190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28113312)
1. Microbubble Composition and Preparation for High-Frequency Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging: In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation.
Daeichin V; van Rooij T; Skachkov I; Ergin B; Specht PA; Lima A; Ince C; Bosch JG; van der Steen AF; de Jong N; Kooiman K
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2017 Mar; 64(3):555-567. PubMed ID: 28113312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Non-linear response and viscoelastic properties of lipid-coated microbubbles: DSPC versus DPPC.
van Rooij T; Luan Y; Renaud G; van der Steen AF; Versluis M; de Jong N; Kooiman K
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 May; 41(5):1432-45. PubMed ID: 25724308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Vibrational Responses of Bound and Nonbound Targeted Lipid-Coated Single Microbubbles.
van Rooij T; Beekers I; Lattwein KR; van der Steen AFW; de Jong N; Kooiman K
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2017 May; 64(5):785-797. PubMed ID: 28287967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of PEGylation on performance of protein microbubbles and its comparison with lipid microbubbles.
Upadhyay A; Dalvi SV; Gupta G; Khanna N
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2017 Feb; 71():425-430. PubMed ID: 27987726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of shell properties on high-frequency ultrasound imaging and drug delivery using polymer-shelled microbubbles.
Chitnis PV; Koppolu S; Mamou J; Chlon C; Ketterling JA
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2013 Jan; 60(1):53-64. PubMed ID: 23287913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Modifying the size distribution of microbubble contrast agents for high-frequency subharmonic imaging.
Shekhar H; Rychak JJ; Doyley MM
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):082903. PubMed ID: 23927358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. 20 years of ultrasound contrast agent modeling.
Faez T; Emmer M; Kooiman K; Versluis M; van der Steen A; de Jong N
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2013 Jan; 60(1):7-20. PubMed ID: 23287909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of nesting shell size on brightness longevity and resistance to ultrasound-induced dissolution during enhanced B-mode contrast imaging.
Wallace N; Dicker S; Lewin P; Wrenn SP
Ultrasonics; 2014 Dec; 54(8):2099-108. PubMed ID: 25041980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nonlinear Imaging of Microbubble Contrast Agent Using the Volterra Filter: In Vivo Results.
Du J; Liu D; Ebbini ES
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2016 Dec; 63(12):2069-2081. PubMed ID: 27705855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Formation of Microbubbles for Targeted Ultrasound Contrast Imaging: Practical Translation Considerations.
Unnikrishnan S; Du Z; Diakova GB; Klibanov AL
Langmuir; 2019 Aug; 35(31):10034-10041. PubMed ID: 30509068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ligand Distribution and Lipid Phase Behavior in Phospholipid-Coated Microbubbles and Monolayers.
Langeveld SAG; Schwieger C; Beekers I; Blaffert J; van Rooij T; Blume A; Kooiman K
Langmuir; 2020 Mar; 36(12):3221-3233. PubMed ID: 32109064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of Bubble Concentration on the in Vitro and in Vivo Performance of Highly Stable Lipid Shell-Stabilized Micro- and Nanoscale Ultrasound Contrast Agents.
Abenojar EC; Nittayacharn P; de Leon AC; Perera R; Wang Y; Bederman I; Exner AA
Langmuir; 2019 Aug; 35(31):10192-10202. PubMed ID: 30913884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Optimisation of the transmit beam parameters for generation of subharmonic signals in native and altered populations of a commercial microbubble contrast agent SonoVue®.
Ivory AM; Meaney JF; Fagan AJ; Browne JE
Phys Med; 2020 Feb; 70():176-183. PubMed ID: 32036334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nanobubbles are Non-Echogenic for Fundamental-Mode Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging.
Myers JZ; Navarro-Becerra JA; Borden MA
Bioconjug Chem; 2022 Jun; 33(6):1106-1113. PubMed ID: 35476906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Targeted Ultrasound Contrast Imaging of Tumor Vasculature With Positively Charged Microbubbles.
Diakova GB; Du Z; Klibanov AL
Invest Radiol; 2020 Nov; 55(11):736-740. PubMed ID: 32569011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Monodisperse versus Polydisperse Ultrasound Contrast Agents: In Vivo Sensitivity and safety in Rat and Pig.
Helbert A; Gaud E; Segers T; Botteron C; Frinking P; Jeannot V
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 46(12):3339-3352. PubMed ID: 33008649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stable and transient subharmonic emissions from isolated contrast agent microbubbles.
Biagi E; Breschi L; Vannacci E; Masotti L
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2007 Mar; 54(3):480-97. PubMed ID: 17375818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of temperature, needle gauge and injection rate on the size distribution, concentration and acoustic responses of ultrasound contrast agents at high frequency.
Sun C; Panagakou I; Sboros V; Butler MB; Kenwright D; Thomson AJ; Moran CM
Ultrasonics; 2016 Aug; 70():84-91. PubMed ID: 27140502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Investigating the subharmonic response of individual phospholipid encapsulated microbubbles at high frequencies: a comparative study of five agents.
Helfield BL; Cherin E; Foster FS; Goertz DE
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2012 May; 38(5):846-63. PubMed ID: 22402024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ultrasonic characterization of ultrasound contrast agents.
de Jong N; Emmer M; van Wamel A; Versluis M
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2009 Aug; 47(8):861-73. PubMed ID: 19468770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
