455 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28111130)
1. Added Value of Breast MRI for Preoperative Diagnosis of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Diagnostic Performance on 362 Patients.
Petrillo A; Fusco R; Petrillo M; Triunfo F; Filice S; Vallone P; Setola SV; Rubulotta M; Di Bonito M; Rinaldo M; D'Aiuto M; Brunetti A
Clin Breast Cancer; 2017 Jun; 17(3):e127-e134. PubMed ID: 28111130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) useful for diagnosis of additional sites of disease in patients recently diagnosed with pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)?
Benveniste AP; Ortiz-Perez T; Ebuoma LO; Sepulveda KA; Severs FJ; Roark A; Wang T; Sedgwick EL
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Nov; 96():74-79. PubMed ID: 29103479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ductal carcinoma in situ: is there a role for MRI?
Zuiani C; Francescutti GE; Londero V; Zunnui I; Bazzocchi M
J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2002 Sep; 21(3 Suppl):89-95. PubMed ID: 12585661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficacy of breast MRI for surgical decision in patients with breast cancer: ductal carcinoma in situ versus invasive ductal carcinoma.
Lee J; Jung JH; Kim WW; Park CS; Lee RK; Kim HJ; Kim WH; Park HY
BMC Cancer; 2020 Sep; 20(1):934. PubMed ID: 32993586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of Preoperative Breast MR Imaging and MR-guided Surgery on Diagnosis and Surgical Outcome of Women with Invasive Breast Cancer with and without DCIS Component.
Kuhl CK; Strobel K; Bieling H; Wardelmann E; Kuhn W; Maass N; Schrading S
Radiology; 2017 Sep; 284(3):645-655. PubMed ID: 28445683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Breast MRI of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: sensitivity of diagnosis and influence of lesion characteristics.
Baur A; Bahrs SD; Speck S; Wietek BM; Krämer B; Vogel U; Claussen CD; Siegmann-Luz KC
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Oct; 82(10):1731-7. PubMed ID: 23743052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [MRI outstands mammogram in sensitivity of breast ductal carcinoma in situ:an analysis of 122 cases].
Yu QX; Chen XS; Wu JY; Han BS; He JR; Zhu L; Chen WG; Li YF; Tan L; Chai WM; Wang DB; Fei XC; Yuan F; Jin XL; Shen KW; Li HW
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Jan; 51(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 23578423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predictors of invasive disease in patients preoperatively diagnosed with ductal carcinoma without stromal invasion, with breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound (US).
Maeda H; Hayashida T; Watanuki R; Kikuchi M; Nakashoji A; Yokoe T; Seki T; Takahashi M; Kitagawa Y
Breast Cancer; 2021 Mar; 28(2):398-404. PubMed ID: 33200381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: comparison of diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis, digital mammography, and ultrasonography.
Su X; Lin Q; Cui C; Xu W; Wei Z; Fei J; Li L
Breast Cancer; 2017 Jul; 24(4):562-570. PubMed ID: 27837442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of MRI on high grade Ductal Carcinoma Insitu (HG DCIS) management, are we using the full scope of MRI?
Hajaj M; Karim A; Pascaline S; Noor L; Patel S; Dakka M
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Oct; 95():271-277. PubMed ID: 28987679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The diagnostic sensitivity of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and breast-specific gamma imaging in women with calcified and non-calcified DCIS.
Kim JS; Lee SM; Cha ES
Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):668-75. PubMed ID: 24043881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predictive values of BI-RADS(®) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the detection of breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).
Badan GM; Piato S; Roveda D; de Faria Castro Fleury E
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 85(10):1701-1707. PubMed ID: 27666605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Application of magnetic resonance computer-aided diagnosis for preoperatively determining invasive disease in ultrasonography-guided core needle biopsy-proven ductal carcinoma in situ.
Ahn HS; Kim SM; Kim MS; Jang M; Yun B; Kang E; Kim EK; Park SY; Kim B
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Jul; 99(31):e21257. PubMed ID: 32756104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of breast MRI in women eligible for breast conservation surgery and intra-operative radiation therapy.
Paudel N; Bethke KP; Wang LC; Strauss JB; Hayes JP; Donnelly ED
Surg Oncol; 2018 Mar; 27(1):95-99. PubMed ID: 29549911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Histogram analysis of volume-based apparent diffusion coefficient in breast cancer.
Park GE; Kim SH; Kim EJ; Kang BJ; Park MS
Acta Radiol; 2017 Nov; 58(11):1294-1302. PubMed ID: 28273747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ with mammography, breast specific gamma imaging, and magnetic resonance imaging: a comparative study.
Brem RF; Fishman M; Rapelyea JA
Acad Radiol; 2007 Aug; 14(8):945-50. PubMed ID: 17659240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Role of preoperative breast MRI in ductal carcinoma in situ for prediction of the presence and assessment of the extent of occult invasive component.
Nori J; Meattini I; Giannotti E; Abdulcadir D; Mariscotti G; Calabrese M; Angelino F; Chiesa F; Saieva C; Vanzi E; Boeri C; Bianchi S; Sanchez L; Orzalesi L; Casella D; Susini T; Livi L
Breast J; 2014; 20(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 24750509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Preoperative prediction of the size of pure ductal carcinoma in situ using three imaging modalities as compared to histopathological size: does magnetic resonance imaging add value?
Daniel OK; Lim SM; Kim JH; Park HS; Park S; Kim SI
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Jul; 164(2):437-444. PubMed ID: 28439735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Preoperative clinicopathologic factors and breast magnetic resonance imaging features can predict ductal carcinoma in situ with invasive components.
Lee CW; Wu HK; Lai HW; Wu WP; Chen ST; Chen DR; Chen CJ; Kuo SJ
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Apr; 85(4):780-9. PubMed ID: 26971424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predicting Upgrade of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ to Invasive Breast Cancer at Surgery With Ultrafast Imaging.
Miceli R; Gao Y; Qian K; Heller SL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Jul; 221(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 36752370
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
