These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Lexical Predictability During Natural Reading: Effects of Surprisal and Entropy Reduction. Lowder MW; Choi W; Ferreira F; Henderson JM Cogn Sci; 2018 Jun; 42 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):1166-1183. PubMed ID: 29442360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Portions and sorts in Icelandic: an ERP study. Whelpton M; Trotter D; Beck TG; Anderson C; Maling J; Durvasula K; Beretta A Brain Lang; 2014 Sep; 136():44-57. PubMed ID: 25129630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations. Hagoort P J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):883-99. PubMed ID: 14511541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Complement Coercion in Mandarin Chinese: Evidence from a Self-paced Reading Study. Xue W; Liu M J Psycholinguist Res; 2021 Aug; 50(4):757-776. PubMed ID: 33206288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Eye-Tracking and Corpus-Based Analyses of Syntax-Semantics Interactions in Complement Coercion. Lowder MW; Gordon PC Lang Cogn Neurosci; 2016; 31(7):921-939. PubMed ID: 28529960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The manuscript that we finished: structural separation reduces the cost of complement coercion. Lowder MW; Gordon PC J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Mar; 41(2):526-40. PubMed ID: 24999707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Coercion and compositionality. Baggio G; Choma T; van Lambalgen M; Hagoort P J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Sep; 22(9):2131-40. PubMed ID: 19583469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Language structure in the brain: A fixation-related fMRI study of syntactic surprisal in reading. Henderson JM; Choi W; Lowder MW; Ferreira F Neuroimage; 2016 May; 132():293-300. PubMed ID: 26908322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cortical Tracking of Surprisal during Continuous Speech Comprehension. Weissbart H; Kandylaki KD; Reichenbach T J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Jan; 32(1):155-166. PubMed ID: 31479349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does the speaker matter? Online processing of semantic and pragmatic information in L2 speech comprehension. Foucart A; Garcia X; Ayguasanosa M; Thierry G; Martin C; Costa A Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():291-303. PubMed ID: 26115602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Neurobehavioral Correlates of Surprisal in Language Comprehension: A Neurocomputational Model. Brouwer H; Delogu F; Venhuizen NJ; Crocker MW Front Psychol; 2021; 12():615538. PubMed ID: 33643143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The difficult mountain: enriched composition in adjective-noun phrases. Frisson S; Pickering MJ; McElree B Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Dec; 18(6):1172-9. PubMed ID: 21826403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Neurodynamics of sentence interpretation: ERP evidence from French. Isel F; Hahne A; Maess B; Friederici AD Biol Psychol; 2007 Mar; 74(3):337-46. PubMed ID: 17011692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The difficulty of coercion: a response to de Almeida. Pickering MJ; McElree B; Traxler MJ Brain Lang; 2005 Apr; 93(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 15766763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using complement coercion to understand the neural basis of semantic composition: evidence from an fMRI study. Husband EM; Kelly LA; Zhu DC J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Nov; 23(11):3254-66. PubMed ID: 21557650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]