1500 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28110982)
1. Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study.
Ahmed HU; El-Shater Bosaily A; Brown LC; Gabe R; Kaplan R; Parmar MK; Collaco-Moraes Y; Ward K; Hindley RG; Freeman A; Kirkham AP; Oldroyd R; Parker C; Emberton M;
Lancet; 2017 Feb; 389(10071):815-822. PubMed ID: 28110982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multiparametric MRI to improve detection of prostate cancer compared with transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy alone: the PROMIS study.
Brown LC; Ahmed HU; Faria R; El-Shater Bosaily A; Gabe R; Kaplan RS; Parmar M; Collaco-Moraes Y; Ward K; Hindley RG; Freeman A; Kirkham A; Oldroyd R; Parker C; Bott S; Burns-Cox N; Dudderidge T; Ghei M; Henderson A; Persad R; Rosario DJ; Shergill I; Winkler M; Soares M; Spackman E; Sculpher M; Emberton M
Health Technol Assess; 2018 Jul; 22(39):1-176. PubMed ID: 30040065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. PROMIS--Prostate MR imaging study: A paired validating cohort study evaluating the role of multi-parametric MRI in men with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer.
El-Shater Bosaily A; Parker C; Brown LC; Gabe R; Hindley RG; Kaplan R; Emberton M; Ahmed HU;
Contemp Clin Trials; 2015 May; 42():26-40. PubMed ID: 25749312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Can multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging predict upgrading of transrectal ultrasound biopsy results at more definitive histology?
Abd-Alazeez M; Ahmed HU; Arya M; Allen C; Dikaios N; Freeman A; Emberton M; Kirkham A
Urol Oncol; 2014 Aug; 32(6):741-7. PubMed ID: 24981993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis in Biopsy-naive Men with Suspected Prostate Cancer Based on Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen Values: Results from a Randomized Prospective Blinded Controlled Trial.
Tonttila PP; Lantto J; Pääkkö E; Piippo U; Kauppila S; Lammentausta E; Ohtonen P; Vaarala MH
Eur Urol; 2016 Mar; 69(3):419-25. PubMed ID: 26033153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-Tesla magnetic resonance-guided prostate biopsy in men with increased prostate-specific antigen and repeated, negative, random, systematic, transrectal ultrasound biopsies: detection of clinically significant prostate cancers.
Hoeks CM; Schouten MG; Bomers JG; Hoogendoorn SP; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Hambrock T; Vergunst H; Sedelaar JP; Fütterer JJ; Barentsz JO
Eur Urol; 2012 Nov; 62(5):902-9. PubMed ID: 22325447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The accuracy of multiparametric MRI in men with negative biopsy and elevated PSA level--can it rule out clinically significant prostate cancer?
Abd-Alazeez M; Ahmed HU; Arya M; Charman SC; Anastasiadis E; Freeman A; Emberton M; Kirkham A
Urol Oncol; 2014 Jan; 32(1):45.e17-22. PubMed ID: 24055430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Head-to-head Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Versus Multiparametric Prostate Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen: A Large Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study.
van der Leest M; Cornel E; Israël B; Hendriks R; Padhani AR; Hoogenboom M; Zamecnik P; Bakker D; Setiasti AY; Veltman J; van den Hout H; van der Lelij H; van Oort I; Klaver S; Debruyne F; Sedelaar M; Hannink G; Rovers M; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Barentsz JO
Eur Urol; 2019 Apr; 75(4):570-578. PubMed ID: 30477981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Early experience with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsies under visual transrectal ultrasound guidance in patients suspicious for prostate cancer undergoing repeated biopsy.
Boesen L; Noergaard N; Chabanova E; Logager V; Balslev I; Mikines K; Thomsen HS
Scand J Urol; 2015 Feb; 49(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 24922550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multiparametric ultrasound versus multiparametric MRI to diagnose prostate cancer (CADMUS): a prospective, multicentre, paired-cohort, confirmatory study.
