BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28114109)

  • 1. Methods for calculating the electrode position Jacobian for impedance imaging.
    Boyle A; Crabb MG; Jehl M; Lionheart WR; Adler A
    Physiol Meas; 2017 Mar; 38(3):555-574. PubMed ID: 28114109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lobe based image reconstruction in Electrical Impedance Tomography.
    Schullcke B; Gong B; Krueger-Ziolek S; Tawhai M; Adler A; Mueller-Lisse U; Moeller K
    Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):426-436. PubMed ID: 28121374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Imaging of conductivity changes and electrode movement in EIT.
    Soleimani M; Gómez-Laberge C; Adler A
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S103-13. PubMed ID: 16636402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tracking boundary movement and exterior shape modelling in lung EIT imaging.
    Biguri A; Grychtol B; Adler A; Soleimani M
    Physiol Meas; 2015 Jun; 36(6):1119-35. PubMed ID: 26007150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correction of electrode modelling errors in multi-frequency EIT imaging.
    Jehl M; Holder D
    Physiol Meas; 2016 Jun; 37(6):893-903. PubMed ID: 27206237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Correcting electrode modelling errors in EIT on realistic 3D head models.
    Jehl M; Avery J; Malone E; Holder D; Betcke T
    Physiol Meas; 2015 Dec; 36(12):2423-42. PubMed ID: 26502162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Shape deformation in two-dimensional electrical impedance tomography.
    Boyle A; Adler A; Lionheart WR
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2012 Dec; 31(12):2185-93. PubMed ID: 22711769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of electrode area, contact impedance and boundary shape on EIT images.
    Boyle A; Adler A
    Physiol Meas; 2011 Jul; 32(7):745-54. PubMed ID: 21646710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reconstruction of conductivity changes and electrode movements based on EIT temporal sequences.
    Dai T; Gómez-Laberge C; Adler A
    Physiol Meas; 2008 Jun; 29(6):S77-88. PubMed ID: 18544802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The complete electrode model for imaging and electrode contact compensation in electrical impedance tomography.
    Boverman G; Kim BS; Isaacson D; Newell JC
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():3462-5. PubMed ID: 18002742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electrical Impedance Tomography: Tissue Properties to Image Measures.
    Adler A; Boyle A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 Nov; 64(11):2494-2504. PubMed ID: 28715324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of different stimulation and measurement patterns based on internal electrode: application in cardiac impedance tomography.
    Nasehi Tehrani J; Oh TI; Jin C; Thiagalingam A; McEwan A
    Comput Biol Med; 2012 Nov; 42(11):1122-32. PubMed ID: 23017828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using compound electrodes in electrical impedance tomography.
    Hua P; Woo EJ; Webster JG; Tompkins WJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 Jan; 40(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 8468073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Realistic 2D human thorax modelling for EIT.
    Borsic A; McLeod C; Lionheart W; Kerrouche N
    Physiol Meas; 2001 Feb; 22(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 11236892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electrical impedance tomography problem with inaccurately known boundary and contact impedances.
    Kolehmainen V; Lassas M; Ola P
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2008 Oct; 27(10):1404-14. PubMed ID: 18815092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accounting for hardware imperfections in EIT image reconstruction algorithms.
    Hartinger AE; Gagnon H; Guardo R
    Physiol Meas; 2007 Jul; 28(7):S13-27. PubMed ID: 17664631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The ACE1 thoracic Electrical Impedance Tomography system for ventilation and perfusion.
    Mellenthin MM; Mueller JL; Bueno de Camargo ED; Silva de Moura F; Hamilton SJ; Gonzalez Lima R
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015; 2015():4073-6. PubMed ID: 26737189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Current approaches to analogue instrumentation design in electrical impedance tomography.
    Boone KG; Holder DS
    Physiol Meas; 1996 Nov; 17(4):229-47. PubMed ID: 8953622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of errors in static electrical impedance tomography with adjacent and trigonometric current patterns.
    Kolehmainen V; Vauhkonen M; Karjalainen PA; Kaipio JP
    Physiol Meas; 1997 Nov; 18(4):289-303. PubMed ID: 9413863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Direct EIT Jacobian calculations for conductivity change and electrode movement.
    Gómez-Laberge C; Adler A
    Physiol Meas; 2008 Jun; 29(6):S89-99. PubMed ID: 18544810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.