BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28108780)

  • 1. Cement-augmented screws in a cervical two-level corpectomy with anterior titanium mesh cage reconstruction: a biomechanical study.
    Hartmann S; Thomé C; Tschugg A; Paesold J; Kavakebi P; Schmölz W
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Apr; 26(4):1047-1057. PubMed ID: 28108780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Construct stability of an instrumented 2-level cervical corpectomy model following fatigue testing: biomechanical comparison of circumferential antero-posterior instrumentation versus a novel anterior-only transpedicular screw-plate fixation technique.
    Koller H; Schmoelz W; Zenner J; Auffarth A; Resch H; Hitzl W; Malekzadeh D; Ernstbrunner L; Blocher M; Mayer M
    Eur Spine J; 2015 Dec; 24(12):2848-56. PubMed ID: 25612849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomechanical testing of circumferential instrumentation after cervical multilevel corpectomy.
    Hartmann S; Thomé C; Keiler A; Fritsch H; Hegewald AA; Schmölz W
    Eur Spine J; 2015 Dec; 24(12):2788-98. PubMed ID: 26233243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Anterior cement augmentation of adjacent levels after vertebral body replacement leads to superior stability of the corpectomy cage under cyclic loading-a biomechanical investigation.
    Oberkircher L; Krüger A; Hörth D; Hack J; Ruchholtz S; Fleege C; Rauschmann M; Arabmotlagh M
    Spine J; 2018 Mar; 18(3):525-531. PubMed ID: 29174458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical comparison of transfacet screws to lateral mass screw-rod constructs in the lower cervical spine.
    Tong J; Ji W; Zhou R; Huang Z; Liu S; Zhu Q
    Eur Spine J; 2016 Jun; 25(6):1787-93. PubMed ID: 26530298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The stabilizing potential of anterior, posterior and combined techniques for the reconstruction of a 2-level cervical corpectomy model: biomechanical study and first results of ATPS prototyping.
    Koller H; Schmidt R; Mayer M; Hitzl W; Zenner J; Midderhoff S; Graf N; Resch H; Wilke HJ
    Eur Spine J; 2010 Dec; 19(12):2137-48. PubMed ID: 20589516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical comparison of anterior cervical spine instrumentation techniques with and without supplemental posterior fusion after different corpectomy and discectomy combinations: Laboratory investigation.
    Setzer M; Eleraky M; Johnson WM; Aghayev K; Tran ND; Vrionis FD
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jun; 16(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 22423633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical comparison of instrumented and uninstrumented multilevel cervical discectomy versus corpectomy.
    Galler RM; Dogan S; Fifield MS; Bozkus H; Chamberlain RH; Sonntag VK; Crawford NR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(11):1220-6. PubMed ID: 17495779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical comparison of two-level cervical locking posterior screw/rod and hook/rod techniques.
    Espinoza-Larios A; Ames CP; Chamberlain RH; Sonntag VK; Dickman CA; Crawford NR
    Spine J; 2007; 7(2):194-204. PubMed ID: 17321969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanical comparison of cervical spine reconstructive techniques after a multilevel corpectomy of the cervical spine.
    Singh K; Vaccaro AR; Kim J; Lorenz EP; Lim TH; An HS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):2352-8; discussion 2358. PubMed ID: 14560082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A biomechanical comparison of three anterior thoracolumbar implants after corpectomy: are two screws better than one?
    Chou D; Larios AE; Chamberlain RH; Fifield MS; Hartl R; Dickman CA; Sonntag VK; Crawford NR
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2006 Mar; 4(3):213-8. PubMed ID: 16572620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics.
    Cunningham BW; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC
    Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 20362252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Two in vivo surgical approaches for lumbar corpectomy using allograft and a metallic implant: a controlled clinical and biomechanical study.
    Huang P; Gupta MC; Sarigul-Klijn N; Hazelwood S
    Spine J; 2006; 6(6):648-58. PubMed ID: 17088195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Plate fixation in the cervical spine: traditional paramedian screw configuration compared with unique unilateral configuration.
    Mageswaran P; McLain RF; Colbrunn R; Bonner T; Hothem E; Bartsch A
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Jun; 18(6):575-81. PubMed ID: 23600582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Corpectomy versus discectomy for the treatment of multilevel cervical spine pathology: a finite element model analysis.
    Hussain M; Nassr A; Natarajan RN; An HS; Andersson GB
    Spine J; 2012 May; 12(5):401-8. PubMed ID: 22572585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical analysis of multilevel cervical corpectomy and plate constructs.
    Porter RW; Crawford NR; Chamberlain RH; Park SC; Detwiler PW; Apostolides PJ; Sonntag VK
    J Neurosurg; 2003 Jul; 99(1 Suppl):98-103. PubMed ID: 12859068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanics of an integrated interbody device versus ACDF anterior locking plate in a single-level cervical spine fusion construct.
    Stein MI; Nayak AN; Gaskins RB; Cabezas AF; Santoni BG; Castellvi AE
    Spine J; 2014 Jan; 14(1):128-36. PubMed ID: 24231054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanics of Cervical "Skip" Corpectomy Versus Standard Multilevel Corpectomy.
    Yilmaz M; Yüksel KZ; Baek S; Newcomb AG; Dalbayrak S; Sonntag VK; Crawford NR
    Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Apr; 30(3):E152-E161. PubMed ID: 22801457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical comparison of a two-level anterior discectomy and a one-level corpectomy, combined with fusion and anterior plate reconstruction in the cervical spine.
    Aghayev K; Doulgeris JJ; Gonzalez-Blohm SA; Eleraky M; Lee WE; Vrionis FD
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2014 Jan; 29(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 24239024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical analysis of an interbody cage with three integrated cancellous lag screws in a two-level cervical spine fusion construct: an in vitro study.
    Nayak AN; Stein MI; James CR; Gaskins RB; Cabezas AF; Adu-Lartey M; Castellvi AE; Santoni BG
    Spine J; 2014 Dec; 14(12):3002-10. PubMed ID: 24948039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.