177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28110273)
1. Shifting Balance on a Static Mutation-Selection Landscape: A Novel Scenario of Positive Selection.
Jones CT; Youssef N; Susko E; Bielawski JP
Mol Biol Evol; 2017 Feb; 34(2):391-407. PubMed ID: 28110273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The relationship between dN/dS and scaled selection coefficients.
Spielman SJ; Wilke CO
Mol Biol Evol; 2015 Apr; 32(4):1097-108. PubMed ID: 25576365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Looking for Darwin in Genomic Sequences: Validity and Success Depends on the Relationship Between Model and Data.
Jones CT; Susko E; Bielawski JP
Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1910():399-426. PubMed ID: 31278672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Why time matters: codon evolution and the temporal dynamics of dN/dS.
Mugal CF; Wolf JB; Kaj I
Mol Biol Evol; 2014 Jan; 31(1):212-31. PubMed ID: 24129904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The roles of positive and negative selection in the molecular evolution of insect endosymbionts.
Fry AJ; Wernegreen JJ
Gene; 2005 Aug; 355():1-10. PubMed ID: 16039807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detecting Adaptation in Protein-Coding Genes Using a Bayesian Site-Heterogeneous Mutation-Selection Codon Substitution Model.
Rodrigue N; Lartillot N
Mol Biol Evol; 2017 Jan; 34(1):204-214. PubMed ID: 27744408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The population genetics of dN/dS.
Kryazhimskiy S; Plotkin JB
PLoS Genet; 2008 Dec; 4(12):e1000304. PubMed ID: 19081788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of Methods to Detect Shifts in Directional Selection at the Genome Scale.
Duchemin L; Lanore V; Veber P; Boussau B
Mol Biol Evol; 2023 Feb; 40(2):. PubMed ID: 36510704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A counting renaissance: combining stochastic mapping and empirical Bayes to quickly detect amino acid sites under positive selection.
Lemey P; Minin VN; Bielejec F; Kosakovsky Pond SL; Suchard MA
Bioinformatics; 2012 Dec; 28(24):3248-56. PubMed ID: 23064000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mutation-selection models of coding sequence evolution with site-heterogeneous amino acid fitness profiles.
Rodrigue N; Philippe H; Lartillot N
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2010 Mar; 107(10):4629-34. PubMed ID: 20176949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Extensively Parameterized Mutation-Selection Models Reliably Capture Site-Specific Selective Constraint.
Spielman SJ; Wilke CO
Mol Biol Evol; 2016 Nov; 33(11):2990-3002. PubMed ID: 27512115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Site-to-site variation of synonymous substitution rates.
Pond SK; Muse SV
Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Dec; 22(12):2375-85. PubMed ID: 16107593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detecting consistent patterns of directional adaptation using differential selection codon models.
Parto S; Lartillot N
BMC Evol Biol; 2017 Jun; 17(1):147. PubMed ID: 28645318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interaction between selection and biased gene conversion in mammalian protein-coding sequence evolution revealed by a phylogenetic covariance analysis.
Lartillot N
Mol Biol Evol; 2013 Feb; 30(2):356-68. PubMed ID: 23024185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Correlated Selection on Amino Acid Deletion and Replacement in Mammalian Protein Sequences.
Zheng Y; Graur D; Azevedo RBR
J Mol Evol; 2018 Jul; 86(6):365-378. PubMed ID: 29955898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Comparison of One-Rate and Two-Rate Inference Frameworks for Site-Specific dN/dS Estimation.
Spielman SJ; Wan S; Wilke CO
Genetics; 2016 Oct; 204(2):499-511. PubMed ID: 27535929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Not so different after all: a comparison of methods for detecting amino acid sites under selection.
Kosakovsky Pond SL; Frost SD
Mol Biol Evol; 2005 May; 22(5):1208-22. PubMed ID: 15703242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. dN/dS-based methods detect positive selection linked to trade-offs between different fitness traits in the coat protein of potato virus Y.
Moury B; Simon V
Mol Biol Evol; 2011 Sep; 28(9):2707-17. PubMed ID: 21498601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The site-wise log-likelihood score is a good predictor of genes under positive selection.
Wang HC; Susko E; Roger AJ
J Mol Evol; 2013 May; 76(5):280-94. PubMed ID: 23595859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Codon Usage Selection Can Bias Estimation of the Fraction of Adaptive Amino Acid Fixations.
Matsumoto T; John A; Baeza-Centurion P; Li B; Akashi H
Mol Biol Evol; 2016 Jun; 33(6):1580-9. PubMed ID: 26873577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
