210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28111155)
41. Assessment of furcal perforations in the vicinity of different root canal sealers using a cone beam computed tomography system with and without the application of artifact reduction mode: an ex vivo investigation on extracted human teeth.
Kamburoğlu K; Yılmaz F; Yeta EN; Özen D
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2016 Jun; 121(6):657-65. PubMed ID: 27039007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Transient thermal and stress analysis of maxillary second premolar tooth using an exact three-dimensional model.
Hashemipour MA; Mohammadpour A; Nassab SA
Indian J Dent Res; 2010; 21(2):158-64. PubMed ID: 20657080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial.
Banomyong D; Harnirattisai C; Burrow MF
J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement.
Palacios RP; Johnson GH; Phillips KM; Raigrodski AJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):104-14. PubMed ID: 16911887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Possibilities of modern x-ray examination methods for diagnostics of hidden dental caries of approximal localization.
Sokolova II; German SI; Tomilina TV; Slynko YO; Potapchuk AM; Skydan KV; Udovychenko NM
Wiad Lek; 2019; 72(7):1258-1264. PubMed ID: 31398152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Evaluation of the efficacy of the metal artifact reduction algorithm in the detection of a vertical root fracture in endodontically treated teeth in cone-beam computed tomography images: An in vitro study.
Saati S; Eskandarloo A; Falahi A; Tapak L; Hekmat B
Dent Med Probl; 2019; 56(4):357-363. PubMed ID: 31895500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Histological validation of cone-beam computed tomography versus laser fluorescence and conventional diagnostic methods for occlusal caries detection.
Ozturk E; Sinanoglu A
Photomed Laser Surg; 2015 Feb; 33(2):61-8. PubMed ID: 25650901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Alternative methods to visual and radiographic examinations for approximal caries detection.
Abogazalah N; Ando M
J Oral Sci; 2017 Sep; 59(3):315-322. PubMed ID: 28529280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Fluid flow after resin-composite restoration in extracted carious teeth.
Banomyong D; Palamara JE; Messer HH; Burrow MF
Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun; 117(3):334-42. PubMed ID: 19583764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Potential impact of metal crowns at varying distances from a carious lesion on its detection on cone-beam computed tomography scans with several protocols.
Barros-Costa M; Nascimento EHL; Correia-Dantas IF; Oliveira ML; Freitas DQ
Imaging Sci Dent; 2024 Mar; 54(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 38571773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Ex vivo evaluation of new 2D and 3D dental radiographic technology for detecting caries.
Gaalaas L; Tyndall D; Mol A; Everett ET; Bangdiwala A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(3):20150281. PubMed ID: 26670605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Detection of cavitated approximal surfaces using cone beam CT and intraoral receptors.
Wenzel A; Hirsch E; Christensen J; Matzen LH; Scaf G; Frydenberg M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(1):39458105. PubMed ID: 22842638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Fracture load of composite resin and feldspathic all-ceramic CAD/CAM crowns.
Attia A; Abdelaziz KM; Freitag S; Kern M
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Feb; 95(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 16473085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Discrimination between restorative dental materials by their radiopacity measured in film radiographs and digital images.
Wenzel A; Hintze H; Hørsted-Bindslev P
J Forensic Odontostomatol; 1998 Jun; 16(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 9922755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Clinical Evaluation of Restorative Materials in Primary Teeth Class II Lesions.
Sengul F; Gurbuz T
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2015; 39(4):315-21. PubMed ID: 26161601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Clinical evaluation of four different dental restorative materials: one-year results.
Daou MH; Tavernier B; Meyer JM
Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2008; 118(4):290-5. PubMed ID: 18491670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Dental repair material: a resin-modified glass-ionomer bioactive ionic resin-based composite.
Croll TP; Berg JH; Donly KJ
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2015 Jan; 36(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 25822408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Is it possible to diagnose caries under fixed partial dentures with cone beam computed tomography?
Aglarci OS; Bilgin MS; Erdem A; Ertas ET
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2015 May; 119(5):579-83. PubMed ID: 25864819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength and microleakage of tricalcium silicate-based restorative material and radioopaque posterior glass ionomer restorative cement in primary and permanent teeth: an in vitro study.
Raju VG; Venumbaka NR; Mungara J; Vijayakumar P; Rajendran S; Elangovan A
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2014; 32(4):304-10. PubMed ID: 25231038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. The detection accuracies for proximal caries by cone-beam computerized tomography, film, and phosphor plates.
Zhang ZL; Qu XM; Li G; Zhang ZY; Ma XC
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Jan; 111(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 20952219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
