These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28107637)
21. Load-bearing capacity under fatigue and FEA analysis of simplified ceramic restorations supported by Peek or zirconia polycrystals as foundation substrate for implant purposes. Soares PM; Cadore-Rodrigues AC; Souto Borges AL; Valandro LF; Pereira GKR; Rippe MP J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Nov; 123():104760. PubMed ID: 34418777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Crown fracture: Failure load, stress distribution, and fractographic analysis. Campos RE; Soares PV; Versluis A; de O Júnior OB; Ambrosano GM; Nunes IF J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Sep; 114(3):447-55. PubMed ID: 26001492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effect of various veneering techniques on mechanical strength of computer-controlled zirconia framework designs. Kanat B; Cömlekoğlu EM; Dündar-Çömlekoğlu M; Hakan Sen B; Ozcan M; Ali Güngör M J Prosthodont; 2014 Aug; 23(6):445-55. PubMed ID: 24417370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Fatigue resistance of CAD/CAM complete crowns with a simplified cementation process. Carvalho AO; Bruzi G; Giannini M; Magne P J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Apr; 111(4):310-7. PubMed ID: 24388720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Numerical fatigue analysis of premolars restored by CAD/CAM ceramic crowns. Homaei E; Jin XZ; Pow EHN; Matinlinna JP; Tsoi JK; Farhangdoost K Dent Mater; 2018 Jul; 34(7):e149-e157. PubMed ID: 29653725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Fracture resistance of crowns cemented on titanium and zirconia implant abutments: a comparison of monolithic versus manually veneered all-ceramic systems. Martínez-Rus F; Ferreiroa A; Özcan M; Bartolomé JF; Pradíes G Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(6):1448-55. PubMed ID: 23189296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effect of elasticity on stress distribution in CAD/CAM dental crowns: Glass ceramic vs. polymer-matrix composite. Duan Y; Griggs JA J Dent; 2015 Jun; 43(6):742-9. PubMed ID: 25625675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Fracture Strength of Zirconia and Alumina Ceramic Crowns Supported by Implants. Traini T; Sorrentino R; Gherlone E; Perfetti F; Bollero P; Zarone F J Oral Implantol; 2015 Jul; 41 Spec No():352-9. PubMed ID: 24779915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Influence of the foundation substrate on the fatigue behavior of bonded glass, zirconia polycrystals, and polymer infiltrated ceramic simplified CAD-CAM restorations. Machry RV; Borges ALS; Pereira GKR; Kleverlaan CJ; Venturini AB; Valandro LF J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 May; 117():104391. PubMed ID: 33618242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Using a chewing simulator for fatigue testing of metal ceramic crowns. Heintze SD; Eser A; Monreal D; Rousson V J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Jan; 65():770-780. PubMed ID: 27771595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The effect of different abutment and restorative crown materials on stress distribution in single-unit implant-supported restorations: A 3D finite element stress analysis. Gökçimen G; Durkan R; Deste Gökay G; Oyar P J Prosthodont; 2024 Jun; 33(5):497-505. PubMed ID: 37434476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]