These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2811464)

  • 1. New Jersey's "Granny Doe" squad: arguments about mechanisms for protection of vulnerable patients.
    Price DM; Armstrong PW
    Law Med Health Care; 1989; 17(3):255-63. PubMed ID: 2811464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of the Supreme Court of New Jersey's decision in the Claire Conroy case.
    Nevins MA
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 1986 Feb; 34(2):140-3. PubMed ID: 3944404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The case of Claire Conroy: will administrative review safeguard incompetent patients?
    Lo B; Dornbrand L
    Ann Intern Med; 1986 Jun; 104(6):869-73. PubMed ID: 3085567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The antiabortion movement and Baby Jane Doe.
    Paige C; Karnofsky EB
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1986; 11(2):255-69. PubMed ID: 3745839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. State of the law: nursing homes.
    Kapp MB
    Law Med Health Care; 1990; 18(3):282-9. PubMed ID: 2232883
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reconciling Quinlan and Saikewicz: decision making for the terminally ill incompetent.
    Annas GJ
    Am J Law Med; 1979; 4(4):367-96. PubMed ID: 507056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Matter of Conroy.
    New Jersey. Supreme Court
    Atl Report; 1985 Jan; 486():1209-50. PubMed ID: 11648233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In re Peter.
    New Jersey. Supreme Court
    Atl Report; 1987 Jun; 529():419-34. PubMed ID: 11648264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Equality for the elderly incompetent: a proposal for dignified death.
    Merritt TL
    Stanford Law Rev; 1987 Feb; 39(3):689-736. PubMed ID: 10281165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Survival at what cost? Origins and effects of the modern controversy on treating severely handicapped newborns.
    Reiser SJ
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1986; 11(2):199-213. PubMed ID: 3745836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Baby Doe, Congress and the states: challenging the federal treatment standard for impaired infants.
    Newman SA
    Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(1):1-60. PubMed ID: 2764010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The 'Baby Doe' rule.
    Stevenson DK; Ariagno RL; Kutner JS; Raffin TA; Young EW
    JAMA; 1986 Apr; 255(14):1909-12. PubMed ID: 3951118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Food and water can be withheld from dying patients: the very different situations of Claire Conroy and Karen Quinlan.
    Lynn J
    Death Educ; 1984; 8(4):271-5. PubMed ID: 10310838
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Advance directives and the pursuit of death with dignity: New Jersey's new legislation.
    Cantor NL
    Rutgers Law Rev; 1992; 44(2):335-403. PubMed ID: 11651452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Moral consensus in public ethics: patient autonomy and family decision-making in the work of one state bioethics commission.
    Moskowitz EH
    J Med Philos; 1996 Apr; 21(2):149-68. PubMed ID: 8739070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Should physicians withhold life-sustaining care from patients who are not terminally ill?
    Emanuel EJ
    Lancet; 1988 Jan; 1(8577):106-8. PubMed ID: 2891943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Treatment decisions for patients without surrogates: rethinking policies for a vulnerable population.
    Miller TE; Coleman CH; Cugliari AM
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 1997 Mar; 45(3):369-74. PubMed ID: 9063286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comments and recommendations on the "Infant Doe" proposed regulations.
    Law Med Health Care; 1983 Oct; 11(5):203-9, 213. PubMed ID: 6557312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Whose right is it anyway? Individualism, community, and the right to die: a commentary on the New Jersey experience.
    Weinberg JK
    Hastings Law J; 1988 Nov; 40(1):119-67. PubMed ID: 11659106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Legal aspects of withholding treatment from handicapped newborns: substantive issues.
    Robertson JA
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1986; 11(2):215-30. PubMed ID: 3745837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.