These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

489 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28108898)

  • 1. Bioresorbable Scaffolds for Coronary Artery Disease.
    Nathan A; Kobayashi T; Kolansky DM; Wilensky RL; Giri J
    Curr Cardiol Rep; 2017 Jan; 19(1):5. PubMed ID: 28108898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds versus everolimus-eluting metallic stents: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
    Cassese S; Byrne RA; Ndrepepa G; Kufner S; Wiebe J; Repp J; Schunkert H; Fusaro M; Kimura T; Kastrati A
    Lancet; 2016 Feb; 387(10018):537-544. PubMed ID: 26597771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds for Coronary Artery Disease.
    Ellis SG; Kereiakes DJ; Metzger DC; Caputo RP; Rizik DG; Teirstein PS; Litt MR; Kini A; Kabour A; Marx SO; Popma JJ; McGreevy R; Zhang Z; Simonton C; Stone GW;
    N Engl J Med; 2015 Nov; 373(20):1905-15. PubMed ID: 26457558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. 1-Year Outcomes of Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stents: A Propensity-Matched Comparison of the GHOST-EU and XIENCE V USA Registries.
    Tamburino C; Capranzano P; Gori T; Latib A; Lesiak M; Nef H; Caramanno G; Naber C; Mehilli J; Di Mario C; Sabaté M; Münzel T; Colombo A; Araszkiewicz A; Wiebe J; Geraci S; Jensen C; Mattesini A; Brugaletta S; Capodanno D
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Mar; 9(5):440-9. PubMed ID: 26875648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Incidence and Potential Mechanism(s) of Post-Procedural Rise of Cardiac Biomarker in Patients With Coronary Artery Narrowing After Implantation of an Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold or Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stent.
    Ishibashi Y; Muramatsu T; Nakatani S; Sotomi Y; Suwannasom P; Grundeken MJ; Cho YK; Garcia-Garcia HM; van Boven AJ; Piek JJ; Sabaté M; Helqvist S; Baumbach A; McClean D; de Sousa Almeida M; Wasungu L; Miquel-Hebert K; Dudek D; Chevalier B; Onuma Y; Serruys PW
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Jul; 8(8):1053-1063. PubMed ID: 26205444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Temporal Trends in Adverse Events After Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Versus Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stent Implantation: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Montone RA; Niccoli G; De Marco F; Minelli S; D'Ascenzo F; Testa L; Bedogni F; Crea F
    Circulation; 2017 May; 135(22):2145-2154. PubMed ID: 28559495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A bioresorbable everolimus-eluting scaffold versus a metallic everolimus-eluting stent for ischaemic heart disease caused by de-novo native coronary artery lesions (ABSORB II): an interim 1-year analysis of clinical and procedural secondary outcomes from a randomised controlled trial.
    Serruys PW; Chevalier B; Dudek D; Cequier A; Carrié D; Iniguez A; Dominici M; van der Schaaf RJ; Haude M; Wasungu L; Veldhof S; Peng L; Staehr P; Grundeken MJ; Ishibashi Y; Garcia-Garcia HM; Onuma Y
    Lancet; 2015 Jan; 385(9962):43-54. PubMed ID: 25230593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus everolimus-eluting metallic stent in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: 1-year results of a propensity score matching comparison: the BVS-EXAMINATION Study (bioresorbable vascular scaffold-a clinical evaluation of everolimus eluting coronary stents in the treatment of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction).
    Brugaletta S; Gori T; Low AF; Tousek P; Pinar E; Gomez-Lara J; Scalone G; Schulz E; Chan MY; Kocka V; Hurtado J; Gomez-Hospital JA; Münzel T; Lee CH; Cequier A; Valdés M; Widimsky P; Serruys PW; Sabaté M
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Jan; 8(1 Pt B):189-197. PubMed ID: 25616924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Incidence and imaging outcomes of acute scaffold disruption and late structural discontinuity after implantation of the absorb Everolimus-Eluting fully bioresorbable vascular scaffold: optical coherence tomography assessment in the ABSORB cohort B Trial (A Clinical Evaluation of the Bioabsorbable Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions).
    Onuma Y; Serruys PW; Muramatsu T; Nakatani S; van Geuns RJ; de Bruyne B; Dudek D; Christiansen E; Smits PC; Chevalier B; McClean D; Koolen J; Windecker S; Whitbourn R; Meredith I; Garcia-Garcia HM; Veldhof S; Rapoza R; Ormiston JA
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Dec; 7(12):1400-11. PubMed ID: 25523532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mechanical properties of the everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold compared to the metallic everolimus-eluting stent.
