These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28113482)

  • 1. Fall Risk Assessment Through Automatic Combination of Clinical Fall Risk Factors and Body-Worn Sensor Data.
    Greene BR; Redmond SJ; Caulfield B
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2017 May; 21(3):725-731. PubMed ID: 28113482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development and validation of a robotic multifactorial fall-risk predictive model: A one-year prospective study in community-dwelling older adults.
    Cella A; De Luca A; Squeri V; Parodi S; Vallone F; Giorgeschi A; Senesi B; Zigoura E; Quispe Guerrero KL; Siri G; De Michieli L; Saglia J; Sanfilippo C; Pilotto A
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0234904. PubMed ID: 32584912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Classification of frailty and falls history using a combination of sensor-based mobility assessments.
    Greene BR; Doheny EP; Kenny RA; Caulfield B
    Physiol Meas; 2014 Oct; 35(10):2053-66. PubMed ID: 25237821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of falls risk in community-dwelling older adults using body-worn sensors.
    Greene BR; Doheny EP; Walsh C; Cunningham C; Crosby L; Kenny RA
    Gerontology; 2012; 58(5):472-80. PubMed ID: 22571883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Determining Risk of Falls in Community Dwelling Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Using Posttest Probability.
    Lusardi MM; Fritz S; Middleton A; Allison L; Wingood M; Phillips E; Criss M; Verma S; Osborne J; Chui KK
    J Geriatr Phys Ther; 2017; 40(1):1-36. PubMed ID: 27537070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sensor-based fall risk assessment--an expert 'to go'.
    Marschollek M; Rehwald A; Wolf KH; Gietzelt M; Nemitz G; Meyer Zu Schwabedissen H; Haux R
    Methods Inf Med; 2011; 50(5):420-6. PubMed ID: 21206963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationships Between Performance on Assessments of Executive Function and Fall Risk Screening Measures in Community-Dwelling Older Adults.
    Blackwood J; Shubert T; Forgarty K; Chase C
    J Geriatr Phys Ther; 2016; 39(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 26050194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of clinical and impairment-based tests to predict falls by community-dwelling older adults.
    Boulgarides LK; McGinty SM; Willett JA; Barnes CW
    Phys Ther; 2003 Apr; 83(4):328-39. PubMed ID: 12665404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sensors vs. experts - a performance comparison of sensor-based fall risk assessment vs. conventional assessment in a sample of geriatric patients.
    Marschollek M; Rehwald A; Wolf KH; Gietzelt M; Nemitz G; zu Schwabedissen HM; Schulze M
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2011 Jun; 11():48. PubMed ID: 21711504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Falls risk assessment, multitargeted interventions and the impact on hospital falls.
    McFarlane-Kolb H
    Int J Nurs Pract; 2004 Oct; 10(5):199-206. PubMed ID: 15461689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Frailty status can be accurately assessed using inertial sensors and the TUG test.
    Greene BR; Doheny EP; O'Halloran A; Anne Kenny R
    Age Ageing; 2014 May; 43(3):406-11. PubMed ID: 24212918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Aachen Mobility and Balance Index to measure physiological falls risk: a comparison with the Tinetti POMA Scale.
    Knobe M; Giesen M; Plate S; Gradl-Dietsch G; Buecking B; Eschbach D; van Laack W; Pape HC
    Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg; 2016 Oct; 42(5):537-545. PubMed ID: 27287271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identifying Balance Measures Most Likely to Identify Recent Falls.
    Criter RE; Honaker JA
    J Geriatr Phys Ther; 2016; 39(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 25695467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Artificial neural network and falls in community-dwellers: a new approach to identify the risk of recurrent falling?
    Kabeshova A; Launay CP; Gromov VA; Annweiler C; Fantino B; Beauchet O
    J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2015 Apr; 16(4):277-81. PubMed ID: 25444572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantitative falls risk assessment using the timed up and go test.
    Greene BR; O'Donovan A; Romero-Ortuno R; Cogan L; Scanaill CN; Kenny RA
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2010 Dec; 57(12):2918-26. PubMed ID: 20923729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sensitivity of sensor-based sit-to-stand peak power to the effects of training leg strength, leg power and balance in older adults.
    Regterschot GR; Folkersma M; Zhang W; Baldus H; Stevens M; Zijlstra W
    Gait Posture; 2014; 39(1):303-7. PubMed ID: 23973356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving nursing students' assessment of fall risk in community-dwelling older adults.
    Patton SK
    Gerontol Geriatr Educ; 2018; 39(4):507-520. PubMed ID: 27935435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. FRAT-up, a Web-based fall-risk assessment tool for elderly people living in the community.
    Cattelani L; Palumbo P; Palmerini L; Bandinelli S; Becker C; Chesani F; Chiari L
    J Med Internet Res; 2015 Feb; 17(2):e41. PubMed ID: 25693419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A measure of fall risk behaviors and perceptions among community-dwelling older adults.
    Yuen HK; Carter RE
    J Allied Health; 2006; 35(4):e276-97. PubMed ID: 19759976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of a multifactorial fall prevention program on fall incidence and physical function in community-dwelling older adults with risk of falls.
    Lee HC; Chang KC; Tsauo JY; Hung JW; Huang YC; Lin SI;
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2013 Apr; 94(4):606-15, 615.e1. PubMed ID: 23220343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.