These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28110917)

  • 1. Using a marker-less method for estimating L5/S1 moments during symmetrical lifting.
    Mehrizi R; Xu X; Zhang S; Pavlovic V; Metaxas D; Li K
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Nov; 65():541-550. PubMed ID: 28110917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimating 3-D L5/S1 moments during manual lifting using a video coding system: validity and interrater reliability.
    Xu X; Chang CC; Faber GS; Kingma I; Dennerlein JT
    Hum Factors; 2012 Dec; 54(6):1053-65. PubMed ID: 23397813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Two linear regression models predicting cumulative dynamic L5/S1 joint moment during a range of lifting tasks based on static postures.
    Xu X; Chang CC; Lu ML
    Ergonomics; 2012; 55(9):1093-103. PubMed ID: 22803616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The error of L5/S1 joint moment calculation in a body-centered non-inertial reference frame when the fictitious force is ignored.
    Xu X; Faber GS; Kingma I; Chang CC; Hsiang SM
    J Biomech; 2013 Jul; 46(11):1943-7. PubMed ID: 23768468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimation of 3-D peak L5/S1 joint moment during asymmetric lifting tasks with cubic spline interpolation of segment Euler angles.
    Xu X; Chang CC; Faber GS; Kingma I; Dennerlein JT
    Appl Ergon; 2012 Jan; 43(1):115-20. PubMed ID: 21529774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimating 3D L5/S1 moments and ground reaction forces during trunk bending using a full-body ambulatory inertial motion capture system.
    Faber GS; Chang CC; Kingma I; Dennerlein JT; van Dieën JH
    J Biomech; 2016 Apr; 49(6):904-912. PubMed ID: 26795123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A computer-vision method to estimate joint angles and L5/S1 moments during lifting tasks through a single camera.
    Wang H; Xie Z; Lu L; Li L; Xu X
    J Biomech; 2021 Dec; 129():110860. PubMed ID: 34794041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing polynomial and cubic spline interpolation of segment angles for estimating L5/S1 net moment during symmetric lifting tasks.
    Xu X; Chang CC; Faber GS; Kingma I; Dennerlein JT
    J Biomech; 2010 Feb; 43(3):583-6. PubMed ID: 19880119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of snow shovel shaft configuration on lumbosacral biomechanics during a load-lifting task.
    Lewinson RT; Rouhi G; Robertson DG
    Appl Ergon; 2014 Mar; 45(2):234-8. PubMed ID: 23845725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of dynamic factors on triaxial net muscular moments at the L5/S1 joint during asymmetrical lifting and lowering.
    Gagnon D; Gagnon M
    J Biomech; 1992 Aug; 25(8):891-901. PubMed ID: 1639833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relationship between moments at the L5/S1 level, hip and knee joint when lifting.
    Schipplein OD; Trafimow JH; Andersson GB; Andriacchi TP
    J Biomech; 1990; 23(9):907-12. PubMed ID: 2211735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Motion-based prediction of external forces and moments and back loading during manual material handling tasks.
    Muller A; Pontonnier C; Robert-Lachaine X; Dumont G; Plamondon A
    Appl Ergon; 2020 Jan; 82():102935. PubMed ID: 31479837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reaction moment at the L5/S1 joint during simulated forward slipping with a handheld load.
    Liu J; Lockhart T; Kim S
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2014; 20(3):429-36. PubMed ID: 25189747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sensitivity analysis of segment models to estimate the net reaction moments at the L5/S1 joint in lifting.
    Desjardins P; Plamondon A; Gagnon M
    Med Eng Phys; 1998 Mar; 20(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 9679235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Low back load in airport baggage handlers.
    Koblauch H
    Dan Med J; 2016 Apr; 63(4):. PubMed ID: 27034189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Are psychophysically chosen lifting loads based on joint kinetics?
    Banks JJ; Caldwell GE
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Jan; 74():17-23. PubMed ID: 30487096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dynamic versus static analyses of lifting a box from the floor.
    Menzer HM; Reiser RF
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2005; 41():305-10. PubMed ID: 15850123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A computer vision based method for 3D posture estimation of symmetrical lifting.
    Mehrizi R; Peng X; Xu X; Zhang S; Metaxas D; Li K
    J Biomech; 2018 Mar; 69():40-46. PubMed ID: 29398001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sex-based differences in lifting technique under increasing load conditions: A principal component analysis.
    Sheppard PS; Stevenson JM; Graham RB
    Appl Ergon; 2016 May; 54():186-95. PubMed ID: 26851478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical analysis of manual material handling movement in healthy weight and obese workers.
    Corbeil P; Plamondon A; Handrigan G; Vallée-Marcotte J; Laurendeau S; Ten Have J; Manzerolle N
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Jan; 74():124-133. PubMed ID: 30487091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.