    Dalos D; Gangl C; Roth C; Krenn L; Scherzer S; Vertesich M; Lang I; Maurer G; Neunteufl T; Berger R; Delle-Karth G
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2016 May; 16():104. PubMed ID: 27225486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Incidence and short-term clinical outcomes of small side branch occlusion after implantation of an everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold: an interim report of 435 patients in the ABSORB-EXTEND single-arm trial in comparison with an everolimus-eluting metallic stent in the SPIRIT first and II trials.
    Muramatsu T; Onuma Y; García-García HM; Farooq V; Bourantas CV; Morel MA; Li X; Veldhof S; Bartorelli A; Whitbourn R; Abizaid A; Serruys PW;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Mar; 6(3):247-57. PubMed ID: 23517836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Randomised comparison of a bioresorbable everolimus-eluting scaffold with a metallic everolimus-eluting stent for ischaemic heart disease caused by de novo native coronary artery lesions: the 2-year clinical outcomes of the ABSORB II trial.
    Chevalier B; Onuma Y; van Boven AJ; Piek JJ; Sabaté M; Helqvist S; Baumbach A; Smits PC; Kumar R; Wasungu L; Serruys PW
    EuroIntervention; 2016 Oct; 12(9):1102-1107. PubMed ID: 27564310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of everolimus- and biolimus-eluting coronary stents with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: Two-year clinical outcomes of the EVERBIO II trial.
    Arroyo D; Gendre G; Schukraft S; Kallinikou Z; Müller O; Baeriswyl G; Stauffer JC; Goy JJ; Togni M; Cook S; Puricel S
    Int J Cardiol; 2017 Sep; 243():121-125. PubMed ID: 28576627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Arterial healing following primary PCI using the Absorb everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold (Absorb BVS) versus the durable polymer everolimus-eluting metallic stent (XIENCE) in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: rationale and design of the randomised TROFI II study.
    Räber L; Onuma Y; Brugaletta S; Garcia-Garcia HM; Backx B; Iñiguez A; Okkels Jensen L; Cequier-Fillat À; Pilgrim T; Christiansen EH; Hofma SH; Suttorp M; Serruys PW; Sabaté M; Windecker S
    EuroIntervention; 2016 Jul; 12(4):482-9. PubMed ID: 26342471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds for the treatment of coronary artery disease: what have we learned from randomized-controlled clinical trials?
    Rizik DG; Hermiller JB; Simonton CA; Klassen KJ; Kereiakes DJ
    Coron Artery Dis; 2017 Jan; 28(1):77-89. PubMed ID: 27561169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Head-to-head comparison of the neointimal response between metallic and bioresorbable everolimus-eluting scaffolds using optical coherence tomography.
    Gomez-Lara J; Brugaletta S; Farooq V; Onuma Y; Diletti R; Windecker S; Thuesen L; McClean D; Koolen J; Whitbourn R; Dudek D; Smits PC; Chevalier B; Regar E; Veldhof S; Rapoza R; Ormiston JA; Garcia-Garcia HM; Serruys PW
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Dec; 4(12):1271-80. PubMed ID: 22192368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of everolimus- and biolimus-eluting coronary stents with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds.
    Puricel S; Arroyo D; Corpataux N; Baeriswyl G; Lehmann S; Kallinikou Z; Muller O; Allard L; Stauffer JC; Togni M; Goy JJ; Cook S
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2015 Mar; 65(8):791-801. PubMed ID: 25720622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bioresorbable vascular scaffold in patients with complex coronary artery disease.
    Tamburino CI; Capranzano P; Longo G; Immè S; Tamburino G; Scalia M; Condorelli A; Francaviglia B; LA Manna A; Sgroi C; Grasso C; DI Salvo ME; Capodanno D; Tamburino C
    Minerva Cardioangiol; 2016 Aug; 64(4):481-6. PubMed ID: 27128353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A case of true left main bifurcation treated with bioresorbable everolimus-eluting stent v-stenting.
    Sato K; Latib A; Panoulas VF; Naganuma T; Miyazaki T; Colombo A
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Aug; 7(8):e103-4. PubMed ID: 25086841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fully bioresorbable drug-eluting coronary scaffolds: A review.
    Charpentier E; Barna A; Guillevin L; Juliard JM
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2015; 108(6-7):385-97. PubMed ID: 26113479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.