These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28115501)

  • 21. Assessment of the Phoenix™ automated system and EUCAST breakpoints for antimicrobial susceptibility testing against isolates expressing clinically relevant resistance mechanisms.
    Giani T; Morosini MI; D'Andrea MM; García-Castillo M; Rossolini GM; Cantón R
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2012 Nov; 18(11):E452-8. PubMed ID: 22909279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Bacterial susceptibility to chemotherapeutic agents (Zurich, 1987)].
    Wüst J; Kayser FH
    Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax; 1989 Jun; 78(26):745-50. PubMed ID: 2756266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Interpretive reading of the antibiogram: Intellectual exercise or clinical need?].
    Cantón Moreno R
    Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 2002 Apr; 20(4):176-85; quiz 186, 190. PubMed ID: 11996706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A rational approach to the selection of an antimicrobial agent.
    Hirsh DC; Ruehl WW
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1984 Nov; 185(10):1058-61. PubMed ID: 6392230
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. EUCAST invite comments on new methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.
    Kahlmeter G; Morris TE
    Anaerobe; 2021 Aug; 70():102417. PubMed ID: 34314866
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Clinical impact of rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing of blood culture isolates.
    Doern GV; Scott DR; Rashad AL
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1982 Jun; 21(6):1023-4. PubMed ID: 7114834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Bacterial sensitivity to chemotherapeutic agents (Zurich, 1990)].
    Wüst J; Kayser FH
    Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax; 1991 Sep; 80(37):946-53. PubMed ID: 1925214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Progress on the development of rapid methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
    Pulido MR; García-Quintanilla M; Martín-Peña R; Cisneros JM; McConnell MJ
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2013 Dec; 68(12):2710-7. PubMed ID: 23818283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Not Available].
    Müller A
    Drug Res (Stuttg); 2018 Nov; 68(S 01):S6-S7. PubMed ID: 30453362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An antibiotic susceptibility testing trial organised as part of the United Kingdom national external microbiological quality assessment scheme.
    Snell JJ; Brown DF; Gardner PS
    J Clin Pathol; 1982 Nov; 35(11):1169-76. PubMed ID: 7142426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Susceptibility testing and reporting of new antibiotics with a focus on tedizolid: an international working group report.
    Wilcox MH; Dmitrieva N; Gales AC; Petukhova I; Al-Obeid S; Rossi F; M Blondeau J
    Future Microbiol; 2017 Dec; 12():1523-1532. PubMed ID: 28812924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Antimicrobials, susceptibility testing, and minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) in veterinary infection treatment.
    Papich MG
    Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract; 2013 Sep; 43(5):1079-89. PubMed ID: 23890240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Widespread implementation of EUCAST breakpoints for antibacterial susceptibility testing in Europe.
    Brown D; Canton R; Dubreuil L; Gatermann S; Giske C; MacGowan A; Martinez-Martinez L; Mouton J; Skov R; Steinbakk M; Walton C; Heuer O; Struelens MJ; Diaz Hogberg L; Kahlmeter G
    Euro Surveill; 2015 Jan; 20(2):. PubMed ID: 25613780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Is there a need for the antibiotic susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria?
    Nagy E; Schuetz A
    Anaerobe; 2015 Feb; 31():2-3. PubMed ID: 25464139
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessment of the usefulness of performing bacterial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing 24 h a day in a clinical microbiology laboratory.
    Eveillard M; Lemarié C; Cottin J; Hitoto H; Mahaza C; Kempf M; Joly-Guillou ML
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2010 Aug; 16(8):1084-9. PubMed ID: 19732085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Bacteria of Veterinary Origin.
    Watts JL; Sweeney MT; Lubbers BV
    Microbiol Spectr; 2018 Mar; 6(2):. PubMed ID: 29600771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Automated direct antimicrobial susceptibility testing of urine specimens].
    Magliani W; Goffi M; Conti S; Toni M
    Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1980 Dec; 16(4):428-36. PubMed ID: 7244113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bacteria isolated from animals: methods for in-vitro susceptibility testing and their suitability with regard to the generation of the most useful data for therapeutic applications].
    Schwarz S; Böttner A; Hafez HM; Kehrenberg C; Kietzmann M; Klarmann D; Klein G; Krabisch P; Kühn T; Luhofer G; Richter A; Traeder W; Waldmann KH; Wallmann J; Werckenthin C
    Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2003; 116(9-10):353-61. PubMed ID: 14526464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing and patterns of resistance at a tertiary care center.
    Akhter J; Qutub MO; Qadri SM
    Saudi Med J; 2001 Jul; 22(7):569-76. PubMed ID: 11479635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Update on Susceptibility Testing: Genotypic and Phenotypic Methods.
    Humphries RM
    Clin Lab Med; 2020 Dec; 40(4):433-446. PubMed ID: 33121613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.