These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28109781)

  • 1. Teasing apart coercion and surprisal: Evidence from eye-movements and ERPs.
    Delogu F; Crocker MW; Drenhaus H
    Cognition; 2017 Apr; 161():46-59. PubMed ID: 28109781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Complement coercion is not modulated by competition: evidence from eye movements.
    Frisson S; McElree B
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 18194051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of Surprisal and Locality on Danish Sentence Processing: An Eye-Tracking Investigation.
    Balling LW; Kizach J
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2017 Oct; 46(5):1119-1136. PubMed ID: 28332141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Processing events: behavioral and neuromagnetic correlates of Aspectual Coercion.
    Brennan J; Pylkkänen L
    Brain Lang; 2008 Aug; 106(2):132-43. PubMed ID: 18561993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual scenes trigger immediate syntactic reanalysis: evidence from ERPs during situated spoken comprehension.
    Knoeferle P; Habets B; Crocker MW; Münte TF
    Cereb Cortex; 2008 Apr; 18(4):789-95. PubMed ID: 17644830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lexical Predictability During Natural Reading: Effects of Surprisal and Entropy Reduction.
    Lowder MW; Choi W; Ferreira F; Henderson JM
    Cogn Sci; 2018 Jun; 42 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):1166-1183. PubMed ID: 29442360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Portions and sorts in Icelandic: an ERP study.
    Whelpton M; Trotter D; Beck TG; Anderson C; Maling J; Durvasula K; Beretta A
    Brain Lang; 2014 Sep; 136():44-57. PubMed ID: 25129630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations.
    Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):883-99. PubMed ID: 14511541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Complement Coercion in Mandarin Chinese: Evidence from a Self-paced Reading Study.
    Xue W; Liu M
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2021 Aug; 50(4):757-776. PubMed ID: 33206288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Eye-Tracking and Corpus-Based Analyses of Syntax-Semantics Interactions in Complement Coercion.
    Lowder MW; Gordon PC
    Lang Cogn Neurosci; 2016; 31(7):921-939. PubMed ID: 28529960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The manuscript that we finished: structural separation reduces the cost of complement coercion.
    Lowder MW; Gordon PC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Mar; 41(2):526-40. PubMed ID: 24999707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Coercion and compositionality.
    Baggio G; Choma T; van Lambalgen M; Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Sep; 22(9):2131-40. PubMed ID: 19583469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Language structure in the brain: A fixation-related fMRI study of syntactic surprisal in reading.
    Henderson JM; Choi W; Lowder MW; Ferreira F
    Neuroimage; 2016 May; 132():293-300. PubMed ID: 26908322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cortical Tracking of Surprisal during Continuous Speech Comprehension.
    Weissbart H; Kandylaki KD; Reichenbach T
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Jan; 32(1):155-166. PubMed ID: 31479349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does the speaker matter? Online processing of semantic and pragmatic information in L2 speech comprehension.
    Foucart A; Garcia X; Ayguasanosa M; Thierry G; Martin C; Costa A
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():291-303. PubMed ID: 26115602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neurobehavioral Correlates of Surprisal in Language Comprehension: A Neurocomputational Model.
    Brouwer H; Delogu F; Venhuizen NJ; Crocker MW
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():615538. PubMed ID: 33643143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The difficult mountain: enriched composition in adjective-noun phrases.
    Frisson S; Pickering MJ; McElree B
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Dec; 18(6):1172-9. PubMed ID: 21826403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neurodynamics of sentence interpretation: ERP evidence from French.
    Isel F; Hahne A; Maess B; Friederici AD
    Biol Psychol; 2007 Mar; 74(3):337-46. PubMed ID: 17011692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The difficulty of coercion: a response to de Almeida.
    Pickering MJ; McElree B; Traxler MJ
    Brain Lang; 2005 Apr; 93(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 15766763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using complement coercion to understand the neural basis of semantic composition: evidence from an fMRI study.
    Husband EM; Kelly LA; Zhu DC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Nov; 23(11):3254-66. PubMed ID: 21557650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.