These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

815 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28114895)

  • 1. Comparison of methods for estimating the attributable risk in the context of survival analysis.
    Gassama M; Bénichou J; Dartois L; Thiébaut AC
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Jan; 17(1):10. PubMed ID: 28114895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of gastric cancer survival: using an artificial hierarchical neural network.
    Amiri Z; Mohammad K; Mahmoudi M; Zeraati H; Fotouhi A
    Pak J Biol Sci; 2008 Apr; 11(8):1076-84. PubMed ID: 18819544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimating a population cumulative incidence under calendar time trends.
    Hansen SN; Overgaard M; Andersen PK; Parner ET
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Jan; 17(1):7. PubMed ID: 28077076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Survival curve estimation with dependent left truncated data using Cox's model.
    Mackenzie T
    Int J Biostat; 2012 Oct; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 23104845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An empirical comparison of statistical tests for assessing the proportional hazards assumption of Cox's model.
    Ng'andu NH
    Stat Med; 1997 Mar; 16(6):611-26. PubMed ID: 9131751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What price semiparametric Cox regression?
    Jullum M; Hjort NL
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2019 Jul; 25(3):406-438. PubMed ID: 30218417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Application of a hazard-based visual predictive check to evaluate parametric hazard models.
    Huh Y; Hutmacher MM
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2016 Feb; 43(1):57-71. PubMed ID: 26563504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Parametric bootstrap for testing model fitting in the proportional hazards framework: an application to the survival analysis of Bruna dels Pirineus beef calves.
    Casellas J; Tarrés J; Piedrafita J; Varona L
    J Anim Sci; 2006 Oct; 84(10):2609-16. PubMed ID: 16971560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bias and precision of methods for estimating the difference in restricted mean survival time from an individual patient data meta-analysis.
    Lueza B; Rotolo F; Bonastre J; Pignon JP; Michiels S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Mar; 16():37. PubMed ID: 27025706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of different parametric proportional hazards models for interval-censored data: a simulation study.
    Gong Q; Fang L
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2013 Sep; 36(1):276-83. PubMed ID: 23916917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the flexible parametric survival model and Cox model in estimating Markov transition probabilities using real-world data.
    Du X; Li M; Zhu P; Wang J; Hou L; Li J; Meng H; Zhou M; Zhu C
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0200807. PubMed ID: 30133454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimation of the survival function for Gray's piecewise-constant time-varying coefficients model.
    Valenta Z; Weissfeld L
    Stat Med; 2002 Mar; 21(5):717-27. PubMed ID: 11870812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of survival distributions in clinical trials: A practical guidance.
    Chen X; Wang X; Chen K; Zheng Y; Chappell RJ; Dey J
    Clin Trials; 2020 Oct; 17(5):507-521. PubMed ID: 32594788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Confidence intervals for median survival times under a piecewise exponential model with proportional hazards covariate effects.
    Karrison T
    Stat Med; 1996 Jan; 15(2):171-82. PubMed ID: 8614753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A nonparametric mixture model for cure rate estimation.
    Peng Y; Dear KB
    Biometrics; 2000 Mar; 56(1):237-43. PubMed ID: 10783801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficient semiparametric estimation of short-term and long-term hazard ratios with right-censored data.
    Diao G; Zeng D; Yang S
    Biometrics; 2013 Dec; 69(4):840-9. PubMed ID: 24328712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Regression models using parametric pseudo-observations.
    Nygård Johansen M; Lundbye-Christensen S; Thorlund Parner E
    Stat Med; 2020 Sep; 39(22):2949-2961. PubMed ID: 32519771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Aalen's additive and Cox proportional hazards models for breast cancer survival: analysis of population- based data from British Columbia, Canada.
    Abadi A; Saadat S; Yavari P; Bajdik C; Jalili P
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(11):3113-6. PubMed ID: 22393999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Net Chance of a Longer Survival as a Patient-Oriented Measure of Treatment Benefit in Randomized Clinical Trials.
    Péron J; Roy P; Ozenne B; Roche L; Buyse M
    JAMA Oncol; 2016 Jul; 2(7):901-5. PubMed ID: 27124210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Cox's and relative survival models when estimating the effects of prognostic factors on disease-specific mortality: a simulation study under proportional excess hazards.
    Le Teuff G; Abrahamowicz M; Bolard P; Quantin C
    Stat Med; 2005 Dec; 24(24):3887-909. PubMed ID: 16320267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 41.