These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2811465)
1. How should we view the incompetent? Rhoden N Law Med Health Care; 1989; 17(3):264-68. PubMed ID: 2811465 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Securing patients' right to refuse medical care: in praise of the Cruzan decision. Emanuel EJ Am J Med; 1992 Mar; 92(3):307-12. PubMed ID: 1546730 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. After Cruzan--the work to be done. Glover JJ; Lynn J J Am Geriatr Soc; 1991 Apr; 39(4):423-4. PubMed ID: 2010595 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Euthanasia: where are we? Where are we going? Fish MS Leg Med; 1987; ():200-12. PubMed ID: 3504981 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Nutritional discontinuation: active or passive euthanasia? Banja JD J Neurosci Nurs; 1990 Apr; 22(2):117-20. PubMed ID: 2139682 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The authority of families to make medical decisions for incompetent patients after the Cruzan decision. King PA Law Med Health Care; 1991; 19(1-2):76-9. PubMed ID: 1895771 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Family decision making on trial. Who decides for incompetent patients? Lo B; Rouse F; Dornbrand L N Engl J Med; 1990 Apr; 322(17):1228-32. PubMed ID: 2109196 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of the Cruzan case on medical practice. Pawlson LG Law Med Health Care; 1991; 19(1-2):69-72. PubMed ID: 1895769 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Confusion in right to die ideology: impact of ethical decision making for treatment of an incompetent client. Harner SR Georget J Leg Ethics; 1991; 4(4):869-98. PubMed ID: 12186076 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Surrogate decisions at risk. The Cruzan case. Thomasma DC J Am Geriatr Soc; 1990 May; 38(5):603-4. PubMed ID: 2110204 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Thunder from California: the Thor decision and the ever-expanding right to die. Brown LC; Paine SJ Healthspan; 1993 Oct; 10(9):13-7. PubMed ID: 10183992 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. What actually happened: an informed review of the Linares incident. Goldman GM; Stratton KM; Brown MD Law Med Health Care; 1989; 17(4):298-307. PubMed ID: 2628644 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Nurses seek a voice in right-to-die cases. Am J Nurs; 1991 Mar; 91(3):26. PubMed ID: 1900146 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Family role in health care decision making. Lynn J Trends Health Care Law Ethics; 1993; 8(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 8453245 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Intimacy and caring: the legacy of Karen Ann Quinlan. Siegler M; Taylor RM Trends Health Care Law Ethics; 1993; 8(1):28-30, 38. PubMed ID: 8453237 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Saying no to life: reflections on death and justice. In re Lawrance. Avila D Issues Law Med; 1993; 9(3):227-54. PubMed ID: 8106235 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Beyond Cruzan: individual rights, family autonomy and the persistent vegetative state. Arras JD J Am Geriatr Soc; 1991 Oct; 39(10):1018-24. PubMed ID: 1918774 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Is "substituted judgment" a valid legal concept? Robertson ED Issues Law Med; 1989; 5(2):197-214. PubMed ID: 2621091 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. In thunder, lightning or in rain: what three doctors can do. Annas GJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1987; 17(5):28-30. PubMed ID: 3692804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is "substituted judgment" a valid legal concept? Liacos PJ Issues Law Med; 1989; 5(2):215-24. PubMed ID: 2621092 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]