959 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28109761)
1. Survivorship of Metaphyseal Sleeves in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Chalmers BP; Desy NM; Pagnano MW; Trousdale RT; Taunton MJ
J Arthroplasty; 2017 May; 32(5):1565-1570. PubMed ID: 28109761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Porous-Coated Metaphyseal Sleeves for Severe Femoral and Tibial Bone Loss in Revision TKA.
Watters TS; Martin JR; Levy DL; Yang CC; Kim RH; Dennis DA
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Nov; 32(11):3468-3473. PubMed ID: 28697864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Survivorship of Metaphyseal Cones and Sleeves in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Heidenreich MJ; Lanting BA; McCalden RW; Naudie DD; Howard JL; MacDonald SJ; Vasarhelyi EM
J Arthroplasty; 2022 Jun; 37(6S):S263-S269. PubMed ID: 35257822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Knee revision arthroplasty : cementless, metaphyseal fixation with sleeves].
Graichen H; Strauch M; Scior W; Morgan-Jones R
Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2015 Feb; 27(1):24-34. PubMed ID: 25620192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Revision total knee arthroplasty using metaphyseal sleeves at short-term follow-up.
Huang R; Barrazueta G; Ong A; Orozco F; Jafari M; Coyle C; Austin M
Orthopedics; 2014 Sep; 37(9):e804-9. PubMed ID: 25350623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Metaphyseal Sleeves in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Provide Reliable Fixation and Excellent Medium to Long-Term Implant Survivorship.
Bloch BV; Shannak OA; Palan J; Phillips JRA; James PJ
J Arthroplasty; 2020 Feb; 35(2):495-499. PubMed ID: 31606290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Varus-valgus constraint in 416 revision total knee arthroplasties with cemented stems provides a reliable reconstruction with a low subsequent revision rate at early to mid-term review.
Limberg AK; Tibbo ME; Pagnano MW; Perry KI; Hanssen AD; Abdel MP
Bone Joint J; 2020 Apr; 102-B(4):458-462. PubMed ID: 32228079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Total knee arthroplasty after distal femoral osteotomy long-term survivorship and clinical outcomes.
Chalmers BP; Limberg AK; Athey AG; Perry KI; Pagnano MW; Abdel MP
Bone Joint J; 2019 Jun; 101-B(6):660-666. PubMed ID: 31154844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intermediate-Term Survivorship of Metaphyseal Cones and Sleeves in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Small I; Meghpara M; Stein J; Goh GS; Banerjee S; Courtney PM
J Arthroplasty; 2022 Sep; 37(9):1839-1843. PubMed ID: 35398228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Direct, Cementless, Metaphyseal Fixation in Knee Revision Arthroplasty With Sleeves-Short-Term Results.
Graichen H; Scior W; Strauch M
J Arthroplasty; 2015 Dec; 30(12):2256-9. PubMed ID: 26209287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Revision total knee arthroplasty with porous-coated metaphyseal sleeves provides radiographic ingrowth and stable fixation.
Fedorka CJ; Chen AF; Pagnotto MR; Crossett LS; Klatt BA
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2018 May; 26(5):1500-1505. PubMed ID: 28314891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Metaphyseal Fixation Using Highly Porous Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Minimum Two Year Follow Up Study.
Denehy KM; Abhari S; Krebs VE; Higuera-Rueda CA; Samuel LT; Sultan AA; Mont MA; Malkani AL
J Arthroplasty; 2019 Oct; 34(10):2439-2443. PubMed ID: 31000405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty With a Rotating-Hinge Prosthesis Mated to a Well-Fixed Femoral Sleeve.
Hannon CP; Stuart MB; Abdel MP; Pagnano MW; Trousdale RT
J Arthroplasty; 2022 Jun; 37(6S):S270-S275. PubMed ID: 35227812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Metaphyseal Sleeves for Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Good Short-Term Outcomes.
Bugler KE; Maheshwari R; Ahmed I; Brenkel IJ; Walmsley PJ
J Arthroplasty; 2015 Nov; 30(11):1990-4. PubMed ID: 26115984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Metaphyseal sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasty: Minimum seven-year follow-up study.
Agarwal S; Neogi DS; Morgan-Jones R
Knee; 2018 Dec; 25(6):1299-1307. PubMed ID: 30297257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of varying stem and metaphyseal sleeve size on the primary stability of cementless revision tibial trays used to reconstruct AORI IIA defects. A simulation study.
Awadalla M; Al-Dirini RMA; O'Rourke D; Solomon LB; Heldreth M; Taylor M
J Orthop Res; 2018 Jul; 36(7):1876-1886. PubMed ID: 29327379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Septic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Treatment of Metaphyseal Bone Defects Using Metaphyseal Sleeves.
Klim SM; Amerstorfer F; Bernhardt GA; Sadoghi P; Gruber G; Radl R; Leithner A; Glehr M
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Dec; 33(12):3734-3738. PubMed ID: 30224100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Midterm Results of Porous Tantalum Femoral Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Potter GD; Abdel MP; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Aug; 98(15):1286-91. PubMed ID: 27489319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Distribution of Bone Ongrowth in Metaphyseal Sleeves for Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrieval Analysis.
Ihekweazu UN; Weitzler L; Wright TM; Padgett DE
J Arthroplasty; 2019 Apr; 34(4):760-765. PubMed ID: 30718170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Management of the bone loss by metaphyseal sleeves in primary and revision knee arthroplasty: clinical experience and outcome after forty three cases.
Gill UN; Ahmed N; Noor SS; Memon IA; Memon ZA
Int Orthop; 2020 Nov; 44(11):2315-2320. PubMed ID: 32556384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
