These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2810946)

  • 1. [A multi-purpose voice recording and encoding device using a micro computer].
    Kawai M; Yoshizaki K; Ito K
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1989 Jun; 60(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 2810946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Calibration of Clinical Audio Recording and Analysis Systems for Sound Intensity Measurement.
    Maryn Y; Zarowski A
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2015 Nov; 24(4):608-18. PubMed ID: 26161588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A computer program for sequencing and presenting complex sounds for auditory neuroimaging studies.
    Kieckhefer E; Kanwal JS
    J Neurosci Methods; 2000 Aug; 101(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 10967360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of sampling rate on accuracy and reliability of acoustic voice analysis.
    Deliyski DD; Shaw HS; Evans MK
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2005; 30(2):55-62. PubMed ID: 16147224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceptual-Auditory and Acoustical Analysis of the Voices of Transgender Women.
    Schwarz K; Fontanari AMV; Costa AB; Soll BMB; da Silva DC; de Sá Villas-Bôas AP; Cielo CA; Bastilha GR; Ribeiro VV; Dorfman MEKY; Lobato MIR
    J Voice; 2018 Sep; 32(5):602-608. PubMed ID: 28965663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mobile Digital Recording: Adequacy of the iRig and iOS Device for Acoustic and Perceptual Analysis of Normal Voice.
    Oliveira G; Fava G; Baglione M; Pimpinella M
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):236-242. PubMed ID: 27423820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Acoustic voice analysis using the Praat program: comparative study with the Dr. Speech program].
    Núñez Batalla F; González Márquez R; Peláez González MB; González Laborda I; Fernández Fernández M; Morato Galán M
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 2014; 65(3):170-6. PubMed ID: 24679848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multimedia stimulation for psychophysiological investigation.
    McCullagh PJ; Gent GP; McAllister HG
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1999; 68():631-5. PubMed ID: 10724966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A methodological study of perturbation and additive noise in synthetically generated voice signals.
    Hillenbrand J
    J Speech Hear Res; 1987 Dec; 30(4):448-61. PubMed ID: 2961932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Personal computer program for processing data from patients with colo-rectal cancer.
    Karouji S; Hayashi K; Morita T; Konn M; Ono K
    Med Inform (Lond); 1987; 12(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 3586762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of two algorithms for detecting human frequency-following responses to voice pitch.
    Jeng FC; Hu J; Dickman B; Lin CY; Lin CD; Wang CY; Chung HK; Li X
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 21047294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A concept for a research tool for experiments with cochlear implant users.
    Geurts L; Wouters J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Dec; 108(6):2949-56. PubMed ID: 11144586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Toward improved ecological validity in the acoustic measurement of overall voice quality: combining continuous speech and sustained vowels.
    Maryn Y; Corthals P; Van Cauwenberge P; Roy N; De Bodt M
    J Voice; 2010 Sep; 24(5):540-55. PubMed ID: 19883993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An IBM-PC and Commodore 64 microcomputer-based system for elicitation and recording of eyeblink reflexes.
    Flaten MA; Vaksdal A; Hugdahl K
    Biol Psychol; 1989 Dec; 29(3):291-8. PubMed ID: 2640162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [CILAB--a PC-based laboratory speech processor for implementation and evaluation of new stimulation strategies for cochlear implants].
    Mitterbacher A; Lampacher P; Zierhofer C; Hochmair E
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2004 Jun; 49(6):146-52. PubMed ID: 15279463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The visual sort and rate method for perceptual evaluation in listening tests.
    Granqvist S
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2003; 28(3):109-16. PubMed ID: 14596329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical evaluation of higher stimulation rates in the nucleus research platform 8 system.
    Plant K; Holden L; Skinner M; Arcaroli J; Whitford L; Law MA; Nel E
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):381-93. PubMed ID: 17485987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of acoustic voice perturbation measures among three independent voice laboratories.
    Karnell MP; Scherer RS; Fischer LB
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Aug; 34(4):781-90. PubMed ID: 1956185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. From electric acoustic stimulation to improved sound coding in cochlear implants.
    Nopp P; Polak M
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2010; 67():88-95. PubMed ID: 19955725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of working memory in dichotic-listening studies of auditory laterality.
    Penner IK; Schläfli K; Opwis K; Hugdahl K
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2009 Nov; 31(8):959-66. PubMed ID: 19358008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.