285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28110357)
1. The Potential Role of Tree Diversity in Reducing Shallow Landslide Risk.
Kobayashi Y; Mori AS
Environ Manage; 2017 May; 59(5):807-815. PubMed ID: 28110357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Floristic and vegetation successional processes within landslides in a Mediterranean environment.
Neto C; Cardigos P; Oliveira SC; Zêzere JL
Sci Total Environ; 2017 Jan; 574():969-981. PubMed ID: 27668849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Ecological risk assessment of landslide disasters based on potential loss of ecosystem services].
Wang HF; Lin ZY; Xiao Y; Lu HT; Zhang W; Zhan YJ; Yan Y
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2019 Oct; 30(10):3553-3562. PubMed ID: 31621243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Strategic protection of landslide vulnerable mountains for biodiversity conservation under land-cover and climate change impacts.
Li BV; Jenkins CN; Xu W
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Jan; 119(2):. PubMed ID: 34983877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of climate change and canopy disturbances on landslide susceptibility in headwater catchments.
Scheidl C; Heiser M; Kamper S; Thaler T; Klebinder K; Nagl F; Lechner V; Markart G; Rammer W; Seidl R
Sci Total Environ; 2020 Nov; 742():140588. PubMed ID: 32629267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Land use change and landslide characteristics analysis for community-based disaster mitigation.
Chen CY; Huang WL
Environ Monit Assess; 2013 May; 185(5):4125-39. PubMed ID: 22961329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Integration of Vulnerability and Hazard Factors for Landslide Risk Assessment.
Arrogante-Funes P; Bruzón AG; Arrogante-Funes F; Ramos-Bernal RN; Vázquez-Jiménez R
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Nov; 18(22):. PubMed ID: 34831741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Catchment-scale impacts of shallow landslides on stream water chemistry.
Yoshihara N; Matsumoto S; Umezawa R; Machida I
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Jun; 825():153970. PubMed ID: 35183625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Relations of landslide and debris flow hazards to environmental factors].
Zhang GP; Xu J; Bi BG
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2009 Mar; 20(3):653-8. PubMed ID: 19637606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Zonation of Landslide Susceptibility in Ruijin, Jiangxi, China.
Zhou X; Wu W; Lin Z; Zhang G; Chen R; Song Y; Wang Z; Lang T; Qin Y; Ou P; Huangfu W; Zhang Y; Xie L; Huang X; Fu X; Li J; Jiang J; Zhang M; Liu Y; Peng S; Shao C; Bai Y; Zhang X; Liu X; Liu W
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 May; 18(11):. PubMed ID: 34072874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantifying the influence of individual trees on slope stability at landscape scale.
Spiekermann RI; McColl S; Fuller I; Dymond J; Burkitt L; Smith HG
J Environ Manage; 2021 May; 286():112194. PubMed ID: 33652255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimal Subdivision for Treatment and Management of Catastrophic Landslides in a Watershed Using Topographic Factors.
Lin CY; Fu KL; Lin CY
Environ Manage; 2016 Nov; 58(5):833-842. PubMed ID: 27605227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Changes in the factors contributing to the reduction of landslide fatalities between 1945 and 2019 in Japan.
Shinohara Y; Kume T
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Jun; 827():154392. PubMed ID: 35276158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Understanding complex slope deformation through tree-ring analyses.
Šilhán K; Tichavský R; Fabiánová A; Chalupa V; Chalupová O; Škarpich V; Tolasz R
Sci Total Environ; 2019 May; 665():1083-1094. PubMed ID: 30893740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The age-dependent sensitivity of Picea abies (L.) H. Karst. to landslide movements.
Šilhán K
Sci Total Environ; 2021 Jul; 776():145933. PubMed ID: 33647661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Landslide Susceptibility Assessment Using Spatial Multi-Criteria Evaluation Model in Rwanda.
Nsengiyumva JB; Luo G; Nahayo L; Huang X; Cai P
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Jan; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 29385096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of influences of forest cover change on landslides by comparing rainfall-induced landslides in Japanese artificial forests with different ages.
Sato T; Katsuki Y; Shuin Y
Sci Rep; 2023 Aug; 13(1):14258. PubMed ID: 37653004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ecosystem changes following the 2016 Kumamoto earthquakes in Japan: Future perspectives.
Sidle RC; Gomi T; Akasaka M; Koyanagi K
Ambio; 2018 Oct; 47(6):721-734. PubMed ID: 29288415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Shallow Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: A Comparison between Logistic Model Tree, Logistic Regression, Naïve Bayes Tree, Artificial Neural Network, and Support Vector Machine Algorithms.
Nhu VH; Shirzadi A; Shahabi H; Singh SK; Al-Ansari N; Clague JJ; Jaafari A; Chen W; Miraki S; Dou J; Luu C; Górski K; Thai Pham B; Nguyen HD; Ahmad BB
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Apr; 17(8):. PubMed ID: 32316191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Woody plant richness does not influence invertebrate community reassembly trajectories in a tree diversity experiment.
Yeeles P; Lach L; Hobbs RJ; van Wees M; Didham RK
Ecology; 2017 Feb; 98(2):500-511. PubMed ID: 27864933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
