Beutler W; OʼHalloran D; Chinthakunta SR; Bucklen B
Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Feb; 30(1):E31-E37. PubMed ID: 28107240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of an Outer Sleeve on an Inflatable Balloon Tamp in Terms of Height Restoration Under Simulated Physiological Load.
Peppelman WC; Beutler W; Gordon M; Chintakunta SR; O'Halloran D; Bucklen B
Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Apr; 30(3):E211-E218. PubMed ID: 28323702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Restoring geometric and loading alignment of the thoracic spine with a vertebral compression fracture: effects of balloon (bone tamp) inflation and spinal extension.
Gaitanis IN; Carandang G; Phillips FM; Magovern B; Ghanayem AJ; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Zindrick MR; Hadjipavlou AG; Patwardhan AG
Spine J; 2005; 5(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 15653084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An ex vivo evaluation of an inflatable bone tamp used to reduce fractures within vertebral bodies under load.
Belkoff SM; Jasper LE; Stevens SS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Aug; 27(15):1640-3. PubMed ID: 12163725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical evaluation of kyphoplasty with calcium sulfate cement in a cadaveric osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture model.
Perry A; Mahar A; Massie J; Arrieta N; Garfin S; Kim C
Spine J; 2005; 5(5):489-93. PubMed ID: 16153574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical comparison of kyphoplasty versus a titanium mesh implant with cement for stabilization of vertebral compression fractures.
Upasani VV; Robertson C; Lee D; Tomlinson T; Mahar AT
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Sep; 35(19):1783-8. PubMed ID: 20098352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Initial outcome and efficacy of "kyphoplasty" in the treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.
Lieberman IH; Dudeney S; Reinhardt MK; Bell G
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Jul; 26(14):1631-8. PubMed ID: 11464159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An ex vivo biomechanical evaluation of an inflatable bone tamp used in the treatment of compression fracture.
Belkoff SM; Mathis JM; Fenton DC; Scribner RM; Reiley ME; Talmadge K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Jan; 26(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 11154534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Balloon kyphoplasty: an evidence-based analysis.
Medical Advisory Secretariat
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2004; 4(12):1-45. PubMed ID: 23074451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Height restoration of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures using different intravertebral reduction devices: a cadaveric study.
Krüger A; Oberkircher L; Figiel J; Floßdorf F; Bolzinger F; Noriega DC; Ruchholtz S
Spine J; 2015 May; 15(5):1092-8. PubMed ID: 24200410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Vertebral body stenting: a new method for vertebral augmentation versus kyphoplasty.
Rotter R; Martin H; Fuerderer S; Gabl M; Roeder C; Heini P; Mittlmeier T
Eur Spine J; 2010 Jun; 19(6):916-23. PubMed ID: 20191393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of unipedicular and bipedicular kyphoplasty on the stiffness and biomechanical balance of compression fractured vertebrae.
Chen B; Li Y; Xie D; Yang X; Zheng Z
Eur Spine J; 2011 Aug; 20(8):1272-80. PubMed ID: 21384203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Height restoration and preservation in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a biomechanical analysis of standard balloon kyphoplasty versus radiofrequency kyphoplasty in a cadaveric model.
Oberkircher L; Struewer J; Bliemel C; Buecking B; Eschbach DA; Ruchholtz S; Krueger A
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2014 Jul; 27(5):283-9. PubMed ID: 24077411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Height restoration and sustainability using bilateral vertebral augmentation systems for vertebral compression fractures: a cadaveric study.
Holyoak DT; Andreshak TG; Hopkins TJ; Brook AL; Frohbergh ME; Ong KL
Spine J; 2022 Dec; 22(12):2072-2081. PubMed ID: 35753638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical comparison of kyphoplasty with different bone cements.
Tomita S; Molloy S; Jasper LE; Abe M; Belkoff SM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Jun; 29(11):1203-7. PubMed ID: 15167659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cement augmentation in a thoracolumbar fracture model: reduction and stability after balloon kyphoplasty versus vertebral body stenting.
Disch AC; Schmoelz W
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Sep; 39(19):E1147-53. PubMed ID: 24921850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An in vivo comparison of the potential for extravertebral cement leak after vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty.
Phillips FM; Todd Wetzel F; Lieberman I; Campbell-Hupp M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Oct; 27(19):2173-8; discussion 2178-9. PubMed ID: 12394934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Transpedicular balloon kyphoplasty for the selective treatment of osteoporotic thoracolumbar burst fractures in vitro].
Gu XH; Yang HL; Zhang Z
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2009 Feb; 31(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 19317062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Is height restoration possible with a comparatively smaller amount of cement in radiofrequency kyphoplasty using a monopedicle approach?].
Röllinghoff M; Hagel A; Siewe J; Gutteck N; Delank KS; Steinmetz A; Zarghooni K
Z Orthop Unfall; 2013 Apr; 151(2):156-62. PubMed ID: 23619648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Minimum cement volume required in vertebral body augmentation--A biomechanical study comparing the permanent SpineJack device and balloon kyphoplasty in traumatic fracture.
Rotter R; Schmitt L; Gierer P; Schmitz KP; Noriega D; Mittlmeier T; Meeder PJ; Martin H
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2015 Aug; 30(7):720-5. PubMed ID: 25971847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
