These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28109534)

  • 1. Categorization-based stranger avoidance does not explain the uncanny valley effect.
    MacDorman KF; Chattopadhyay D
    Cognition; 2017 Apr; 161():132-135. PubMed ID: 28109534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Familiar faces rendered strange: Why inconsistent realism drives characters into the uncanny valley.
    Chattopadhyay D; MacDorman KF
    J Vis; 2016 Sep; 16(11):7. PubMed ID: 27611063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. When categorization-based stranger avoidance explains the uncanny valley: A comment on MacDorman and Chattopadhyay (2016).
    Kawabe T; Sasaki K; Ihaya K; Yamada Y
    Cognition; 2017 Apr; 161():129-131. PubMed ID: 27642031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Infants prefer the faces of strangers or mothers to morphed faces: an uncanny valley between social novelty and familiarity.
    Matsuda YT; Okamoto Y; Ida M; Okanoya K; Myowa-Yamakoshi M
    Biol Lett; 2012 Oct; 8(5):725-8. PubMed ID: 22696289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reducing consistency in human realism increases the uncanny valley effect; increasing category uncertainty does not.
    MacDorman KF; Chattopadhyay D
    Cognition; 2016 Jan; 146():190-205. PubMed ID: 26435049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Creepy cats and strange high houses: Support for configural processing in testing predictions of nine uncanny valley theories.
    Diel A; MacDorman KF
    J Vis; 2021 Apr; 21(4):1. PubMed ID: 33792617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A review of empirical evidence on different uncanny valley hypotheses: support for perceptual mismatch as one road to the valley of eeriness.
    Kätsyri J; Förger K; Mäkäräinen M; Takala T
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():390. PubMed ID: 25914661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A reappraisal of the uncanny valley: categorical perception or frequency-based sensitization?
    Burleigh TJ; Schoenherr JR
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():1488. PubMed ID: 25653623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Uncanny Valley Does Not Interfere with Level 1 Visual Perspective Taking.
    MacDorman KF; Srinivas P; Patel H
    Comput Human Behav; 2013 Jul; 29(4):1671-1685. PubMed ID: 25221383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Investigating the uncanny valley for prosthetic hands.
    Poliakoff E; O'Kane S; Carefoot O; Kyberd P; Gowen E
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Feb; 42(1):21-27. PubMed ID: 29412089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Too real for comfort? Uncanny responses to computer generated faces.
    MacDorman KF; Green RD; Ho CC; Koch CT
    Comput Human Behav; 2009 May; 25(3):695-710. PubMed ID: 25506126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A mismatch in the human realism of face and voice produces an uncanny valley.
    Mitchell WJ; Szerszen KA; Lu AS; Schermerhorn PW; Scheutz M; Macdorman KF
    Iperception; 2011; 2(1):10-2. PubMed ID: 23145223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Avoidance of Novelty Contributes to the Uncanny Valley.
    Sasaki K; Ihaya K; Yamada Y
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1792. PubMed ID: 29123490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can looking at a hand make your skin crawl? Peering into the uncanny valley for hands.
    Poliakoff E; Beach N; Best R; Howard T; Gowen E
    Perception; 2013; 42(9):998-1000. PubMed ID: 24386720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differential effects of face-realism and emotion on event-related brain potentials and their implications for the uncanny valley theory.
    Schindler S; Zell E; Botsch M; Kissler J
    Sci Rep; 2017 Mar; 7():45003. PubMed ID: 28332557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Understanding the Uncanny: Both Atypical Features and Category Ambiguity Provoke Aversion toward Humanlike Robots.
    Strait MK; Floerke VA; Ju W; Maddox K; Remedios JD; Jung MF; Urry HL
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1366. PubMed ID: 28912736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Venturing into the uncanny valley of mind-The influence of mind attribution on the acceptance of human-like characters in a virtual reality setting.
    Stein JP; Ohler P
    Cognition; 2017 Mar; 160():43-50. PubMed ID: 28043026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The doctor's digital double: how warmth, competence, and animation promote adherence intention.
    Dai Z; MacDorman KF
    PeerJ Comput Sci; 2018; 4():e168. PubMed ID: 33816821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Walking in the uncanny valley: importance of the attractiveness on the acceptance of a robot as a working partner.
    Destephe M; Brandao M; Kishi T; Zecca M; Hashimoto K; Takanishi A
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():204. PubMed ID: 25762967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Uncanny Valley Effects on Friendship Decisions in Virtual Social Networking Service.
    Shin M; Song SW; Chock TM
    Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2019 Nov; 22(11):700-705. PubMed ID: 31613640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.