Grey ADR; Scott R; Shah B; Acher P; Liyanage S; Pavlou M; Omar R; Chinegwundoh F; Patki P; Shah TT; Hamid S; Ghei M; Gilbert K; Campbell D; Brew-Graves C; Arumainayagam N; Chapman A; McLeavy L; Karatziou A; Alsaadi Z; Collins T; Freeman A; Eldred-Evans D; Bertoncelli-Tanaka M; Tam H; Ramachandran N; Madaan S; Winkler M; Arya M; Emberton M; Ahmed HU
Lancet Oncol; 2022 Mar; 23(3):428-438. PubMed ID: 35240084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Risk-stratification based on magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density may reduce unnecessary follow-up biopsy procedures in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.
Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Drost FH; van Leenders GJ; Bokhorst LP; Bangma CH; Schoots IG
BJU Int; 2017 Oct; 120(4):511-519. PubMed ID: 28267899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.
Boesen L
Dan Med J; 2017 Feb; 64(2):. PubMed ID: 28157066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The PICTURE study -- prostate imaging (multi-parametric MRI and Prostate HistoScanning™) compared to transperineal ultrasound guided biopsy for significant prostate cancer risk evaluation.
Simmons LA; Ahmed HU; Moore CM; Punwani S; Freeman A; Hu Y; Barratt D; Charman SC; Van der Meulen J; Emberton M
Contemp Clin Trials; 2014 Jan; 37(1):69-83. PubMed ID: 24291455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging vs. standard care in men being evaluated for prostate cancer: a randomized study.
Panebianco V; Barchetti F; Sciarra A; Ciardi A; Indino EL; Papalia R; Gallucci M; Tombolini V; Gentile V; Catalano C
Urol Oncol; 2015 Jan; 33(1):17.e1-17.e7. PubMed ID: 25443268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Why and Where do We Miss Significant Prostate Cancer with Multi-parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging followed by Magnetic Resonance-guided and Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men?
Schouten MG; van der Leest M; Pokorny M; Hoogenboom M; Barentsz JO; Thompson LC; Fütterer JJ
Eur Urol; 2017 Jun; 71(6):896-903. PubMed ID: 28063613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-Naive Men: The Biparametric MRI for Detection of Prostate Cancer (BIDOC) Study.
Boesen L; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Bisbjerg R; Thestrup KC; Winther MD; Jakobsen H; Thomsen HS
JAMA Netw Open; 2018 Jun; 1(2):e180219. PubMed ID: 30646066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Decision analysis model comparing cost of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging vs. repeat biopsy for detection of prostate cancer in men with prior negative findings on biopsy.
Lotan Y; Haddad AQ; Costa DN; Pedrosa I; Rofsky NM; Roehrborn CG
Urol Oncol; 2015 Jun; 33(6):266.e9-16. PubMed ID: 25858102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Trans-rectal ultrasound visibility of prostate lesions identified by magnetic resonance imaging increases accuracy of image-fusion targeted biopsies.
Ukimura O; Marien A; Palmer S; Villers A; Aron M; de Castro Abreu AL; Leslie S; Shoji S; Matsugasumi T; Gross M; Dasgupta P; Gill IS
World J Urol; 2015 Nov; 33(11):1669-76. PubMed ID: 25656687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance spectroscopy and enhanced magnetic resonance imaging techniques in aiding the localisation of prostate abnormalities for biopsy: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
Mowatt G; Scotland G; Boachie C; Cruickshank M; Ford JA; Fraser C; Kurban L; Lam TB; Padhani AR; Royle J; Scheenen TW; Tassie E
Health Technol Assess; 2013 May; 17(20):vii-xix, 1-281. PubMed ID: 23697373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Standardized Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reporting Using the Prostate Cancer Radiological Estimation of Change in Sequential Evaluation Criteria and Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion with Transperineal Saturation Biopsy to Select Men on Active Surveillance.
Dieffenbacher S; Nyarangi-Dix J; Giganti F; Bonekamp D; Kesch C; Müller-Wolf MB; Schütz V; Gasch C; Hatiboglu G; Hauffe M; Stenzinger A; Duensing S; Schlemmer HP; Moore CM; Hohenfellner M; Radtke JP
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Jan; 7(1):102-110. PubMed ID: 30878348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
