210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28111155)
1. The effects of different restorative materials on the detection of approximal caries in cone-beam computed tomography scans with and without metal artifact reduction mode.
Cebe F; Aktan AM; Ozsevik AS; Ciftci ME; Surmelioglu HD
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2017 Mar; 123(3):392-400. PubMed ID: 28111155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The impact of different dental restorations on detection of proximal caries by cone beam computed tomography.
Abu El-Ela WH; Farid MM; Abou El-Fotouh M
Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Mar; 26(3):2413-2420. PubMed ID: 34601634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic accuracy of different display types in detection of recurrent caries under restorations by using CBCT.
Baltacıoĝlu İH; Eren H; Yavuz Y; Kamburoğlu K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(6):20160099. PubMed ID: 27319604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detection accuracy of in vitro approximal caries by cone beam computed tomography images.
Qu X; Li G; Zhang Z; Ma X
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Aug; 79(2):e24-7. PubMed ID: 20185260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of Amalgam Restorations and Operation Parameters on Diagnostic Accuracy of Caries Detection Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography: An In Vitro Study.
Mehanny M; AlMohareb RA; Noujeim M
Scanning; 2021; 2021():2679012. PubMed ID: 34484553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An in vitro comparison of diagnostic abilities of conventional radiography, storage phosphor, and cone beam computed tomography to determine occlusal and approximal caries.
Kayipmaz S; Sezgin ÖS; Saricaoğlu ST; Çan G
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):478-82. PubMed ID: 20934291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of Different Contact Materials on Approximal Caries Detection by Laser Fluorescence and Light-Emitting Diode Devices.
Ozsevik AS; Kararslan ES; Aktan AM; Bozdemir E; Cebe F; Sarı F
Photomed Laser Surg; 2015 Oct; 33(10):492-7. PubMed ID: 26352346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Quantitative assessment on artifacts of dental restorative materials in cone beam computed tomography].
Yuan FS; Sun YC; Xie XY; Wang Y; Lv PJ
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2013 Dec; 45(6):989-92. PubMed ID: 24343088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of cone beam computed tomography and digital intraoral radiography performance in the detection of artificially induced recurrent caries-like lesions.
Sousa Melo SL; Belem MDF; Prieto LT; Tabchoury CPM; Haiter-Neto F
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2017 Sep; 124(3):306-314. PubMed ID: 28690085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography scans compared with intraoral image modalities for detection of caries lesions.
Haiter-Neto F; Wenzel A; Gotfredsen E
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jan; 37(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 18195250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparative study of the diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography and intraoral radiographic modalities for the detection of noncavitated caries.
Krzyżostaniak J; Kulczyk T; Czarnecka B; Surdacka A
Clin Oral Investig; 2015 Apr; 19(3):667-72. PubMed ID: 25059712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of accuracy cone-beam computed tomography and digital bitewing radiography for detection of recurrent caries under various restorative materials: in vitro study.
Talachi F; Abesi F; Ezoji F; Mahjoub S; Ghorbani H; Bijani A
Oral Radiol; 2023 Oct; 39(4):722-730. PubMed ID: 37335388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Intraoral Radiography in Detection of Recurrent Caries under Composite Restorations.
Kasraei S; Shokri A; Poorolajal J; Khajeh S; Rahmani H
Braz Dent J; 2017; 28(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 28301024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Restorative treatment decisions on approximal caries in Norway.
Tveit AB; Espelid I; Skodje F
Int Dent J; 1999 Jun; 49(3):165-72. PubMed ID: 10858750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating the effects of orthodontic materials, field of view, and artifact reduction mode on accuracy of CBCT-based caries detection.
Isman O; Aktan AM; Ertas ET
Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Jul; 24(7):2487-2496. PubMed ID: 31811495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of CBCT and intraoral radiography for proximal caries detection in the presence of different dental restoration materials.
Mosavat F; Ahmadi E; Amirfarhangi S; Rafeie N
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Jun; 23(1):419. PubMed ID: 37353807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Enamel remineralization on teeth adjacent to Class II glass ionomer restorations.
Segura A; Donly KJ; Stratmann RG
Am J Dent; 1997 Oct; 10(5):247-50. PubMed ID: 9522700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of amalgam fillings on the detection of approximal caries by cone beam CT: in vitro study.
Kulczyk T; Dyszkiewicz Konwińska M; Owecka M; Krzyżostaniak J; Surdacka A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2014; 43(7):20130342. PubMed ID: 24986630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Visibility of artificial buccal recurrent caries under restorations using different radiographic techniques.
Murat S; Kamburoğlu K; Isayev A; Kurşun S; Yüksel S
Oper Dent; 2013; 38(2):197-207. PubMed ID: 22917443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Longevity of extensive class II open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement.
van Dijken JW; Kieri C; Carlén M
J Dent Res; 1999 Jul; 78(7):1319-25. PubMed ID: 10403459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
