114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28110502)
1. Accuracy and Reproducibility of Nuclear/Cytoplasmic Ratio Assessments in Urinary Cytology Specimens.
Layfield LJ; Esebua M; Frazier SR; Hammer RD; Bivin WW; Nguyen V; Ersoy I; Schmidt RL
Diagn Cytopathol; 2017 Feb; 45(2):107-112. PubMed ID: 28110502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Digital image analysis supports a nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratio cutoff value of 0.5 for atypical urothelial cells.
Hang JF; Charu V; Zhang ML; VandenBussche CJ
Cancer Cytopathol; 2017 Sep; 125(9):710-716. PubMed ID: 28581671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An ancillary method in urine cytology: Nucleolar/nuclear volume ratio for discrimination between benign and malignant urothelial cells.
Tone K; Kojima K; Hoshiai K; Kumagai N; Kijima H; Kurose A
Diagn Cytopathol; 2016 Jun; 44(6):483-91. PubMed ID: 26972810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Increased risk of malignancy for non-atypical urothelial cell groups compared to negative cytology in voided urine. Morphological changes with LBC.
Granados R; Butrón M; Santonja C; Rodríguez JM; Martín A; Duarte J; Camarmo E; Corrales T; Aramburu JA
Diagn Cytopathol; 2016 Jul; 44(7):582-90. PubMed ID: 27089849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of grading of urothelial carcinoma on urine cytology: an analysis of interobserver and intraobserver agreement.
Reid MD; Osunkoya AO; Siddiqui MT; Looney SW
Int J Clin Exp Pathol; 2012; 5(9):882-91. PubMed ID: 23119105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Young investigator challenge: The accuracy of the nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratio estimation among trained morphologists.
Vaickus LJ; Tambouret RH
Cancer Cytopathol; 2015 Sep; 123(9):524-30. PubMed ID: 26375883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Split-sample comparison of urothelial cells in ThinPrep and cytospin preparations in urinary cytology: Do we need to adjust The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology criteria?
Richardson CJ; Pambuccian SE; Barkan GA
Cancer Cytopathol; 2020 Feb; 128(2):119-125. PubMed ID: 31774630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of the Cytomorphological Features in Atypical Urine Specimens following Application of The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology.
Glass R; Rosen L; Chau K; Sheikh-Fayyaz S; Farmer P; Coutsouvelis C; Slim F; Brenkert R; Das K; Raab S; Cocker R
Acta Cytol; 2018; 62(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 29151086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Morphologists overestimate the nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratio.
Zhang ML; Guo AX; VandenBussche CJ
Cancer Cytopathol; 2016 Sep; 124(9):669-77. PubMed ID: 27159533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Applying the Paris system for reporting urine cytology to challenging cytology cases.
Glass R; Rosca O; Raab S; Szabelska J; Chau K; Sheikh-Fayyaz S; Cocker R
Diagn Cytopathol; 2019 Jul; 47(7):675-681. PubMed ID: 31017746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact of subdividing the "atypical" category for urinary cytology on patient management.
Glass R; Cocker R; Rosen L; Coutsouvelis C; Chau K; Slim F; Brenkert R; Sheikh-Fayyaz S; Farmer P; Das K
Diagn Cytopathol; 2016 Jun; 44(6):477-82. PubMed ID: 26991372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interobserver reproducibility of The Paris System of Reporting Urine Cytology on cytocentrifuged samples.
Sahai R; Rajkumar B; Joshi P; Singh A; Kumar A; Durgapal P; Gupta A; Kishore S; Chowdhury N
Diagn Cytopathol; 2020 Nov; 48(11):979-985. PubMed ID: 32543091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of vimentin immunocytochemical staining for evaluation of atypical cells in voided urine samples.
Strojan Fležar M; Srebotnik-Kirbiš I; Gutnik H
Diagn Cytopathol; 2017 Feb; 45(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 27888661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic Agreement for High-Grade Urothelial Cell Carcinoma in Atypical Urine Cytology: A Nationwide Survey Reveals a Tendency for Overestimation in Specimens with an N/C Ratio Approaching 0.5.
Wang YH; Hang JF; Wen CH; Liao KC; Lee WY; Lai CR
Cancers (Basel); 2020 Jan; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 31979119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cellular morphometry in nongynecologic thin-layer and filter cytologic specimens.
Bishop JW; Sims KL
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1998 Aug; 20(4):257-67. PubMed ID: 9739408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy and interobserver variability of the cytologic diagnosis of low-grade urothelial carcinoma in instrumented urinary tract cytology specimens.
McCroskey Z; Pambuccian SE; Kleitherms S; Antic T; Cohen MB; Barkan GA; Wojcik EM
Am J Clin Pathol; 2015 Dec; 144(6):902-8. PubMed ID: 26572997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effects of the current World Health Organization/International Society of Urologic Pathologists bladder neoplasm classification system on urine cytology results.
Curry JL; Wojcik EM
Cancer; 2002 Jun; 96(3):140-5. PubMed ID: 12115301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic classification of urothelial cells in urine cytology specimens using exclusively spectral information.
Jaganath R; Angeletti C; Levenson R; Rimm DL
Cancer; 2004 Jun; 102(3):186-91. PubMed ID: 15211478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interobserver reproducibility of The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology.
Long T; Layfield LJ; Esebua M; Frazier SR; Giorgadze DT; Schmidt RL
Cytojournal; 2017; 14():17. PubMed ID: 28828030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reliability of nucleus-to-cell and nucleus-to-cytoplasm calculations for conjunctival impression cytology specimens.
Doughty MJ
Curr Eye Res; 2012 Jul; 37(7):583-91. PubMed ID: 22574637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
