These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28115199)

  • 21. Backward masking interrupts spatial attention, slows downstream processing, and limits conscious perception.
    Losier T; Lefebvre C; Doro M; Dell'Acqua R; Jolicœur P
    Conscious Cogn; 2017 Sep; 54():101-113. PubMed ID: 28410866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An age-related deficit in preserving the benefits of attention in working memory.
    Loaiza VM; Souza AS
    Psychol Aging; 2019 Mar; 34(2):282-293. PubMed ID: 30640485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The Competitive Influences of Perceptual Load and Working Memory Guidance on Selective Attention.
    Tan J; Zhao Y; Wang L; Tian X; Cui Y; Yang Q; Pan W; Zhao X; Chen A
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0129533. PubMed ID: 26098079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Orienting attention to locations in internal representations.
    Griffin IC; Nobre AC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Nov; 15(8):1176-94. PubMed ID: 14709235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Suppression of no-longer relevant information in Working Memory: An alpha-power related mechanism?
    Poch C; Valdivia M; Capilla A; Hinojosa JA; Campo P
    Biol Psychol; 2018 May; 135():112-116. PubMed ID: 29596957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Opposing effects of memory-driven and stimulus-driven attention on distractor perception.
    Han SW
    Cogn Process; 2018 Feb; 19(1):117-123. PubMed ID: 28871460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The time course of visuo-spatial working memory updating revealed by a retro-cuing paradigm.
    Schneider D; Mertes C; Wascher E
    Sci Rep; 2016 Feb; 6():21442. PubMed ID: 26869057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Probabilistic retro-cues do not determine state in visual working memory.
    Dube B; Lumsden A; Al-Aidroos N
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Apr; 26(2):641-646. PubMed ID: 30276638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Only pre-cueing but no retro-cueing effects emerge with masked arrow cues.
    Janczyk M; Reuss H
    Conscious Cogn; 2016 May; 42():93-100. PubMed ID: 26998561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Social attention directs working memory maintenance.
    Nie QY; Ding X; Chen J; Conci M
    Cognition; 2018 Feb; 171():85-94. PubMed ID: 29121587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Retrospective Selection in Visual and Tactile Working Memory Is Mediated by Shared Control Mechanisms.
    Katus T; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Mar; 32(3):546-557. PubMed ID: 31659924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sustained maintenance of somatotopic information in brain regions recruited by tactile working memory.
    Katus T; Müller MM; Eimer M
    J Neurosci; 2015 Jan; 35(4):1390-5. PubMed ID: 25632117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A dual mechanism underlying retroactive shifts of auditory spatial attention: dissociating target- and distractor-related modulations of alpha lateralization.
    Klatt LI; Getzmann S; Begau A; Schneider D
    Sci Rep; 2020 Aug; 10(1):13860. PubMed ID: 32807850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Electrophysiological evidence for enhanced representation of food stimuli in working memory.
    Rutters F; Kumar S; Higgs S; Humphreys GW
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Feb; 233(2):519-28. PubMed ID: 25354971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Behind the scenes: how visual memory load biases selective attention during processing of visual streams.
    Klaver P; Talsma D
    Psychophysiology; 2013 Nov; 50(11):1133-46. PubMed ID: 24015992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Age-related differences in orienting attention to sound object representations.
    Alain C; Cusimano M; Garami L; Backer KC; Habelt B; Chan V; Hasher L
    Neurobiol Aging; 2018 Jun; 66():1-11. PubMed ID: 29501965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Low cognitive load strengthens distractor interference while high load attenuates when cognitive load and distractor possess similar visual characteristics.
    Minamoto T; Shipstead Z; Osaka N; Engle RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jul; 77(5):1659-73. PubMed ID: 25813738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Remembered but unused: the accessory items in working memory that do not guide attention.
    Peters JC; Goebel R; Roelfsema PR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 21(6):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18702589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Neural activity associated with attention orienting triggered by implied action cues.
    Li K; Liu YJ; Qu F; Fu X
    Brain Res; 2016 Jul; 1642():353-363. PubMed ID: 27067186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Beyond a mask and against the bottleneck: retroactive dual-task interference during working memory consolidation of a masked visual target.
    Nieuwenstein M; Wyble B
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Jun; 143(3):1409-1427. PubMed ID: 24364683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.